Artificial intelligence in clinical trial participant recruitment and retention: A scoping review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.7 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2026-04-23 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1017/cts.2026.10743
Ziran Yin, Yun-Chung Liu, Jonathan Chong Kai Liew, Rui Yang, Stephanie Hendren, Elisa Ma, Zhaomei Geng, Jiahan Wang, Henry Foote, Christopher Lindsell, Chuan Hong
{"title":"Artificial intelligence in clinical trial participant recruitment and retention: A scoping review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Ziran Yin, Yun-Chung Liu, Jonathan Chong Kai Liew, Rui Yang, Stephanie Hendren, Elisa Ma, Zhaomei Geng, Jiahan Wang, Henry Foote, Christopher Lindsell, Chuan Hong","doi":"10.1017/cts.2026.10743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recruitment and retention challenges continue to hinder the success of clinical trials. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising means to optimize various clinical trial processes; however, its impact specifically on recruitment and retention has not been comprehensively evaluated. This scoping review utilized the Joanna Briggs Institute framework and adhered to PRISMA-ScR guidelines, systematically searching literature published between January 2018 and June 2024 across multiple databases. Of the 21,573 records screened, 121 studies were included. A meta-analysis was conducted to quantitatively assess the performance of AI-driven tools. AI applications for patient screening demonstrated strong performance, achieving a pooled sensitivity of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.84-0.95) and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.72-0.85). AI tools employed for eligibility identification and classification also exhibited strong outcomes, with pooled sensitivities of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.76-0.84) and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.84-0.96), respectively, and precisions of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.80-0.88) and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.85-0.95). AI tools aimed at identifying patient cohorts showed moderate effectiveness (pooled sensitivity: 0.70 [95% CI: 0.52-0.84]; AUC: 0.74 [95% CI: 0.61-0.84]). Overall, AI presents significant potential for enhancing clinical trial recruitment and retention, with effectiveness varying across specific applications. These findings underscore AI's valuable role in improving trial efficiency and data quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":15529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"10 1","pages":"e98"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13312366/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2026.10743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recruitment and retention challenges continue to hinder the success of clinical trials. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising means to optimize various clinical trial processes; however, its impact specifically on recruitment and retention has not been comprehensively evaluated. This scoping review utilized the Joanna Briggs Institute framework and adhered to PRISMA-ScR guidelines, systematically searching literature published between January 2018 and June 2024 across multiple databases. Of the 21,573 records screened, 121 studies were included. A meta-analysis was conducted to quantitatively assess the performance of AI-driven tools. AI applications for patient screening demonstrated strong performance, achieving a pooled sensitivity of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.84-0.95) and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.72-0.85). AI tools employed for eligibility identification and classification also exhibited strong outcomes, with pooled sensitivities of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.76-0.84) and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.84-0.96), respectively, and precisions of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.80-0.88) and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.85-0.95). AI tools aimed at identifying patient cohorts showed moderate effectiveness (pooled sensitivity: 0.70 [95% CI: 0.52-0.84]; AUC: 0.74 [95% CI: 0.61-0.84]). Overall, AI presents significant potential for enhancing clinical trial recruitment and retention, with effectiveness varying across specific applications. These findings underscore AI's valuable role in improving trial efficiency and data quality.

人工智能在临床试验参与者招募和保留中的作用:范围回顾和荟萃分析。
招募和保留的挑战继续阻碍临床试验的成功。人工智能(AI)已经成为优化各种临床试验过程的一种有前途的手段;但是,它对征聘和留用的具体影响尚未得到全面评价。这项范围审查利用了乔安娜布里格斯研究所的框架,并遵循PRISMA-ScR指南,在多个数据库中系统地检索了2018年1月至2024年6月之间发表的文献。在筛选的21,573份记录中,包括121项研究。进行了一项荟萃分析,以定量评估人工智能驱动工具的性能。人工智能应用于患者筛查表现出很强的性能,实现了0.91 (95% CI: 0.84-0.95)的总灵敏度和0.79 (95% CI: 0.72-0.85)的曲线下面积(AUC)。用于资格鉴定和分类的人工智能工具也显示出强有力的结果,其综合灵敏度分别为0.80 (95% CI: 0.76-0.84)和0.92 (95% CI: 0.84-0.96),精密度为0.84 (95% CI: 0.80-0.88)和0.91 (95% CI: 0.85-0.95)。旨在识别患者队列的人工智能工具显示出中等效果(合并敏感性:0.70 [95% CI: 0.52-0.84]; AUC: 0.74 [95% CI: 0.61-0.84])。总体而言,人工智能在增强临床试验招募和保留方面具有巨大潜力,其有效性因具体应用而异。这些发现强调了人工智能在提高审判效率和数据质量方面的宝贵作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
26.90%
发文量
437
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书