Distinct Longitudinal Trajectories of SLEDAI-2K Scores Predict Prognosis in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Based on Group-Based Trajectory Modeling.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Renren Ouyang, Ali Xiong, Xiaochun Shu, Ting Wang, Wei Wei, Rujia Chen, Feng Wang, Hongyan Hou, Shiji Wu
{"title":"Distinct Longitudinal Trajectories of SLEDAI-2K Scores Predict Prognosis in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Based on Group-Based Trajectory Modeling.","authors":"Renren Ouyang, Ali Xiong, Xiaochun Shu, Ting Wang, Wei Wei, Rujia Chen, Feng Wang, Hongyan Hou, Shiji Wu","doi":"10.1155/jimr/5322286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To apply group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) to longitudinal real world data from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) to identify distinct disease activity trajectories and factors associated with 6 month clinical status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 91 patients with SLE treated between 2017 and 2024 were included. SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) scores were assessed at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. GBTM was used to characterize longitudinal disease activity patterns. Heatmap clustering analysis was performed to compare clinical laboratory variables and SLEDAI-2K scores across trajectory groups and to further explore their association with 6 month clinical status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two distinct disease activity trajectories were identified. Class 1, comprising patients with higher initial SLEDAI-2K scores, was predominantly composed of nonremission cases (90.91%). Class 2, characterized by lower initial SLEDAI-2K scores, showed a more balanced distribution of nonremission (46.81%) and remission (53.19%) patients. At 6 months, the remission subgroup had significantly lower SLEDAI-2K scores and lower urinary biomarker levels, including 24 h urinary microalbumin (24 h-UMA), 24 h urinary micrototal protein (24 h-UMTP), UMA, and UMTP, than the nonremission subgroup.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Longitudinal monitoring of SLEDAI-2K trajectories may help identify patients at risk for persistent high disease activity or nonremission at 6 months and those who may benefit from closer monitoring and treatment adjustment. These findings support a stratified management approach in SLE based on trajectory profiles.</p>","PeriodicalId":15952,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Immunology Research","volume":"2026 1","pages":"e5322286"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13317468/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Immunology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/jimr/5322286","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To apply group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) to longitudinal real world data from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) to identify distinct disease activity trajectories and factors associated with 6 month clinical status.

Methods: A total of 91 patients with SLE treated between 2017 and 2024 were included. SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) scores were assessed at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. GBTM was used to characterize longitudinal disease activity patterns. Heatmap clustering analysis was performed to compare clinical laboratory variables and SLEDAI-2K scores across trajectory groups and to further explore their association with 6 month clinical status.

Results: Two distinct disease activity trajectories were identified. Class 1, comprising patients with higher initial SLEDAI-2K scores, was predominantly composed of nonremission cases (90.91%). Class 2, characterized by lower initial SLEDAI-2K scores, showed a more balanced distribution of nonremission (46.81%) and remission (53.19%) patients. At 6 months, the remission subgroup had significantly lower SLEDAI-2K scores and lower urinary biomarker levels, including 24 h urinary microalbumin (24 h-UMA), 24 h urinary micrototal protein (24 h-UMTP), UMA, and UMTP, than the nonremission subgroup.

Conclusions: Longitudinal monitoring of SLEDAI-2K trajectories may help identify patients at risk for persistent high disease activity or nonremission at 6 months and those who may benefit from closer monitoring and treatment adjustment. These findings support a stratified management approach in SLE based on trajectory profiles.

基于分组轨迹模型的SLEDAI-2K评分不同的纵向轨迹预测系统性红斑狼疮的预后
目的:将基于组的轨迹模型(GBTM)应用于系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者的纵向真实世界数据,以识别与6个月临床状态相关的不同疾病活动轨迹和因素。方法:共纳入2017 - 2024年间治疗的91例SLE患者。SLE疾病活动指数2000 (SLEDAI-2K)评分分别在基线、3个月和6个月进行评估。GBTM用于描述纵向疾病活动模式。采用热图聚类分析比较临床实验室变量和SLEDAI-2K评分,并进一步探讨其与6个月临床状态的关系。结果:确定了两种不同的疾病活动轨迹。第1类,包括初始SLEDAI-2K评分较高的患者,主要由非缓解病例组成(90.91%)。第2类患者的特点是初始SLEDAI-2K评分较低,非缓解(46.81%)和缓解(53.19%)患者的分布更为平衡。6个月时,与非缓解亚组相比,缓解亚组的SLEDAI-2K评分和尿液生物标志物水平(包括24 h尿微量白蛋白(24 h-UMA)、24 h尿微量总蛋白(24 h-UMTP)、UMA和UMTP)显著降低。结论:SLEDAI-2K轨迹的纵向监测可能有助于识别6个月时持续高疾病活动性或不缓解风险的患者,以及可能从更密切的监测和治疗调整中受益的患者。这些发现支持基于病程轨迹的SLE分层管理方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
423
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Immunology Research is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a platform for scientists and clinicians working in different areas of immunology and therapy. The journal publishes research articles, review articles, as well as clinical studies related to classical immunology, molecular immunology, clinical immunology, cancer immunology, transplantation immunology, immune pathology, immunodeficiency, autoimmune diseases, immune disorders, and immunotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书