Extrapedicular approach for basivertebral nerve radiofrequency ablation: a conceptual review.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Jimmy Wen, Megan Kou, Nathaniel Duong, Adam Razick, Arsh Alam, Sugamjot Badhan, Jose Silva, Megan Hsu, Sam Warner, Rohin Thomas, Foad Elahi
{"title":"Extrapedicular approach for basivertebral nerve radiofrequency ablation: a conceptual review.","authors":"Jimmy Wen, Megan Kou, Nathaniel Duong, Adam Razick, Arsh Alam, Sugamjot Badhan, Jose Silva, Megan Hsu, Sam Warner, Rohin Thomas, Foad Elahi","doi":"10.1186/s13018-026-07074-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic axial low back pain (LBP) of vertebrogenic origin is increasingly recognized as a distinct clinical entity responsive to basivertebral nerve (BVN) radiofrequency ablation (RFA). This analysis synthesizes the anatomical, biomechanical, and safety considerations of both access routes and evaluates their clinical implications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature review was conducted in PubMed for articles on BVNRFA anatomy, techniques, and access routes published through December 1, 2025. Given the limited literature on extrapedicular BVNRFA, studies from the vertebral augmentation literature were included if appropriate for access route considerations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The standard technique for BVNRFA utilizes a transpedicular trajectory to access the vertebral body, which provides a consistent trajectory using the pedicle but places the introducer in proximity to the facet joints, dorsal root ganglion, exiting spinal nerve, and paraspinal muscles. Emerging evidence has described the extrapedicular approach, which follows a lateral pathway, may be considered for select patients with anatomical challenges, such as narrow pedicles or preexisting pedicle instrumentation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Currently, there is no clinical evidence to suggest the superiority of the extrapedicular approach over the traditional transpedicular approach. Each has its own anatomical considerations, technical challenges, and risks to consider, which require imaging guidance and careful adherence to anatomical landmarks. Further biomechanical, cadaveric, animal model, and clinical studies are warranted to assess the relative efficacy, safety, and long-term implications of each approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13579743/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-026-07074-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic axial low back pain (LBP) of vertebrogenic origin is increasingly recognized as a distinct clinical entity responsive to basivertebral nerve (BVN) radiofrequency ablation (RFA). This analysis synthesizes the anatomical, biomechanical, and safety considerations of both access routes and evaluates their clinical implications.

Methods: A literature review was conducted in PubMed for articles on BVNRFA anatomy, techniques, and access routes published through December 1, 2025. Given the limited literature on extrapedicular BVNRFA, studies from the vertebral augmentation literature were included if appropriate for access route considerations.

Results: The standard technique for BVNRFA utilizes a transpedicular trajectory to access the vertebral body, which provides a consistent trajectory using the pedicle but places the introducer in proximity to the facet joints, dorsal root ganglion, exiting spinal nerve, and paraspinal muscles. Emerging evidence has described the extrapedicular approach, which follows a lateral pathway, may be considered for select patients with anatomical challenges, such as narrow pedicles or preexisting pedicle instrumentation.

Conclusion: Currently, there is no clinical evidence to suggest the superiority of the extrapedicular approach over the traditional transpedicular approach. Each has its own anatomical considerations, technical challenges, and risks to consider, which require imaging guidance and careful adherence to anatomical landmarks. Further biomechanical, cadaveric, animal model, and clinical studies are warranted to assess the relative efficacy, safety, and long-term implications of each approach.

椎体神经椎弓根外入路射频消融:概念回顾。
背景:椎体源性慢性轴性腰痛(LBP)越来越被认为是一种对椎基神经(BVN)射频消融(RFA)有反应的独特临床症状。本分析综合了解剖、生物力学和安全方面的考虑,并评估了它们的临床意义。方法:检索PubMed截至2025年12月1日发表的关于BVNRFA解剖、技术和获取途径的文章。考虑到椎弓根外BVNRFA的文献有限,如果出于通道考虑,我们纳入了椎体增强术文献中的研究。结果:BVNRFA的标准技术采用经椎弓根轨迹进入椎体,使用椎弓根提供一致的轨迹,但将引入器放置在小关节、背根神经节、出脊神经和棘旁肌肉附近。新出现的证据描述了椎弓根外入路,该入路遵循外侧路径,可以考虑用于有解剖困难的患者,如狭窄的椎弓根或先前存在的椎弓根内固定。结论:目前尚无临床证据表明椎弓根外入路优于传统的经椎弓根入路。每一种都有自己的解剖学考虑、技术挑战和风险需要考虑,这需要成像指导和仔细遵守解剖学标志。进一步的生物力学、尸体、动物模型和临床研究是必要的,以评估每种方法的相对有效性、安全性和长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书