A cluster randomized trial of a combined Mental Health Literacy (MHL) and Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) classroom-based intervention.

IF 1.8
Jennifer Katz, Jungah Lee, Sarah Y Skinner, Sterett Mercer, Adetunji Noah Adekunle, Sarah Grace Friesen
{"title":"A cluster randomized trial of a combined Mental Health Literacy (MHL) and Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) classroom-based intervention.","authors":"Jennifer Katz, Jungah Lee, Sarah Y Skinner, Sterett Mercer, Adetunji Noah Adekunle, Sarah Grace Friesen","doi":"10.1037/spq0000751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A pan-Canadian cluster randomized trial (by classroom) was conducted to examine the effects of a combined mental health literacy and dialectical behavior therapy skills program implemented by teachers on protective factors related to social and emotional well-being, including mindfulness, emotion regulation, inclusive education, distress tolerance, mental health knowledge, reduction of stigma, and help-seeking skills. The sample of 111 classrooms drawn from three urban centers and 67 schools, which were randomly assigned to intervention or control, included 1,750 students in third- to 12th-grade classrooms. Student-reported measures of mindfulness, emotion regulation, inclusive education, distress tolerance, mental health literacy, and classroom climate were collected three times in the year (October, February, and June). Teachers recorded dosage and fidelity data, and in-class observations took place to support implementation data. Results indicated the intervention classrooms demonstrated statistically significant improvements relative to the changes in the control classrooms on six of eight dependent variables: mindfulness, emotion regulation, impulse control, strategies, beliefs about mental illness, and stigma. Effect sizes were large for mindfulness, medium for emotion regulation and stigma, and small for impulse control and beliefs about mental illness. There was no evidence that intervention effects were moderated by intervention site, school level, or student characteristics related to Indigenous heritage, gender, or whether students received English language learner services. By contrast, the mid- to postintervention effect on mindfulness differed for students receiving special education services, such that effects were greater for students receiving special education services compared to students not receiving special education services. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74763,"journal":{"name":"School psychology (Washington, D.C.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School psychology (Washington, D.C.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A pan-Canadian cluster randomized trial (by classroom) was conducted to examine the effects of a combined mental health literacy and dialectical behavior therapy skills program implemented by teachers on protective factors related to social and emotional well-being, including mindfulness, emotion regulation, inclusive education, distress tolerance, mental health knowledge, reduction of stigma, and help-seeking skills. The sample of 111 classrooms drawn from three urban centers and 67 schools, which were randomly assigned to intervention or control, included 1,750 students in third- to 12th-grade classrooms. Student-reported measures of mindfulness, emotion regulation, inclusive education, distress tolerance, mental health literacy, and classroom climate were collected three times in the year (October, February, and June). Teachers recorded dosage and fidelity data, and in-class observations took place to support implementation data. Results indicated the intervention classrooms demonstrated statistically significant improvements relative to the changes in the control classrooms on six of eight dependent variables: mindfulness, emotion regulation, impulse control, strategies, beliefs about mental illness, and stigma. Effect sizes were large for mindfulness, medium for emotion regulation and stigma, and small for impulse control and beliefs about mental illness. There was no evidence that intervention effects were moderated by intervention site, school level, or student characteristics related to Indigenous heritage, gender, or whether students received English language learner services. By contrast, the mid- to postintervention effect on mindfulness differed for students receiving special education services, such that effects were greater for students receiving special education services compared to students not receiving special education services. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

心理健康素养(MHL)与辩证行为疗法(DBT)课堂干预相结合的聚类随机试验。
本研究采用全加拿大随机聚类试验(按课堂进行),考察教师实施的心理健康素养和辩证行为治疗技能联合项目对社会和情感健康相关保护因素的影响,包括正念、情绪调节、全纳教育、痛苦容忍、心理健康知识、减少耻辱感和寻求帮助技能。从三个城市中心和67所学校抽取的111个教室作为样本,随机分为干预组和对照组,其中包括1,750名三年级到12年级的学生。每年(10月、2月和6月)三次收集学生报告的正念、情绪调节、全纳教育、痛苦容忍、心理健康素养和课堂气氛的测量结果。教师记录剂量和保真度数据,并在课堂上进行观察以支持实施数据。结果表明,干预教室在正念、情绪调节、冲动控制、策略、对精神疾病的信念和耻耻感等8个因变量中的6个方面,与对照组教室相比,在统计学上有显著的改善。正念的效应量大,情绪调节和耻辱的效应量中等,冲动控制和对精神疾病的信念的效应量小。没有证据表明干预效果会受到干预地点、学校水平、与土著文化遗产、性别相关的学生特征或学生是否接受英语学习者服务的影响。相比之下,接受特殊教育服务的学生在正念的干预中期和干预后的影响有所不同,接受特殊教育服务的学生比未接受特殊教育服务的学生的影响更大。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书