Bringing light to the reading room.

IF 4
Frontiers in radiology Pub Date : 2026-06-12 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fradi.2026.1821486
Christine Joyce, Mohammad Adam Kassar, Alexandria Knecht, Melissa Jung, Joe Joseph, Justin McCloskey, Jarunee Intrapiromkul, Dhairya A Lakhani, Tyler McGaughey
{"title":"Bringing light to the reading room.","authors":"Christine Joyce, Mohammad Adam Kassar, Alexandria Knecht, Melissa Jung, Joe Joseph, Justin McCloskey, Jarunee Intrapiromkul, Dhairya A Lakhani, Tyler McGaughey","doi":"10.3389/fradi.2026.1821486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>According to the American College of Radiology (ACR) Technical Standard Guidelines, there is a recommended illuminance level for reading rooms set between 25 and 75 lux. However, these guidelines are based on studies completed in 2007-2009, which predate significant advancements in display technology. No recent study has re-evaluated these lighting conditions, and more specifically, no prior studies have examined the effects of ambient lighting on the detection of intracranial hemorrhage on non-contrast brain CT.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if higher ambient lighting levels (> 400 lux) significantly effects the diagnostic accuracy of board-certified neuroradiologists in detecting intracranial hemorrhage on brain CT, compared with standard low-light reading room conditions (20-70 lux).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-two standard-of-care non-contrast head CT scans (axial acquisitions with coronal/sagittal reformats) from a tertiary-care hospital were selected by two independent neuroradiologists. These neuroradiologists established the presence or absence of intracranial hemorrhage. Four additional board-certified neuroradiologists independently interpreted all cases twice: first in a brightly lit environment (> 400 lux, measured at desktop level) and, after a > 6-month washout period to minimize recognition memory bias, in a standard reading room (20-70 lux). Interpretations were performed on calibrated Barco MDNC-3421 displays using the institutional Fuji PACS. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated for each condition and compared using paired two-tailed t-tests with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant differences were found between bright and dark conditions for sensitivity (0.974 vs. 0.974, <i>p</i> = 1.00), specificity (0.978 vs. 1.0, <i>p</i> = 0.49 adjusted), or overall accuracy (0.976 vs. 0.988, <i>p</i> = 1.00 adjusted).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Increased ambient lighting levels (> 400 lux) do not significantly affect the ability of board-certified neuroradiologists to accurately detect intracranial hemorrhage on modern high-resolution displays. These findings suggest that current guidelines should be re-evaluated with recent improvements in technology. Larger multi-center studies are warranted to confirm these results across additional pathologies and modalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":73101,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in radiology","volume":"6 ","pages":"1821486"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13303713/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fradi.2026.1821486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: According to the American College of Radiology (ACR) Technical Standard Guidelines, there is a recommended illuminance level for reading rooms set between 25 and 75 lux. However, these guidelines are based on studies completed in 2007-2009, which predate significant advancements in display technology. No recent study has re-evaluated these lighting conditions, and more specifically, no prior studies have examined the effects of ambient lighting on the detection of intracranial hemorrhage on non-contrast brain CT.

Objective: To determine if higher ambient lighting levels (> 400 lux) significantly effects the diagnostic accuracy of board-certified neuroradiologists in detecting intracranial hemorrhage on brain CT, compared with standard low-light reading room conditions (20-70 lux).

Methods: Forty-two standard-of-care non-contrast head CT scans (axial acquisitions with coronal/sagittal reformats) from a tertiary-care hospital were selected by two independent neuroradiologists. These neuroradiologists established the presence or absence of intracranial hemorrhage. Four additional board-certified neuroradiologists independently interpreted all cases twice: first in a brightly lit environment (> 400 lux, measured at desktop level) and, after a > 6-month washout period to minimize recognition memory bias, in a standard reading room (20-70 lux). Interpretations were performed on calibrated Barco MDNC-3421 displays using the institutional Fuji PACS. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated for each condition and compared using paired two-tailed t-tests with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.

Results: No statistically significant differences were found between bright and dark conditions for sensitivity (0.974 vs. 0.974, p = 1.00), specificity (0.978 vs. 1.0, p = 0.49 adjusted), or overall accuracy (0.976 vs. 0.988, p = 1.00 adjusted).

Conclusion: Increased ambient lighting levels (> 400 lux) do not significantly affect the ability of board-certified neuroradiologists to accurately detect intracranial hemorrhage on modern high-resolution displays. These findings suggest that current guidelines should be re-evaluated with recent improvements in technology. Larger multi-center studies are warranted to confirm these results across additional pathologies and modalities.

给阅览室带来光明。
背景:根据美国放射学会(ACR)技术标准指南,推荐阅览室的照度在25 - 75勒克斯之间。然而,这些指导方针是基于2007-2009年完成的研究,这早于显示技术的重大进步。最近没有研究重新评估这些照明条件,更具体地说,之前没有研究检查环境照明对非对比脑CT检测颅内出血的影响。目的:探讨与标准低光阅读室条件(20-70勒克斯)相比,较高的环境光照水平(> - 400勒克斯)是否显著影响神经放射科医师在脑CT上检测颅内出血的诊断准确性。方法:由两名独立的神经放射科医生从一家三级医院选择42张标准照护的非对比头部CT扫描(轴向获得冠状/矢状面重新格式化)。这些神经放射学家确定颅内出血的存在或不存在。另外四名获得委员会认证的神经放射学家独立解释了所有病例两次:第一次是在明亮的环境中(bbbb400勒克斯,在桌面水平测量),第二次是在b> 6个月的洗脱期后,在标准阅览室(20-70勒克斯),以尽量减少识别记忆偏差。使用机构富士PACS在校准的Barco mnc -3421显示器上进行判读。计算每种情况的敏感性、特异性和准确性,并使用配对双尾t检验进行比较,并对多重比较进行Bonferroni校正。结果:在明亮和黑暗条件下,灵敏度(0.974比0.974,p = 1.00)、特异性(0.978比1.0,p = 0.49调整后)和总体准确度(0.976比0.988,p = 1.00调整后)均无统计学差异。结论:增加环境光照水平(> 400勒克斯)不会显著影响委员会认证的神经放射科医生在现代高分辨率显示器上准确检测颅内出血的能力。这些发现表明,随着最近技术的进步,目前的指导方针应该重新评估。更大规模的多中心研究是有必要的,以证实这些结果跨越其他病理和模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书