Prenatal Attachment Inventory: Adaptation and Validation in the Indian Context.

IF 0.5 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
K Rajitha, Manish Kumar Verma, V Anand Mohan
{"title":"Prenatal Attachment Inventory: Adaptation and Validation in the Indian Context.","authors":"K Rajitha, Manish Kumar Verma, V Anand Mohan","doi":"10.1007/s13224-025-02210-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to translate and validate the Prenatal Attachment Inventory (PAI) into Malayalam to address a gap in Maternal-Fetal Attachment (MFA) research in India. The PAI was adapted based on John Bowlby's attachment theory and Mecca Cranley's Maternal-Fetal Attachment Scale (MFAS), incorporating expert feedback to reflect Indian cultural contexts better.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The translated PAI was administered to 250 pregnant women in Kerala. The translation process included adding three new items focused on maternal self-care, activities with the fetus, and resource usage, categorized as \"personal reflection.\" These additions, alongside original factors of anticipation, differentiation, and interaction, were validated by reviewers, resulting in a Content Validity Ratio of 0.95.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Initial Confirmatory Factor Analysis indicated a Comparative Fit Index (CFI) of 0.821, Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) of 0.791, Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR) of 0.0631, and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) of 0.0764. After removing four low-loading items, the revised model showed improved fit indices: CFI of 0.843, TLI of 0.811, SRMR of 0.0591, and RMSEA of 0.0802, with Akaike Information Criterion and Bayesian Information Criterion values decreasing to 9823 and 10,024.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Cronbach's alpha of 0.868 for the Malayalam PAI demonstrated strong internal consistency. This validated tool provides a reliable and culturally appropriate measure for MFA in India, supporting future research and interventions to enhance maternal and fetal health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India","volume":"76 3","pages":"226-232"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13294429/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-025-02210-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to translate and validate the Prenatal Attachment Inventory (PAI) into Malayalam to address a gap in Maternal-Fetal Attachment (MFA) research in India. The PAI was adapted based on John Bowlby's attachment theory and Mecca Cranley's Maternal-Fetal Attachment Scale (MFAS), incorporating expert feedback to reflect Indian cultural contexts better.

Methods: The translated PAI was administered to 250 pregnant women in Kerala. The translation process included adding three new items focused on maternal self-care, activities with the fetus, and resource usage, categorized as "personal reflection." These additions, alongside original factors of anticipation, differentiation, and interaction, were validated by reviewers, resulting in a Content Validity Ratio of 0.95.

Results: Initial Confirmatory Factor Analysis indicated a Comparative Fit Index (CFI) of 0.821, Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) of 0.791, Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR) of 0.0631, and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) of 0.0764. After removing four low-loading items, the revised model showed improved fit indices: CFI of 0.843, TLI of 0.811, SRMR of 0.0591, and RMSEA of 0.0802, with Akaike Information Criterion and Bayesian Information Criterion values decreasing to 9823 and 10,024.

Conclusion: The Cronbach's alpha of 0.868 for the Malayalam PAI demonstrated strong internal consistency. This validated tool provides a reliable and culturally appropriate measure for MFA in India, supporting future research and interventions to enhance maternal and fetal health outcomes.

产前依恋量表:适应和验证在印度的背景下。
背景:本研究旨在将产前依恋量表(PAI)翻译并验证为马拉雅拉姆语,以解决印度母胎依恋(MFA)研究的空白。PAI是根据John Bowlby的依恋理论和Mecca Cranley的母胎依恋量表(MFAS)进行改编的,并结合了专家的反馈以更好地反映印度文化背景。方法:对喀拉拉邦250例孕妇进行PAI翻译。翻译过程中增加了三个新项目,重点是母亲的自我护理、与胎儿的活动和资源使用,被归类为“个人反思”。这些添加的内容,以及预期、差异和交互的原始因素,经过了审稿人的验证,得到了0.95的内容效度比。结果:初步验证性因子分析显示,比较拟合指数(CFI)为0.821,塔克-刘易斯指数(TLI)为0.791,标准化均方根残差(SRMR)为0.0631,近似均方根误差(RMSEA)为0.0764。在剔除4个低负荷项目后,修正模型的拟合指标得到改善,CFI为0.843,TLI为0.811,SRMR为0.0591,RMSEA为0.0802,赤井信息准则和贝叶斯信息准则值分别降至9823和10024。结论:Malayalam PAI的Cronbach's alpha值为0.868,具有较强的内部一致性。这一经过验证的工具为印度的MFA提供了可靠和文化上适当的措施,支持未来的研究和干预措施,以提高孕产妇和胎儿的健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
124
期刊介绍: Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India (JOGI) is the official journal of the Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology Societies of India (FOGSI). This is a peer- reviewed journal and features articles pertaining to the field of obstetrics and gynecology. The Journal is published six times a year on a bimonthly basis. Articles contributed by clinicians involved in patient care and research, and basic science researchers are considered. It publishes clinical and basic research of all aspects of obstetrics and gynecology, community obstetrics and family welfare and subspecialty subjects including gynecological endoscopy, infertility, oncology and ultrasonography, provided they have scientific merit and represent an important advance in knowledge. The journal believes in diversity and welcomes and encourages relevant contributions from world over. The types of articles published are: ·         Original Article·         Case Report ·         Instrumentation and Techniques ·         Short Commentary ·         Correspondence (Letter to the Editor) ·         Pictorial Essay
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书