Unique Challenges of Multidisciplinary Clinical Science: Perspectives from a Multidisciplinary Team.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Victor Pokorny, Katherine Damme, Claudia M Haase, Matthew Goldrick, Vijay A Mittal
{"title":"Unique Challenges of Multidisciplinary Clinical Science: Perspectives from a Multidisciplinary Team.","authors":"Victor Pokorny, Katherine Damme, Claudia M Haase, Matthew Goldrick, Vijay A Mittal","doi":"10.1177/21677026251320322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical psychological research stands to benefit greatly from collaborations that incorporate perspectives from other disciplines. However, the challenges of such collaborative efforts are immense. This commentary provides the perspectives of five frequent collaborators from distinct disciplines (clinical psychology, linguistics, affective and developmental science, vision science, and cognitive neuroscience). We outline three overarching challenges we have encountered during our collaborations: disciplinary bias (i.e., implicit and explicit beliefs about the best ways to gain knowledge), lack of multidisciplinary fluency (i.e., difficulty effectively communicating across disciplines), and inherent risk (i.e., the speculative nature and uncertain career prospects of multidisciplinary work). We then discuss potential solutions to these challenges. We hope that by sharing our experiences and insights, we can promote more productive and impactful clinical science.</p>","PeriodicalId":54234,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychological Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13308685/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychological Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026251320322","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical psychological research stands to benefit greatly from collaborations that incorporate perspectives from other disciplines. However, the challenges of such collaborative efforts are immense. This commentary provides the perspectives of five frequent collaborators from distinct disciplines (clinical psychology, linguistics, affective and developmental science, vision science, and cognitive neuroscience). We outline three overarching challenges we have encountered during our collaborations: disciplinary bias (i.e., implicit and explicit beliefs about the best ways to gain knowledge), lack of multidisciplinary fluency (i.e., difficulty effectively communicating across disciplines), and inherent risk (i.e., the speculative nature and uncertain career prospects of multidisciplinary work). We then discuss potential solutions to these challenges. We hope that by sharing our experiences and insights, we can promote more productive and impactful clinical science.

多学科临床科学的独特挑战:来自多学科团队的观点。
临床心理学研究将从结合其他学科观点的合作中受益匪浅。然而,这种合作努力的挑战是巨大的。这篇评论提供了来自不同学科(临床心理学,语言学,情感和发展科学,视觉科学和认知神经科学)的五位经常合作的观点。我们概述了我们在合作过程中遇到的三个主要挑战:学科偏见(即,关于获取知识的最佳方式的内隐和外显信念),缺乏多学科流畅性(即,难以有效地跨学科沟通),以及固有风险(即,多学科工作的投机性质和不确定的职业前景)。然后我们讨论这些挑战的潜在解决方案。我们希望通过分享我们的经验和见解,我们可以促进更有效和更有影响力的临床科学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Psychological Science
Clinical Psychological Science Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
2.10%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: The Association for Psychological Science’s journal, Clinical Psychological Science, emerges from this confluence to provide readers with the best, most innovative research in clinical psychological science, giving researchers of all stripes a home for their work and a place in which to communicate with a broad audience of both clinical and other scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书