Christine Joyce, Mohammad Adam Kassar, Alexandria Knecht, Melissa Jung, Joe Joseph, Justin McCloskey, Jarunee Intrapiromkul, Dhairya A Lakhani, Tyler McGaughey
{"title":"Bringing light to the reading room.","authors":"Christine Joyce, Mohammad Adam Kassar, Alexandria Knecht, Melissa Jung, Joe Joseph, Justin McCloskey, Jarunee Intrapiromkul, Dhairya A Lakhani, Tyler McGaughey","doi":"10.3389/fradi.2026.1821486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>According to the American College of Radiology (ACR) Technical Standard Guidelines, there is a recommended illuminance level for reading rooms set between 25 and 75 lux. However, these guidelines are based on studies completed in 2007-2009, which predate significant advancements in display technology. No recent study has re-evaluated these lighting conditions, and more specifically, no prior studies have examined the effects of ambient lighting on the detection of intracranial hemorrhage on non-contrast brain CT.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if higher ambient lighting levels (> 400 lux) significantly effects the diagnostic accuracy of board-certified neuroradiologists in detecting intracranial hemorrhage on brain CT, compared with standard low-light reading room conditions (20-70 lux).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-two standard-of-care non-contrast head CT scans (axial acquisitions with coronal/sagittal reformats) from a tertiary-care hospital were selected by two independent neuroradiologists. These neuroradiologists established the presence or absence of intracranial hemorrhage. Four additional board-certified neuroradiologists independently interpreted all cases twice: first in a brightly lit environment (> 400 lux, measured at desktop level) and, after a > 6-month washout period to minimize recognition memory bias, in a standard reading room (20-70 lux). Interpretations were performed on calibrated Barco MDNC-3421 displays using the institutional Fuji PACS. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated for each condition and compared using paired two-tailed t-tests with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant differences were found between bright and dark conditions for sensitivity (0.974 vs. 0.974, <i>p</i> = 1.00), specificity (0.978 vs. 1.0, <i>p</i> = 0.49 adjusted), or overall accuracy (0.976 vs. 0.988, <i>p</i> = 1.00 adjusted).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Increased ambient lighting levels (> 400 lux) do not significantly affect the ability of board-certified neuroradiologists to accurately detect intracranial hemorrhage on modern high-resolution displays. These findings suggest that current guidelines should be re-evaluated with recent improvements in technology. Larger multi-center studies are warranted to confirm these results across additional pathologies and modalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":73101,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in radiology","volume":"6 ","pages":"1821486"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13303713/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fradi.2026.1821486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: According to the American College of Radiology (ACR) Technical Standard Guidelines, there is a recommended illuminance level for reading rooms set between 25 and 75 lux. However, these guidelines are based on studies completed in 2007-2009, which predate significant advancements in display technology. No recent study has re-evaluated these lighting conditions, and more specifically, no prior studies have examined the effects of ambient lighting on the detection of intracranial hemorrhage on non-contrast brain CT.
Objective: To determine if higher ambient lighting levels (> 400 lux) significantly effects the diagnostic accuracy of board-certified neuroradiologists in detecting intracranial hemorrhage on brain CT, compared with standard low-light reading room conditions (20-70 lux).
Methods: Forty-two standard-of-care non-contrast head CT scans (axial acquisitions with coronal/sagittal reformats) from a tertiary-care hospital were selected by two independent neuroradiologists. These neuroradiologists established the presence or absence of intracranial hemorrhage. Four additional board-certified neuroradiologists independently interpreted all cases twice: first in a brightly lit environment (> 400 lux, measured at desktop level) and, after a > 6-month washout period to minimize recognition memory bias, in a standard reading room (20-70 lux). Interpretations were performed on calibrated Barco MDNC-3421 displays using the institutional Fuji PACS. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated for each condition and compared using paired two-tailed t-tests with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.
Results: No statistically significant differences were found between bright and dark conditions for sensitivity (0.974 vs. 0.974, p = 1.00), specificity (0.978 vs. 1.0, p = 0.49 adjusted), or overall accuracy (0.976 vs. 0.988, p = 1.00 adjusted).
Conclusion: Increased ambient lighting levels (> 400 lux) do not significantly affect the ability of board-certified neuroradiologists to accurately detect intracranial hemorrhage on modern high-resolution displays. These findings suggest that current guidelines should be re-evaluated with recent improvements in technology. Larger multi-center studies are warranted to confirm these results across additional pathologies and modalities.