Outcomes of donation after circulatory death heart transplant using normothermic regional perfusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Miao He, Xiaoqian Zhang, Huizhen Li, Yanchun Zhang, Qiming Zhao, Xiangyang Wu, Yongnan Li, Weina Pei
{"title":"Outcomes of donation after circulatory death heart transplant using normothermic regional perfusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Miao He, Xiaoqian Zhang, Huizhen Li, Yanchun Zhang, Qiming Zhao, Xiangyang Wu, Yongnan Li, Weina Pei","doi":"10.1007/s10047-026-01568-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to synthesize evidence comparing normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) and direct procurement and perfusion (DPP) in donation after circulatory death (DCD) heart transplantation, providing evidence-based guidance for optimizing donor heart procurement and transplantation protocols. A systematic literature review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were systematically searched. Two reviewers independently applied eligibility criteria, evaluated quality, and extracted data. The primary outcome was the 30-day survival rate. The 30-day survival rates for NRP and DPP patients were 96.58% and 94.79%, respectively (odds ratio [OR]: 1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-2.17, P = 0.02). Severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD) rates for NRP and DPP patients were 7.90% and 14.03%, respectively (P = 0.002), while the combined rate of none/mild PGD was 86.36% and 85.84% for each group. The cumulative postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation rate for NRP patients was 6.54%, compared to 17.18% for DPP patients (P = 0.0001). The postoperative intra-aortic balloon pump rate for NRP patients was 9.09%, compared to 17.78% for DPP patients (P = 0.35). NRP patients had a higher likelihood of being discharged home than DPP patients (P = 0.36), while NRP patients had a lower likelihood of being discharged from the intensive care unit than DPP patients (P = 0.71). NRP was associated with higher 30-day survival, which is a promising clinical approach in the application of DCD donor hearts.</p>","PeriodicalId":15177,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Artificial Organs","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Artificial Organs","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-026-01568-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to synthesize evidence comparing normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) and direct procurement and perfusion (DPP) in donation after circulatory death (DCD) heart transplantation, providing evidence-based guidance for optimizing donor heart procurement and transplantation protocols. A systematic literature review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were systematically searched. Two reviewers independently applied eligibility criteria, evaluated quality, and extracted data. The primary outcome was the 30-day survival rate. The 30-day survival rates for NRP and DPP patients were 96.58% and 94.79%, respectively (odds ratio [OR]: 1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-2.17, P = 0.02). Severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD) rates for NRP and DPP patients were 7.90% and 14.03%, respectively (P = 0.002), while the combined rate of none/mild PGD was 86.36% and 85.84% for each group. The cumulative postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation rate for NRP patients was 6.54%, compared to 17.18% for DPP patients (P = 0.0001). The postoperative intra-aortic balloon pump rate for NRP patients was 9.09%, compared to 17.78% for DPP patients (P = 0.35). NRP patients had a higher likelihood of being discharged home than DPP patients (P = 0.36), while NRP patients had a lower likelihood of being discharged from the intensive care unit than DPP patients (P = 0.71). NRP was associated with higher 30-day survival, which is a promising clinical approach in the application of DCD donor hearts.

常温区域灌注的循环死亡心脏移植后捐献的结果:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在综合比较常温区域灌注(NRP)和直接获取和灌注(DPP)在循环死亡(DCD)心脏移植后捐赠中的证据,为优化供体心脏获取和移植方案提供循证指导。根据PRISMA指南进行了系统的文献综述。系统检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和国际临床试验注册平台。两位审稿人独立应用资格标准,评估质量,并提取数据。主要观察指标为30天生存率。NRP和DPP患者的30天生存率分别为96.58%和94.79%(优势比[OR]: 1.52, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.06 ~ 2.17, P = 0.02)。NRP和DPP患者严重原发性移植物功能障碍(PGD)发生率分别为7.90%和14.03% (P = 0.002),两组无/轻度PGD发生率分别为86.36%和85.84%。NRP患者术后累计体外膜氧合率为6.54%,而DPP患者为17.18% (P = 0.0001)。NRP患者术后主动脉内球囊泵送率为9.09%,而DPP患者术后球囊泵送率为17.78% (P = 0.35)。NRP患者出院的可能性高于DPP患者(P = 0.36),而NRP患者出院的可能性低于DPP患者(P = 0.71)。NRP与较高的30天生存率相关,这是DCD供体心脏应用的一种有前景的临床方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Artificial Organs
Journal of Artificial Organs 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Artificial Organs is to introduce to colleagues worldwide a broad spectrum of important new achievements in the field of artificial organs, ranging from fundamental research to clinical applications. The scope of the Journal of Artificial Organs encompasses but is not restricted to blood purification, cardiovascular intervention, biomaterials, and artificial metabolic organs. Additionally, the journal will cover technical and industrial innovations. Membership in the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs is not a prerequisite for submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书