Development of a multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay for the detection of Piroplasma (Babesia spp. and Theileria spp.), Anaplasma spp., and Trypanosoma evansi in cattle.

IF 1.6 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Open Veterinary Journal Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-31 DOI:10.5455/OVJ.2026.v16.i5.61
Jiravich Methawiroon, Piangjai Chalermwong, Ornarin Boonjint, Piangdow Chiawvitkan, Sakulchit Wichianchot, Chanapath Thabthimsri, Preeyanuch Thongpoo, Ketsarin Kamyingkird, Sathaporn Jittapalapong, Eukote Suwan
{"title":"Development of a multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay for the detection of Piroplasma (<i>Babesia</i> spp. and <i>Theileria</i> spp.), <i>Anaplasma</i> spp., and <i>Trypanosoma evansi</i> in cattle.","authors":"Jiravich Methawiroon, Piangjai Chalermwong, Ornarin Boonjint, Piangdow Chiawvitkan, Sakulchit Wichianchot, Chanapath Thabthimsri, Preeyanuch Thongpoo, Ketsarin Kamyingkird, Sathaporn Jittapalapong, Eukote Suwan","doi":"10.5455/OVJ.2026.v16.i5.61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Blood parasites cause serious drawbacks in the livestock industry. The detection methods rely on microscopic examination and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which requires an expert person, labor, time, and cost.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>In this study, a multiplex PCR has been developed for hemoparasites consisting of Piroplasma (<i>Babesia</i> spp. and <i>Theileria</i> spp.), <i>Anaplasma</i> spp., and <i>Trypanosoma evansi</i> detections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Blood parasite infections in cattle were investigated using three different methods: microscopic examination, single PCR, and multiplex PCR. The <i>Anaplasma</i> 16s rRNA gene, <i>Babesia</i> 18s rRNA gene, <i>Theileria</i> <i>major piroplasm surface protein</i> gene, and <i>Trypanosome</i> <i>ITS1</i> gene have been used to detect <i>Anaplasma</i> spp., <i>Babesia</i> spp., <i>Theileria</i> spp., and <i>T. evansi</i>, respectively, using molecular methods. The sensitivity and specificity of multiplex PCR were evaluated. Multiplex PCR results were compared with microscopic examination and single PCR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multiplex PCR assay revealed a limit of detection of 0.01-10 pg of parasite DNA. According to the evaluation of 60 bovine blood samples, blood smear, single PCR, and multiplex PCR revealed 50.0%, 18.3%, and 26.7% of single infections, and 40.0%, 81.7%, and 50.0% of co-infections, respectively. The comparative analysis between multiplex PCR with microscopic examination and single PCR revealed that triple infection, <i>Babesia</i> spp., <i>Theileria</i> spp., and <i>T. evansi</i>, showed 50.0% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and positive predictive value, 98% negative predictive value, and substantial agreement indicated by a Cohen's Kappa value of 0.659.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The multiplex PCR assay developed in this study may be helpful for improved hemoparasite prevention and control when combined with farmer education, proper hygiene practices, and effective environmental management.</p>","PeriodicalId":19531,"journal":{"name":"Open Veterinary Journal","volume":"16 5","pages":"3218-3228"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13314195/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Veterinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/OVJ.2026.v16.i5.61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Blood parasites cause serious drawbacks in the livestock industry. The detection methods rely on microscopic examination and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which requires an expert person, labor, time, and cost.

Aim: In this study, a multiplex PCR has been developed for hemoparasites consisting of Piroplasma (Babesia spp. and Theileria spp.), Anaplasma spp., and Trypanosoma evansi detections.

Methods: Blood parasite infections in cattle were investigated using three different methods: microscopic examination, single PCR, and multiplex PCR. The Anaplasma 16s rRNA gene, Babesia 18s rRNA gene, Theileria major piroplasm surface protein gene, and Trypanosome ITS1 gene have been used to detect Anaplasma spp., Babesia spp., Theileria spp., and T. evansi, respectively, using molecular methods. The sensitivity and specificity of multiplex PCR were evaluated. Multiplex PCR results were compared with microscopic examination and single PCR.

Results: Multiplex PCR assay revealed a limit of detection of 0.01-10 pg of parasite DNA. According to the evaluation of 60 bovine blood samples, blood smear, single PCR, and multiplex PCR revealed 50.0%, 18.3%, and 26.7% of single infections, and 40.0%, 81.7%, and 50.0% of co-infections, respectively. The comparative analysis between multiplex PCR with microscopic examination and single PCR revealed that triple infection, Babesia spp., Theileria spp., and T. evansi, showed 50.0% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and positive predictive value, 98% negative predictive value, and substantial agreement indicated by a Cohen's Kappa value of 0.659.

Conclusion: The multiplex PCR assay developed in this study may be helpful for improved hemoparasite prevention and control when combined with farmer education, proper hygiene practices, and effective environmental management.

建立了一种多重聚合酶链反应法检测牛体内螺原体(巴贝斯虫和伊氏杆菌)、无形体和伊氏锥虫。
背景:血寄生虫对畜牧业造成严重危害。检测方法依赖于显微镜检查和聚合酶链反应(PCR),这需要专家、人力、时间和成本。目的:本研究建立了由螺旋体(巴贝斯虫和伊氏杆菌)、无形体和伊氏锥虫组成的血液寄生虫多重PCR检测方法。方法:采用显微镜检查、单次PCR和多重PCR三种方法对牛血液寄生虫感染情况进行调查。利用无形体16s rRNA基因、巴贝斯虫18s rRNA基因、希勒氏菌主要梨质表面蛋白基因和锥虫ITS1基因分别对无形体、巴贝斯虫、希勒氏菌和伊文氏t虫进行了分子检测。评价多重PCR的敏感性和特异性。将多重PCR结果与单次PCR结果进行比较。结果:多重PCR检测限为0.01 ~ 10 pg。对60份牛血液样本进行评价,血液涂片、单次PCR和多重PCR分别显示50.0%、18.3%和26.7%的单次感染和40.0%、81.7%和50.0%的合并感染。显微镜检查多重PCR与单次PCR的比较分析显示,巴贝斯虫、伊氏泰氏菌和伊氏T. evansi三种感染的敏感性为50.0%,特异性为100%,阳性预测值为98%,阴性预测值为0.659,两者基本一致。结论:本研究建立的多重PCR检测方法与农民教育、良好的卫生习惯和有效的环境管理相结合,有助于改善血虫的预防和控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Veterinary Journal
Open Veterinary Journal VETERINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Veterinary Journal is a peer-reviewed international open access online and printed journal that publishes high-quality original research articles. reviews, short communications and case reports dedicated to all aspects of veterinary sciences and its related subjects. Research areas include the following: Infectious diseases of zoonotic/food-borne importance, applied biochemistry, parasitology, endocrinology, microbiology, immunology, pathology, pharmacology, physiology, epidemiology, molecular biology, immunogenetics, surgery, ophthalmology, dermatology, oncology and animal reproduction. All papers are peer-reviewed. Moreover, with the presence of well-qualified group of international referees, the process of publication will be done meticulously and to the highest standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书