Bone Ring Grafts Versus Non-Resorbable Membrane GBR for Vertical Ridge Augmentation: A Prospective Cohort Study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Ammar Almarghlani, Hanin Alqurashy, Mohanad Alnahdi, Dalia Meisha, Ehab Azab, Hassan Abed, Rayan Sharka, Ali Alghamdi
{"title":"Bone Ring Grafts Versus Non-Resorbable Membrane GBR for Vertical Ridge Augmentation: A Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Ammar Almarghlani, Hanin Alqurashy, Mohanad Alnahdi, Dalia Meisha, Ehab Azab, Hassan Abed, Rayan Sharka, Ali Alghamdi","doi":"10.3290/j.ohpd.c_2748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Vertical alveolar bone defects often require advanced augmentation techniques to enable successful implant placement. The aim of this study was to compare short-term vertical bone gain following two approaches: the bone-ring graft technique and guided bone regeneration (GBR) using a non-resorbable membrane in patients with vertical alveolar deficiencies.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study was conducted involving 30 systemically healthy adult patients with posterior mandibular vertical bone defects measuring ≥4 mm. Participants were assigned to one of two treatment groups: Group A received the bone ring in conjunction with titanium implants and a resorbable collagen membrane; Group B was treated with allogeneic bone grafts and titanium-reinforced dense polytetrafluoroethylene (d-PTFE) membranes. Radiographic evaluations were performed at baseline, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and periapical radiographs. The primary outcome was vertical bone height gain. The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics Version 28.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group A demonstrated statistically significantly greater vertical bone gain at all postoperative intervals: 9.1 mm at 1 week, 10.6 mm at 1 month, and 9.7 mm at 3 months, compared to 7.8 mm, 7.0 mm, and 6.9 mm, respectively, in Group B (p 0.0001). Plaque index scores were comparable between groups, with no statistically significant differences observed in postoperative swelling or infection rates. However, membrane exposure was statistically significantly more frequent in Group B at all follow-up visits (p ≤ 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The bone-ring graft technique was associated with greater vertical bone gain and a lower incidence of membrane exposure compared to GBR using a non-resorbable membrane. Further studies with longer follow-up are required to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19696,"journal":{"name":"Oral health & preventive dentistry","volume":"24 ","pages":"481-488"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13316739/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral health & preventive dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ohpd.c_2748","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Vertical alveolar bone defects often require advanced augmentation techniques to enable successful implant placement. The aim of this study was to compare short-term vertical bone gain following two approaches: the bone-ring graft technique and guided bone regeneration (GBR) using a non-resorbable membrane in patients with vertical alveolar deficiencies.

Materials and methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted involving 30 systemically healthy adult patients with posterior mandibular vertical bone defects measuring ≥4 mm. Participants were assigned to one of two treatment groups: Group A received the bone ring in conjunction with titanium implants and a resorbable collagen membrane; Group B was treated with allogeneic bone grafts and titanium-reinforced dense polytetrafluoroethylene (d-PTFE) membranes. Radiographic evaluations were performed at baseline, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and periapical radiographs. The primary outcome was vertical bone height gain. The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics Version 28.0.

Results: Group A demonstrated statistically significantly greater vertical bone gain at all postoperative intervals: 9.1 mm at 1 week, 10.6 mm at 1 month, and 9.7 mm at 3 months, compared to 7.8 mm, 7.0 mm, and 6.9 mm, respectively, in Group B (p 0.0001). Plaque index scores were comparable between groups, with no statistically significant differences observed in postoperative swelling or infection rates. However, membrane exposure was statistically significantly more frequent in Group B at all follow-up visits (p ≤ 0.02).

Conclusion: The bone-ring graft technique was associated with greater vertical bone gain and a lower incidence of membrane exposure compared to GBR using a non-resorbable membrane. Further studies with longer follow-up are required to confirm these findings.

骨环移植与不可吸收膜GBR垂直嵴增强:一项前瞻性队列研究。
目的:垂直牙槽骨缺损通常需要先进的增强技术才能成功植入种植体。本研究的目的是比较两种方法:骨环移植技术和使用不可吸收膜的引导骨再生(GBR)对垂直牙槽缺损患者的短期垂直骨增加。材料和方法:一项前瞻性队列研究纳入了30例全身健康的成人下颌后垂直骨缺损≥4 mm的患者。参与者被分配到两个治疗组中的一个:A组接受骨环与钛植入物和可吸收胶原膜的结合;B组采用同种异体骨移植和钛增强致密聚四氟乙烯(d-PTFE)膜处理。在基线、术后1周、1个月和3个月通过锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)和根尖周x线片进行放射学评估。主要结果是垂直骨高度增加。采用IBM SPSS Statistics Version 28.0对数据进行分析。结果:A组在所有术后时间间隔的垂直骨增重均有统计学意义上的显著增加:1周时为9.1 mm, 1个月时为10.6 mm, 3个月时为9.7 mm,而B组分别为7.8 mm, 7.0 mm和6.9 mm (p 0.0001)。各组间斑块指数评分具有可比性,术后肿胀或感染率无统计学差异。然而,B组在所有随访中膜暴露的频率有统计学意义(p≤0.02)。结论:与使用不可吸收膜的GBR相比,骨环移植技术具有更大的垂直骨增重和更低的膜暴露发生率。需要进一步的研究和更长时间的随访来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oral health & preventive dentistry
Oral health & preventive dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinicians, general practitioners, teachers, researchers, and public health administrators will find this journal an indispensable source of essential, timely information about scientific progress in the fields of oral health and the prevention of caries, periodontal diseases, oral mucosal diseases, and dental trauma. Central topics, including oral hygiene, oral epidemiology, oral health promotion, and public health issues, are covered in peer-reviewed articles such as clinical and basic science research reports; reviews; invited focus articles, commentaries, and guest editorials; and symposium, workshop, and conference proceedings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书