A hybrid strategy of left atrial appendage closure on top of anticoagulation in patients with prior anticoagulation failure: a multicenter study.

IF 4.8 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Kamil Zieliński, Krzysztof Kaczmarek, Marek Grygier, Paweł Kralisz, Aleksander Strzelecki, Joanna Grygier, Krzysztof Struniawski, Maksymilian Mielczarek, Jerzy Pręgowski, Adam Witkowski, Marcin Demkow, Radosław Pracoń
{"title":"A hybrid strategy of left atrial appendage closure on top of anticoagulation in patients with prior anticoagulation failure: a multicenter study.","authors":"Kamil Zieliński, Krzysztof Kaczmarek, Marek Grygier, Paweł Kralisz, Aleksander Strzelecki, Joanna Grygier, Krzysztof Struniawski, Maksymilian Mielczarek, Jerzy Pręgowski, Adam Witkowski, Marcin Demkow, Radosław Pracoń","doi":"10.20452/pamw.17325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A hybrid strategy involving left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) followed by long‑term anticoagulation may be considered in patients experiencing thromboembolic events or LAA thrombus despite anticoagulant treatment (anticoagulation failure).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to report the adoption rate and outcomes of the hybrid strategy in patients treated with LAAC for thromboembolic indications at 5 centers in Poland.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>High‑volume Polish centers reported outcomes of LAAC after anticoagulation failure between the years 2014 and 2024. The hybrid strategy was compared with other pharmacotherapy regimens (nonhybrid strategy) with respect to thromboembolic events, device‑related thrombus (DRT), and major bleeding occurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 1625 patients undergoing LAAC procedures across 5 centers, 141 (8.7%) had a history of anticoagulation failure. The hybrid strategy was applied in 64 individuals (45%), and its rate increased from 0% in 2014 to 80% in 2024. As compared with the nonhybrid group, the patients treated with the hybrid strategy more often received newer‑generation occluders (98.4% vs 68.8%; P <0.001), had lower rates of prior bleeding (12.5% vs 35.1%; P = 0.003) and lower HAS‑BLED scores (median [interquartile range], 3 [2-3] vs 3 [2-4] points; P = 0.008), and more often had a history of LAA thrombus (23.4% vs 10.4%; P = 0.04) and left ventricular ejection fraction below 40% (18.8% vs 6.5%; P = 0.04). During a median 1.3‑year follow‑up, the hybrid strategy showed greater thromboembolic risk reduction relative to the CHA2DS2‑VASc-predicted rate (91% vs 60%; annualized event rates of 1.1% vs 5.5%), and greater major bleeding risk reduction relative to the HAS‑BLED-predicted rate (100% vs 73%; annualized rates of 0% vs 1.7%), with similar DRT rates (6.9% vs 6.8%; P >0.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with anticoagulant treatment failure, the hybrid strategy (LAAC + long‑term anticoagulation) is increasingly adopted and was associated with greater thromboembolic risk reduction, as compared with the standard nonhybrid strategy, without compromising the bleeding profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":49680,"journal":{"name":"Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej-Polish Archives of Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej-Polish Archives of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20452/pamw.17325","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: A hybrid strategy involving left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) followed by long‑term anticoagulation may be considered in patients experiencing thromboembolic events or LAA thrombus despite anticoagulant treatment (anticoagulation failure).

Objectives: We aimed to report the adoption rate and outcomes of the hybrid strategy in patients treated with LAAC for thromboembolic indications at 5 centers in Poland.

Patients and methods: High‑volume Polish centers reported outcomes of LAAC after anticoagulation failure between the years 2014 and 2024. The hybrid strategy was compared with other pharmacotherapy regimens (nonhybrid strategy) with respect to thromboembolic events, device‑related thrombus (DRT), and major bleeding occurrence.

Results: Out of 1625 patients undergoing LAAC procedures across 5 centers, 141 (8.7%) had a history of anticoagulation failure. The hybrid strategy was applied in 64 individuals (45%), and its rate increased from 0% in 2014 to 80% in 2024. As compared with the nonhybrid group, the patients treated with the hybrid strategy more often received newer‑generation occluders (98.4% vs 68.8%; P <0.001), had lower rates of prior bleeding (12.5% vs 35.1%; P = 0.003) and lower HAS‑BLED scores (median [interquartile range], 3 [2-3] vs 3 [2-4] points; P = 0.008), and more often had a history of LAA thrombus (23.4% vs 10.4%; P = 0.04) and left ventricular ejection fraction below 40% (18.8% vs 6.5%; P = 0.04). During a median 1.3‑year follow‑up, the hybrid strategy showed greater thromboembolic risk reduction relative to the CHA2DS2‑VASc-predicted rate (91% vs 60%; annualized event rates of 1.1% vs 5.5%), and greater major bleeding risk reduction relative to the HAS‑BLED-predicted rate (100% vs 73%; annualized rates of 0% vs 1.7%), with similar DRT rates (6.9% vs 6.8%; P >0.99).

Conclusions: In patients with anticoagulant treatment failure, the hybrid strategy (LAAC + long‑term anticoagulation) is increasingly adopted and was associated with greater thromboembolic risk reduction, as compared with the standard nonhybrid strategy, without compromising the bleeding profile.

先前抗凝失败患者左心耳闭合加抗凝的混合策略:一项多中心研究。
混合策略,定义为左心耳闭合(LAAC)后长期抗凝治疗,可考虑用于血栓栓塞事件或左心耳血栓患者,尽管抗凝治疗(抗凝失败)。目的:报告混合战略的采用和结果。患者和方法:2014年至2024年间,波兰大量中心报告了抗凝失败后LAAC的结果。混合策略与其他药物治疗方案(非混合)在血栓栓塞事件、器械相关血栓(DRT)和大出血方面进行了比较。结果:在5个中心的1625例LAAC手术中,141例患者(8.7%)有抗凝失败史。混合策略应用于n=64(45%)患者,从2014年的零患者增加到2024年的80%。与非混合策略组相比,混合策略患者接受了新一代封堵器(98.4% vs 68.8%)。结论:LAAC抗凝失败后的混合策略越来越多地被采用,与标准非混合策略相比,混合策略与更大的血栓栓塞风险降低相关,且不影响出血情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Polish Archives of Internal Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed periodical issued monthly in English as an official journal of the Polish Society of Internal Medicine. The journal is designed to publish articles related to all aspects of internal medicine, both clinical and basic science, provided they have practical implications. Polish Archives of Internal Medicine appears monthly in both print and online versions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书