Proteinuric and Non-proteinuric Pre-eclampsia: A Comparative Analysis of Risk Factor Profile, Clinical Picture, Laboratory Parameters and Pregnancy Outcome.

IF 0.5 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Yalamanchali Sree Bhavya, Pramila Jena, Sirisha Voola, Bandita Panda, G Prasanna, Jyochnamayi Panda
{"title":"Proteinuric and Non-proteinuric Pre-eclampsia: A Comparative Analysis of Risk Factor Profile, Clinical Picture, Laboratory Parameters and Pregnancy Outcome.","authors":"Yalamanchali Sree Bhavya, Pramila Jena, Sirisha Voola, Bandita Panda, G Prasanna, Jyochnamayi Panda","doi":"10.1007/s13224-025-02223-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pre-eclampsia, a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy remains a challenge worldwide despite advance in the medical science and research due to its adverse impact on pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the clinical characteristics, sociodemographic risk factors and the pregnancy outcomes between proteinuric and non-proteinuric pre-eclampsia incorporating the revised definition.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A prospective observational study consisting of 147 case of pre-eclampsia as per ISSHP-2018 diagnostic criteria of which 91 (63.6%) with proteinuria and 52 (36.4%) were without proteinuria. The maternal characteristics and pregnancy outcome were studied in both the groups and analyzed using appropriate statistical method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Use of revised definition lead to 1.5% increase in the incidence of pre-eclampsia (PE). A significantly higher proportion of non-proteinuric PE were ≤ 30 years as compared to proteinuric PE (78.8% vs. 61.5%, <i>p</i> value: 0.033). The proteinuric PE had significantly higher mean systolic and mean arterial pressure (<i>p</i> value: 0.011), higher association with clinically severe disease (<i>p</i> value: 0.008), higher values of serum creatinine (<i>p</i> value: 0.024) and serum LDH levels (<i>p</i> value: 0.004), higher rate of growth retarded fetus (<i>p</i> value: 0.029), low birth weight (<i>p</i> value: 0.014) and peri-natal mortality (<i>p</i> value: 0.018) as compared to non-proteinuric PE. However, the binary logistic regression analysis failed to demonstrate any significant difference between the two groups in any of the maternal characteristics or pregnancy outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PE with or without proteinuria can be equally severe compromising the pregnancy outcome and hence demands for increase supervision and monitoring once diagnosis of PE is established.</p>","PeriodicalId":51563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India","volume":"76 3","pages":"233-241"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13294405/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-025-02223-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pre-eclampsia, a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy remains a challenge worldwide despite advance in the medical science and research due to its adverse impact on pregnancy.

Objectives: To compare the clinical characteristics, sociodemographic risk factors and the pregnancy outcomes between proteinuric and non-proteinuric pre-eclampsia incorporating the revised definition.

Methodology: A prospective observational study consisting of 147 case of pre-eclampsia as per ISSHP-2018 diagnostic criteria of which 91 (63.6%) with proteinuria and 52 (36.4%) were without proteinuria. The maternal characteristics and pregnancy outcome were studied in both the groups and analyzed using appropriate statistical method.

Results: Use of revised definition lead to 1.5% increase in the incidence of pre-eclampsia (PE). A significantly higher proportion of non-proteinuric PE were ≤ 30 years as compared to proteinuric PE (78.8% vs. 61.5%, p value: 0.033). The proteinuric PE had significantly higher mean systolic and mean arterial pressure (p value: 0.011), higher association with clinically severe disease (p value: 0.008), higher values of serum creatinine (p value: 0.024) and serum LDH levels (p value: 0.004), higher rate of growth retarded fetus (p value: 0.029), low birth weight (p value: 0.014) and peri-natal mortality (p value: 0.018) as compared to non-proteinuric PE. However, the binary logistic regression analysis failed to demonstrate any significant difference between the two groups in any of the maternal characteristics or pregnancy outcome measures.

Conclusion: PE with or without proteinuria can be equally severe compromising the pregnancy outcome and hence demands for increase supervision and monitoring once diagnosis of PE is established.

蛋白尿和非蛋白尿子痫前期:风险因素、临床表现、实验室参数和妊娠结局的比较分析
背景:先兆子痫是一种妊娠期高血压疾病,尽管医学和研究取得了进展,但由于其对妊娠的不利影响,在世界范围内仍然是一个挑战。目的:比较蛋白尿和非蛋白尿先兆子痫合并修订定义的临床特征、社会人口学危险因素和妊娠结局。方法:一项前瞻性观察研究,纳入147例先兆子痫患者,符合ISSHP-2018诊断标准,其中91例(63.6%)伴有蛋白尿,52例(36.4%)无蛋白尿。对两组产妇特征及妊娠结局进行分析,并采用相应的统计学方法进行分析。结果:使用修订后的定义导致子痫前期(PE)发生率增加1.5%。与蛋白尿PE相比,≤30岁的非蛋白尿PE比例明显更高(78.8% vs. 61.5%, p值:0.033)。与非蛋白尿PE相比,蛋白尿PE的平均收缩压和平均动脉压明显升高(p值:0.011),与临床严重疾病的相关性较高(p值:0.008),血清肌酐(p值:0.024)和血清LDH水平(p值:0.004)较高,胎儿生长迟缓率(p值:0.029),低出生体重(p值:0.014)和围产儿死亡率(p值:0.018)较高。然而,二元逻辑回归分析未能证明两组在任何母体特征或妊娠结局测量方面有任何显著差异。结论:PE伴蛋白尿或不伴蛋白尿均可严重影响妊娠结局,因此,一旦PE确诊,需要加强监督和监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
124
期刊介绍: Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India (JOGI) is the official journal of the Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology Societies of India (FOGSI). This is a peer- reviewed journal and features articles pertaining to the field of obstetrics and gynecology. The Journal is published six times a year on a bimonthly basis. Articles contributed by clinicians involved in patient care and research, and basic science researchers are considered. It publishes clinical and basic research of all aspects of obstetrics and gynecology, community obstetrics and family welfare and subspecialty subjects including gynecological endoscopy, infertility, oncology and ultrasonography, provided they have scientific merit and represent an important advance in knowledge. The journal believes in diversity and welcomes and encourages relevant contributions from world over. The types of articles published are: ·         Original Article·         Case Report ·         Instrumentation and Techniques ·         Short Commentary ·         Correspondence (Letter to the Editor) ·         Pictorial Essay
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书