Reflective practice in hyper acute stroke nursing: integrating patterns of knowing and trauma theory.

IF 2.1 Q2 NURSING
Patrick Vickers
{"title":"Reflective practice in hyper acute stroke nursing: integrating patterns of knowing and trauma theory.","authors":"Patrick Vickers","doi":"10.1177/17449871261452974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reflective practice is essential in nursing, yet its role in hyper acute settings remains underexplored. Stroke presents unique challenges, combining time critical interventions with sudden trauma and disruption to patients' lives.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine how nursing knowledge and theory shape reflective practice in hyper acute stroke care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This paper adopts a conceptual and reflective approach, drawing on Carper and Chinn and Kramer's patterns of knowing, alongside Judith Herman's three-stage trauma theory. These frameworks are critically explored and applied to lived practice within a hyper acute stroke unit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The integration of multiple patterns of knowing demonstrates how nurses balance empirical urgency with ethical sensitivity, emotional awareness and person-centred care. Herman's theory offers additional insight into safety, identity disruption and recovery following a stroke, highlighting the psychological dimensions of care often constrained by time and environment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Theoretical knowledge and diverse ways of knowing are essential to safe, ethical and holistic stroke nursing. Reflective practice is shown to be an active, present process that informs judgement, relationships and care delivery within complex clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":47172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"17449871261452974"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13303253/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17449871261452974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Reflective practice is essential in nursing, yet its role in hyper acute settings remains underexplored. Stroke presents unique challenges, combining time critical interventions with sudden trauma and disruption to patients' lives.

Aim: To examine how nursing knowledge and theory shape reflective practice in hyper acute stroke care.

Methods: This paper adopts a conceptual and reflective approach, drawing on Carper and Chinn and Kramer's patterns of knowing, alongside Judith Herman's three-stage trauma theory. These frameworks are critically explored and applied to lived practice within a hyper acute stroke unit.

Results: The integration of multiple patterns of knowing demonstrates how nurses balance empirical urgency with ethical sensitivity, emotional awareness and person-centred care. Herman's theory offers additional insight into safety, identity disruption and recovery following a stroke, highlighting the psychological dimensions of care often constrained by time and environment.

Conclusion: Theoretical knowledge and diverse ways of knowing are essential to safe, ethical and holistic stroke nursing. Reflective practice is shown to be an active, present process that informs judgement, relationships and care delivery within complex clinical settings.

超急性脑卒中护理的反思性实践:认知模式与创伤理论的整合。
背景:反思性实践在护理中至关重要,但其在超急性环境中的作用仍未得到充分探讨。中风提出了独特的挑战,将时间关键干预措施与突然的创伤和对患者生活的破坏相结合。目的:探讨护理知识和理论如何影响超急性脑卒中护理的反思性实践。方法:本文采用概念性和反思性的方法,借鉴了Carper、Chinn和Kramer的认知模式,以及Judith Herman的三阶段创伤理论。这些框架被批判性地探索和应用到超急性卒中单位的生活实践中。结果:多种认知模式的整合展示了护士如何平衡经验紧迫性与伦理敏感性,情感意识和以人为本的护理。赫尔曼的理论为中风后的安全、身份中断和恢复提供了额外的见解,强调了受时间和环境限制的护理的心理层面。结论:理论知识和多样化的认识方式是安全、伦理和整体脑卒中护理的必要条件。反思性实践被证明是一个积极的、当下的过程,在复杂的临床环境中为判断、关系和护理提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: The Journal of Research in Nursing is a leading peer reviewed journal that blends good research with contemporary debates about policy and practice. The Journal of Research in Nursing contributes knowledge to nursing practice, research and local, national and international health and social care policy. Each issue contains a variety of papers and review commentaries within a specific theme. The editors are advised and supported by a board of key academics, practitioners and policy makers of international standing. The Journal of Research in Nursing will: • Ensure an evidence base to your practice and policy development • Inform your research work at an advanced level • Challenge you to critically reflect on the interface between practice, policy and research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书