Establishing an Apheresis Medicine Program in a Resource-Constrained Setting: A 5-Year Experience From Lagos, Nigeria.

IF 1.2
Folasade Adelekan-Popoola, Shakirat Gold-Olufadi, Olufunto Olufela Kalejaiye, Abdullateef Ogala, Rasheed A Balogun
{"title":"Establishing an Apheresis Medicine Program in a Resource-Constrained Setting: A 5-Year Experience From Lagos, Nigeria.","authors":"Folasade Adelekan-Popoola, Shakirat Gold-Olufadi, Olufunto Olufela Kalejaiye, Abdullateef Ogala, Rasheed A Balogun","doi":"10.1002/1744-9987.70176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Establishing a comprehensive apheresis medicine program in a resource-constrained setting presents significant structural, financial, and logistical challenges. Despite the growing clinical importance of apheresis services globally, published experience from sub-Saharan Africa remains sparse. This study describes the 5-year operational experience of building and sustaining an Apheresis Medicine program at Next Hematology Medicare, a private hematology center in Lagos, Nigeria, including the challenges encountered, solutions implemented, and clinical outcomes achieved.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of all apheresis procedures performed between May 2020 and December 2025 was conducted. Therapeutic apheresis procedures included automated red cell exchange transfusion (RCE), therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) and leukocytapheresis. Donor apheresis procedures comprised single-donor apheresis platelet collections for transfusion and stem cell collection (SCC) by donors. Data on patient demographics, clinical indications, procedural outcomes, and geographic distribution of platelet delivery were collected and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2405 apheresis procedures were performed over the 5-year period. Donor apheresis platelet (AP) collection was the most frequently performed procedure (n = 1772; 73.7%), followed by RCE (n = 617; 25.7%) as the most common therapeutic apheresis modality. TPE accounted for 12 procedures (n = 12; 0.5%), while leukocytapheresis (n = 2; < 0.1%) and SCC (n = 1; < 0.1%) were performed infrequently. For AP, Sepsis/DIC was the leading transfusion indication (n = 968; 54.6%). RCE was performed predominantly for patients with sickle cell anemia (SCA), with intractable recurrent vaso-occlusive crises (VOC) being the most common indication (n = 382; 61.9%). RCE significantly reduced hemoglobin S (HbS%) from 93.13% ± 12.4% to 18.74% ± 4.2% (p < 0.001) and improved hematocrit from 16.34% ± 3.5% to 26.01% ± 4.2% (p < 0.001). TPE was primarily indicated for neurological and transplant-related conditions. Apheresis platelets were distributed nationally across all six geopolitical zones and internationally.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A fully functional Apheresis Medicine program can be successfully established and sustained in a resource-constrained low- and middle-income country (LMIC) setting, delivering outcomes comparable to high-income country benchmarks. RCE showed significant hematological benefits for patients with SCA, and donor apheresis platelet delivery extended care across all Nigerian geopolitical zones. The operational framework described here, addressing funding, infrastructure, staffing, licensing, and blood safety, provides a possibly replicable model for Apheresis Medicine program development across sub-Saharan Africa.</p>","PeriodicalId":94253,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/1744-9987.70176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Establishing a comprehensive apheresis medicine program in a resource-constrained setting presents significant structural, financial, and logistical challenges. Despite the growing clinical importance of apheresis services globally, published experience from sub-Saharan Africa remains sparse. This study describes the 5-year operational experience of building and sustaining an Apheresis Medicine program at Next Hematology Medicare, a private hematology center in Lagos, Nigeria, including the challenges encountered, solutions implemented, and clinical outcomes achieved.

Methods: A retrospective review of all apheresis procedures performed between May 2020 and December 2025 was conducted. Therapeutic apheresis procedures included automated red cell exchange transfusion (RCE), therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) and leukocytapheresis. Donor apheresis procedures comprised single-donor apheresis platelet collections for transfusion and stem cell collection (SCC) by donors. Data on patient demographics, clinical indications, procedural outcomes, and geographic distribution of platelet delivery were collected and analyzed.

Results: A total of 2405 apheresis procedures were performed over the 5-year period. Donor apheresis platelet (AP) collection was the most frequently performed procedure (n = 1772; 73.7%), followed by RCE (n = 617; 25.7%) as the most common therapeutic apheresis modality. TPE accounted for 12 procedures (n = 12; 0.5%), while leukocytapheresis (n = 2; < 0.1%) and SCC (n = 1; < 0.1%) were performed infrequently. For AP, Sepsis/DIC was the leading transfusion indication (n = 968; 54.6%). RCE was performed predominantly for patients with sickle cell anemia (SCA), with intractable recurrent vaso-occlusive crises (VOC) being the most common indication (n = 382; 61.9%). RCE significantly reduced hemoglobin S (HbS%) from 93.13% ± 12.4% to 18.74% ± 4.2% (p < 0.001) and improved hematocrit from 16.34% ± 3.5% to 26.01% ± 4.2% (p < 0.001). TPE was primarily indicated for neurological and transplant-related conditions. Apheresis platelets were distributed nationally across all six geopolitical zones and internationally.

Conclusion: A fully functional Apheresis Medicine program can be successfully established and sustained in a resource-constrained low- and middle-income country (LMIC) setting, delivering outcomes comparable to high-income country benchmarks. RCE showed significant hematological benefits for patients with SCA, and donor apheresis platelet delivery extended care across all Nigerian geopolitical zones. The operational framework described here, addressing funding, infrastructure, staffing, licensing, and blood safety, provides a possibly replicable model for Apheresis Medicine program development across sub-Saharan Africa.

在资源受限的环境下建立采血医学项目:尼日利亚拉各斯的5年经验。
背景:在资源有限的环境下建立一个全面的采血医学项目提出了重大的结构、财政和后勤挑战。尽管全球采血服务的临床重要性日益增加,但撒哈拉以南非洲发表的经验仍然很少。本研究描述了在尼日利亚拉各斯的一家私营血液学中心Next Hematology Medicare建立和维持单采医学项目的5年运营经验,包括遇到的挑战、实施的解决方案和取得的临床结果。方法:对2020年5月至2025年12月间进行的所有采血手术进行回顾性分析。治疗性血浆分离包括自动红细胞交换输血(RCE)、治疗性血浆交换(TPE)和白细胞分离。供者单采程序包括供输血的单采血小板收集和供者的干细胞收集(SCC)。收集和分析了患者人口统计学、临床适应症、手术结果和血小板输送的地理分布数据。结果:5年内共进行了2405次采血手术。供体单采血小板(AP)采集是最常见的方法(n = 1772, 73.7%),其次是RCE (n = 617, 25.7%)是最常见的治疗单采方式。结论:在资源受限的低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC),一个功能齐全的单采医学项目可以成功地建立和维持,其结果可与高收入国家的基准相媲美。RCE对SCA患者的血液学有显著的益处,供体采血小板输送扩展了尼日利亚所有地缘政治地区的护理。本文描述的操作框架涉及资金、基础设施、人员配备、许可和血液安全,为撒哈拉以南非洲地区的单采医学项目发展提供了一个可能的可复制模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书