Development and Evaluation of the Adenoid/Nasopharynx Area Ratio on Lateral Cephalograms: Correlation With Nasal Endoscopy.

IF 1.6 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
OTO Open Pub Date : 2026-06-29 eCollection Date: 2026-07-01 DOI:10.1002/oto2.70273
Jiaming Zhu, Le Chen, Xiaoli Zhou, Wenyan Li
{"title":"Development and Evaluation of the Adenoid/Nasopharynx Area Ratio on Lateral Cephalograms: Correlation With Nasal Endoscopy.","authors":"Jiaming Zhu, Le Chen, Xiaoli Zhou, Wenyan Li","doi":"10.1002/oto2.70273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The clinical assessment of adenoid hypertrophy presents 2 practical challenges: (1) the need for an objective, reproducible estimate of nasopharyngeal obstruction in children when cooperation is limited and (2) the need for a reliable radiographic metric to support interdisciplinary assessment and communication between dental/orthodontic providers and otolaryngologists. To address these challenges, this study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a novel radiographic index-Adenoid/Nasopharynx Area Ratio-derived from lateral cephalometric radiographs.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University and affiliated orthodontic clinics, Shanghai, China (June 2023-August 2024).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive children aged 2 to 14 years flagged for suspected adenoid hypertrophy during routine dental examinations were screened; eligible participants were enrolled after prespecified exclusions. De-identified data were analyzed between August and October 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ANAR showed a numerically higher correlation with endoscopic grades than the A/N ratio (<i>r</i> = 0.649 vs 0.603). For severe obstruction, ANAR cutoff 0.64 yielded sensitivity 70.9% and specificity 82.3% (AUC 0.834; 95% CI, 0.76-0.90); the A/N ratio AUC was 0.793. Inter-rater reliability for ANAR measurement was good (intraclass correlation coefficient [A,1] = 0.924; 95% confidence interval, 0.848-0.963; n = 30).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adenoid/Nasopharynx Area Ratio is a practical, reproducible planimetric index derived from lateral cephalograms that may support opportunistic upper airway assessment when imaging is already obtained for dental/orthodontic care. Nasal endoscopy remains the reference standard; ANAR is complementary, and additional radiographs solely for adenoid evaluation are not recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":19697,"journal":{"name":"OTO Open","volume":"10 3","pages":"e70273"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13312990/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OTO Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/oto2.70273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The clinical assessment of adenoid hypertrophy presents 2 practical challenges: (1) the need for an objective, reproducible estimate of nasopharyngeal obstruction in children when cooperation is limited and (2) the need for a reliable radiographic metric to support interdisciplinary assessment and communication between dental/orthodontic providers and otolaryngologists. To address these challenges, this study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a novel radiographic index-Adenoid/Nasopharynx Area Ratio-derived from lateral cephalometric radiographs.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University and affiliated orthodontic clinics, Shanghai, China (June 2023-August 2024).

Methods: Consecutive children aged 2 to 14 years flagged for suspected adenoid hypertrophy during routine dental examinations were screened; eligible participants were enrolled after prespecified exclusions. De-identified data were analyzed between August and October 2024.

Results: ANAR showed a numerically higher correlation with endoscopic grades than the A/N ratio (r = 0.649 vs 0.603). For severe obstruction, ANAR cutoff 0.64 yielded sensitivity 70.9% and specificity 82.3% (AUC 0.834; 95% CI, 0.76-0.90); the A/N ratio AUC was 0.793. Inter-rater reliability for ANAR measurement was good (intraclass correlation coefficient [A,1] = 0.924; 95% confidence interval, 0.848-0.963; n = 30).

Conclusion: Adenoid/Nasopharynx Area Ratio is a practical, reproducible planimetric index derived from lateral cephalograms that may support opportunistic upper airway assessment when imaging is already obtained for dental/orthodontic care. Nasal endoscopy remains the reference standard; ANAR is complementary, and additional radiographs solely for adenoid evaluation are not recommended.

侧位头片上腺样体/鼻咽面积比值的发展和评价:与鼻内镜的相关性。
目的:腺样体肥大的临床评估提出了两个实际挑战:(1)在合作有限的情况下,需要一个客观的、可重复的儿童鼻咽阻塞评估;(2)需要一个可靠的放射学指标来支持牙科/正畸提供者和耳鼻喉科医生之间的跨学科评估和沟通。为了解决这些挑战,本研究旨在评估一种新的放射学指标-来自侧位头侧x线片的腺样体/鼻咽面积比的诊断性能。研究设计:回顾性队列研究。工作地点:中国上海复旦大学附属眼耳鼻喉科医院及正畸诊所(206.06 - 2024 / 08)。方法:在常规牙科检查中连续筛查疑似腺样体肥大的2至14岁儿童;符合条件的参与者在预先规定的排除后被纳入。分析了2024年8月至10月期间的去识别数据。结果:ANAR与内镜分级的数值相关性高于a /N比(r = 0.649 vs 0.603)。对于严重梗阻,ANAR截止值0.64的敏感性为70.9%,特异性为82.3% (AUC 0.834; 95% CI, 0.76-0.90);A/N比AUC为0.793。ANAR测量的组间信度较好(组内相关系数[A,1] = 0.924; 95%可信区间为0.848 ~ 0.963;n = 30)。结论:腺样体/鼻咽部面积比是一种实用的、可重复的平面测量指标,来自侧位头颅造影,当已经获得牙科/正畸护理成像时,可以支持机会性的上呼吸道评估。鼻内窥镜检查仍然是参考标准;ANAR是补充性的,不推荐仅用于腺样体评估的额外x线片。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
OTO Open
OTO Open Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书