Clinical Practice of the Proactive Health Concept in Chronic Disease Management: A Qualitative Study from the Perspective of Neurology Medical Staff.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2026-06-22 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S607825
Xiaoyun Xu, Yanlin Chen, Ying Zhang, Lie Lu
{"title":"Clinical Practice of the Proactive Health Concept in Chronic Disease Management: A Qualitative Study from the Perspective of Neurology Medical Staff.","authors":"Xiaoyun Xu, Yanlin Chen, Ying Zhang, Lie Lu","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S607825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This qualitative study explores the understanding and clinical practice of the proactive health concept among neurology medical staff in managing chronic neurological disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 healthcare professionals from a tertiary hospital in China, and data were analyzed using Colaizzi's seven-step phenomenological method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five core themes emerged: (1) education and motivation as core strategies for promoting proactive health; (2) multidimensional factors influencing patient compliance, including cognition, emotion, and family support; (3) the dual role of medical tools and technologies in facilitating and hindering self-management; (4) the nascent state and mixed impact of external support systems such as patient groups and community services; and (5) systemic barriers including time constraints and lack of institutional support. Findings indicate that while medical staff recognize the value of proactive health, its implementation is hindered by individual patient differences, limited clinical resources, and underdeveloped external systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlights the need for a multi-level support environment involving institutional, policy, societal, and technological dimensions to enable the effective integration of proactive health into chronic disease management.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"19 ","pages":"607825"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13309618/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S607825","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This qualitative study explores the understanding and clinical practice of the proactive health concept among neurology medical staff in managing chronic neurological disorders.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 healthcare professionals from a tertiary hospital in China, and data were analyzed using Colaizzi's seven-step phenomenological method.

Results: Five core themes emerged: (1) education and motivation as core strategies for promoting proactive health; (2) multidimensional factors influencing patient compliance, including cognition, emotion, and family support; (3) the dual role of medical tools and technologies in facilitating and hindering self-management; (4) the nascent state and mixed impact of external support systems such as patient groups and community services; and (5) systemic barriers including time constraints and lack of institutional support. Findings indicate that while medical staff recognize the value of proactive health, its implementation is hindered by individual patient differences, limited clinical resources, and underdeveloped external systems.

Conclusion: The study highlights the need for a multi-level support environment involving institutional, policy, societal, and technological dimensions to enable the effective integration of proactive health into chronic disease management.

主动健康理念在慢性病管理中的临床实践:基于神经内科医务人员视角的定性研究。
背景:本质性研究探讨神经内科医护人员在慢性神经系统疾病管理中对主动健康理念的理解和临床实践。方法:对国内某三级医院的15名医护人员进行半结构化访谈,采用Colaizzi的七步现象学方法对数据进行分析。结果:出现了五大核心主题:(1)教育和激励是促进主动健康的核心战略;(2)影响患者依从性的多维因素,包括认知、情绪和家庭支持;(3)医疗工具和技术在促进和阻碍自我管理方面的双重作用;(4)患者群体和社区服务等外部支持系统的初始状态和混合影响;(5)制度性障碍,包括时间限制和缺乏制度支持。研究结果表明,虽然医务人员认识到主动健康的价值,但其实施受到患者个体差异,临床资源有限和外部系统不发达的阻碍。结论:本研究强调需要一个包括制度、政策、社会和技术层面的多层次支持环境,以便将主动健康有效地整合到慢性病管理中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书