Victor Pokorny, Katherine Damme, Claudia M Haase, Matthew Goldrick, Vijay A Mittal
{"title":"Unique Challenges of Multidisciplinary Clinical Science: Perspectives from a Multidisciplinary Team.","authors":"Victor Pokorny, Katherine Damme, Claudia M Haase, Matthew Goldrick, Vijay A Mittal","doi":"10.1177/21677026251320322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical psychological research stands to benefit greatly from collaborations that incorporate perspectives from other disciplines. However, the challenges of such collaborative efforts are immense. This commentary provides the perspectives of five frequent collaborators from distinct disciplines (clinical psychology, linguistics, affective and developmental science, vision science, and cognitive neuroscience). We outline three overarching challenges we have encountered during our collaborations: disciplinary bias (i.e., implicit and explicit beliefs about the best ways to gain knowledge), lack of multidisciplinary fluency (i.e., difficulty effectively communicating across disciplines), and inherent risk (i.e., the speculative nature and uncertain career prospects of multidisciplinary work). We then discuss potential solutions to these challenges. We hope that by sharing our experiences and insights, we can promote more productive and impactful clinical science.</p>","PeriodicalId":54234,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychological Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13308685/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychological Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026251320322","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Clinical psychological research stands to benefit greatly from collaborations that incorporate perspectives from other disciplines. However, the challenges of such collaborative efforts are immense. This commentary provides the perspectives of five frequent collaborators from distinct disciplines (clinical psychology, linguistics, affective and developmental science, vision science, and cognitive neuroscience). We outline three overarching challenges we have encountered during our collaborations: disciplinary bias (i.e., implicit and explicit beliefs about the best ways to gain knowledge), lack of multidisciplinary fluency (i.e., difficulty effectively communicating across disciplines), and inherent risk (i.e., the speculative nature and uncertain career prospects of multidisciplinary work). We then discuss potential solutions to these challenges. We hope that by sharing our experiences and insights, we can promote more productive and impactful clinical science.
期刊介绍:
The Association for Psychological Science’s journal, Clinical Psychological Science, emerges from this confluence to provide readers with the best, most innovative research in clinical psychological science, giving researchers of all stripes a home for their work and a place in which to communicate with a broad audience of both clinical and other scientists.