Effects of exercise interventions on core health outcomes in patients with SLE: systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Zehui He, Shuqi Jia, Mengsi Chen, Xinxin Shi, Lunuo Hu, Fei Li, Hui Shi, David C Nieman, Yue Shi
{"title":"Effects of exercise interventions on core health outcomes in patients with SLE: systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Zehui He, Shuqi Jia, Mengsi Chen, Xinxin Shi, Lunuo Hu, Fei Li, Hui Shi, David C Nieman, Yue Shi","doi":"10.1136/lupus-2026-002027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This meta-analysis evaluated the effects of exercise interventions on key health outcomes in adults with SLE, including fatigue, physical function, aerobic capacity, disease activity, depression and pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, we systematically searched four databases up to February 2025 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in adults diagnosed with SLE according to the American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (ACR/EULAR) criteria. Eligible studies examined aerobic, resistance or combined exercise as the sole intervention. Meta-analyses were conducted using Hedges' g, the Risk of Bias 2 (ROB-2) tool and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system used to assess bias and evidence quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve RCTs involving 470 participants were included. Exercise showed small-to-moderate improvements in fatigue (g=-0.53, 95% CI -0.81 to -0.25, p<0.001), physical function (g=0.46, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.68, p<0.001), aerobic capacity (g=0.47, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.71, p<0.001), depression (g=-0.36, 95% CI -0.64 to -0.09, p=0.01) and pain (g=-0.53, 95% CI -0.86 to -0.20, p<0.001), with no significant change in disease activity (g=0.18, 95% CI -0.16 to 0.51, p=0.30). Subgroup analyses suggested greater benefits with moderate-intensity programmes lasting 8-12 weeks. GRADE rated the evidence as moderate for fatigue, physical function, depression and pain, and low for other outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Exercise is an effective non-pharmacological therapy in SLE management, improving several physical and psychological outcomes. Individualised, moderate-intensity and supervised programmes are recommended. Further research should optimise intervention protocols and evaluate long-term safety.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD420251115953.</p>","PeriodicalId":18126,"journal":{"name":"Lupus Science & Medicine","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13331240/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lupus Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2026-002027","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This meta-analysis evaluated the effects of exercise interventions on key health outcomes in adults with SLE, including fatigue, physical function, aerobic capacity, disease activity, depression and pain.

Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, we systematically searched four databases up to February 2025 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in adults diagnosed with SLE according to the American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (ACR/EULAR) criteria. Eligible studies examined aerobic, resistance or combined exercise as the sole intervention. Meta-analyses were conducted using Hedges' g, the Risk of Bias 2 (ROB-2) tool and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system used to assess bias and evidence quality.

Results: Twelve RCTs involving 470 participants were included. Exercise showed small-to-moderate improvements in fatigue (g=-0.53, 95% CI -0.81 to -0.25, p<0.001), physical function (g=0.46, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.68, p<0.001), aerobic capacity (g=0.47, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.71, p<0.001), depression (g=-0.36, 95% CI -0.64 to -0.09, p=0.01) and pain (g=-0.53, 95% CI -0.86 to -0.20, p<0.001), with no significant change in disease activity (g=0.18, 95% CI -0.16 to 0.51, p=0.30). Subgroup analyses suggested greater benefits with moderate-intensity programmes lasting 8-12 weeks. GRADE rated the evidence as moderate for fatigue, physical function, depression and pain, and low for other outcomes.

Conclusion: Exercise is an effective non-pharmacological therapy in SLE management, improving several physical and psychological outcomes. Individualised, moderate-intensity and supervised programmes are recommended. Further research should optimise intervention protocols and evaluate long-term safety.

Prospero registration number: CRD420251115953.

运动干预对SLE患者核心健康结局的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的:本荟萃分析评估了运动干预对SLE成人主要健康结局的影响,包括疲劳、身体功能、有氧能力、疾病活动性、抑郁和疼痛。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA) 2020指南的首选报告项目,我们系统地检索了四个数据库,截至2025年2月,根据美国风湿病学会/欧洲风湿病协会联盟(ACR/EULAR)标准诊断为SLE的成人随机对照试验(rct)。有资格的研究将有氧运动、阻力运动或联合运动作为唯一的干预措施。meta分析采用Hedges' g、偏倚风险2 (rob2)工具和用于评估偏倚和证据质量的建议分级评估、发展和评价(GRADE)系统进行。结果:纳入12项随机对照试验,涉及470名受试者。运动对疲劳有小到中度的改善(g=-0.53, 95% CI -0.81至-0.25)。结论:运动是SLE管理中一种有效的非药物治疗方法,可改善多项生理和心理结果。建议进行个体化、中等强度和有监督的培训。进一步的研究应该优化干预方案并评估长期安全性。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD420251115953。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lupus Science & Medicine
Lupus Science & Medicine RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
88
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Lupus Science & Medicine is a global, peer reviewed, open access online journal that provides a central point for publication of basic, clinical, translational, and epidemiological studies of all aspects of lupus and related diseases. It is the first lupus-specific open access journal in the world and was developed in response to the need for a barrier-free forum for publication of groundbreaking studies in lupus. The journal publishes research on lupus from fields including, but not limited to: rheumatology, dermatology, nephrology, immunology, pediatrics, cardiology, hepatology, pulmonology, obstetrics and gynecology, and psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书