In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Detection Performance Analysis and Comparison on Effective Feature Selection

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Tianxin Jiang, Junbiao Liu, Dinghan Hu, Mengyuan Diao, Jiuwen Cao
{"title":"In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Detection Performance Analysis and Comparison on Effective Feature Selection","authors":"Tianxin Jiang,&nbsp;Junbiao Liu,&nbsp;Dinghan Hu,&nbsp;Mengyuan Diao,&nbsp;Jiuwen Cao","doi":"10.1002/clc.70395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>How to reduce the occurrence of in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA), screen potential IHCA patients, and advance the treatment of IHCA are urgent problems to be solved in clinic. In this study, we tried to develop a model to predict whether patients will develop IHCA based on the data of patients who have just been admitted to hospital and evaluate the influence of different feature selection methods on machine learning (ML) models.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 25 149 patients were included in the study; 320 developed IHCA. We chose three feature selection methods (Student's <i>t</i>-test and Chi-square test, regression analysis and correlation analysis) and four ML models (AdaBoost, XGBoost, Random Forest, and Logistic Regression). Each ML model was trained and evaluated using raw and feature-selected data; as a result, we got 16 models. AUROC, AUPRC, accuracy, recall, precision, and specificity are used to evaluate the model. The XGBoost model has the best performance with an AUROC of 0.987 (95% CI 0.984–0.988), an AUPRC of 0.763, an accuracy of 0.992, a recall of 0.695, a precision of 0.723, and a specificity of 0.996. The most significant predictors are age, albumin, sinus arrhythmia, activated partial thromboplastin time, and protein.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Different feature selection methods have different effects on different ML models. The predictive model developed using the XGBoost algorithm is the best predictor of whether patients will develop IHCA.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10201,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cardiology","volume":"49 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/clc.70395","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clc.70395","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

How to reduce the occurrence of in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA), screen potential IHCA patients, and advance the treatment of IHCA are urgent problems to be solved in clinic. In this study, we tried to develop a model to predict whether patients will develop IHCA based on the data of patients who have just been admitted to hospital and evaluate the influence of different feature selection methods on machine learning (ML) models.

Methods and Results

A total of 25 149 patients were included in the study; 320 developed IHCA. We chose three feature selection methods (Student's t-test and Chi-square test, regression analysis and correlation analysis) and four ML models (AdaBoost, XGBoost, Random Forest, and Logistic Regression). Each ML model was trained and evaluated using raw and feature-selected data; as a result, we got 16 models. AUROC, AUPRC, accuracy, recall, precision, and specificity are used to evaluate the model. The XGBoost model has the best performance with an AUROC of 0.987 (95% CI 0.984–0.988), an AUPRC of 0.763, an accuracy of 0.992, a recall of 0.695, a precision of 0.723, and a specificity of 0.996. The most significant predictors are age, albumin, sinus arrhythmia, activated partial thromboplastin time, and protein.

Conclusions

Different feature selection methods have different effects on different ML models. The predictive model developed using the XGBoost algorithm is the best predictor of whether patients will develop IHCA.

Abstract Image

医院内心脏骤停检测性能分析及有效特征选择比较。
背景:如何减少院内心脏骤停(IHCA)的发生,筛选潜在的IHCA患者,推进IHCA的治疗,是临床迫切需要解决的问题。在本研究中,我们试图基于刚入院患者的数据建立一个预测患者是否会发展为IHCA的模型,并评估不同特征选择方法对机器学习(ML)模型的影响。方法与结果:共纳入25 149例患者;320例为IHCA。我们选择了三种特征选择方法(学生t检验和卡方检验,回归分析和相关分析)和四种机器学习模型(AdaBoost, XGBoost, Random Forest和Logistic回归)。使用原始数据和特征选择数据对每个ML模型进行训练和评估;结果,我们有16个模型。使用AUROC、AUPRC、准确率、召回率、精密度和特异性来评估模型。XGBoost模型的AUROC为0.987 (95% CI 0.984 ~ 0.988), AUPRC为0.763,准确率为0.992,召回率为0.695,精密度为0.723,特异性为0.996。最重要的预测因素是年龄、白蛋白、窦性心律失常、活化部分凝血活酶时间和蛋白。结论:不同的特征选择方法对不同的ML模型有不同的影响。使用XGBoost算法开发的预测模型是患者是否会发展为IHCA的最佳预测器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Cardiology
Clinical Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
189
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Cardiology provides a fully Gold Open Access forum for the publication of original clinical research, as well as brief reviews of diagnostic and therapeutic issues in cardiovascular medicine and cardiovascular surgery. The journal includes Clinical Investigations, Reviews, free standing editorials and commentaries, and bonus online-only content. The journal also publishes supplements, Expert Panel Discussions, sponsored clinical Reviews, Trial Designs, and Quality and Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书