Jimmy Wen, Megan Kou, Nathaniel Duong, Adam Razick, Arsh Alam, Sugamjot Badhan, Jose Silva, Megan Hsu, Sam Warner, Rohin Thomas, Foad Elahi
{"title":"Extrapedicular approach for basivertebral nerve radiofrequency ablation: a conceptual review.","authors":"Jimmy Wen, Megan Kou, Nathaniel Duong, Adam Razick, Arsh Alam, Sugamjot Badhan, Jose Silva, Megan Hsu, Sam Warner, Rohin Thomas, Foad Elahi","doi":"10.1186/s13018-026-07074-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic axial low back pain (LBP) of vertebrogenic origin is increasingly recognized as a distinct clinical entity responsive to basivertebral nerve (BVN) radiofrequency ablation (RFA). This analysis synthesizes the anatomical, biomechanical, and safety considerations of both access routes and evaluates their clinical implications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature review was conducted in PubMed for articles on BVNRFA anatomy, techniques, and access routes published through December 1, 2025. Given the limited literature on extrapedicular BVNRFA, studies from the vertebral augmentation literature were included if appropriate for access route considerations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The standard technique for BVNRFA utilizes a transpedicular trajectory to access the vertebral body, which provides a consistent trajectory using the pedicle but places the introducer in proximity to the facet joints, dorsal root ganglion, exiting spinal nerve, and paraspinal muscles. Emerging evidence has described the extrapedicular approach, which follows a lateral pathway, may be considered for select patients with anatomical challenges, such as narrow pedicles or preexisting pedicle instrumentation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Currently, there is no clinical evidence to suggest the superiority of the extrapedicular approach over the traditional transpedicular approach. Each has its own anatomical considerations, technical challenges, and risks to consider, which require imaging guidance and careful adherence to anatomical landmarks. Further biomechanical, cadaveric, animal model, and clinical studies are warranted to assess the relative efficacy, safety, and long-term implications of each approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13579743/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-026-07074-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Chronic axial low back pain (LBP) of vertebrogenic origin is increasingly recognized as a distinct clinical entity responsive to basivertebral nerve (BVN) radiofrequency ablation (RFA). This analysis synthesizes the anatomical, biomechanical, and safety considerations of both access routes and evaluates their clinical implications.
Methods: A literature review was conducted in PubMed for articles on BVNRFA anatomy, techniques, and access routes published through December 1, 2025. Given the limited literature on extrapedicular BVNRFA, studies from the vertebral augmentation literature were included if appropriate for access route considerations.
Results: The standard technique for BVNRFA utilizes a transpedicular trajectory to access the vertebral body, which provides a consistent trajectory using the pedicle but places the introducer in proximity to the facet joints, dorsal root ganglion, exiting spinal nerve, and paraspinal muscles. Emerging evidence has described the extrapedicular approach, which follows a lateral pathway, may be considered for select patients with anatomical challenges, such as narrow pedicles or preexisting pedicle instrumentation.
Conclusion: Currently, there is no clinical evidence to suggest the superiority of the extrapedicular approach over the traditional transpedicular approach. Each has its own anatomical considerations, technical challenges, and risks to consider, which require imaging guidance and careful adherence to anatomical landmarks. Further biomechanical, cadaveric, animal model, and clinical studies are warranted to assess the relative efficacy, safety, and long-term implications of each approach.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues.
Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications.
JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.