Effects of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy on Quality of Life and Mental Health Among Women With Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.9 Q2 NURSING
SAGE Open Nursing Pub Date : 2026-06-24 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23779608261457726
Huyen Thi Hoa Nguyen, Hien Thi Bui, My Huyen Hac, Tran Ngoc Tran, Anh Chau Nguyen, Thanh Chau Nguyen, Quyen Thu Do, Quyen Ngoc Bao Nguyen, Anh Quynh Dang
{"title":"Effects of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy on Quality of Life and Mental Health Among Women With Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Huyen Thi Hoa Nguyen, Hien Thi Bui, My Huyen Hac, Tran Ngoc Tran, Anh Chau Nguyen, Thanh Chau Nguyen, Quyen Thu Do, Quyen Ngoc Bao Nguyen, Anh Quynh Dang","doi":"10.1177/23779608261457726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT), which integrates cognitive therapy principles with mindfulness practices, may address both psychological distress and quality of life (QoL) among women with cancer. However, its specific benefits in this population remain insufficiently synthesized.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the short-term (post-intervention) and longer-term (≥3 months follow-up) effects of MBCT on quality of life and mental health outcomes in women with cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL was conducted from inception to March 2026. Eligible studies included adult women with cancer receiving MBCT and reporting quantitative outcomes on quality of life or mental health. Risk of bias was assessed using standard tools. Where appropriate, random-effects meta-analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies (n = 766) were included, of which nine contributed to meta-analysis. Participants had a mean age of 49.46 years, with breast cancer being the most common diagnosis (n = 10 studies). MBCT demonstrated improvements in QoL and selected mental health outcomes at both post-intervention and follow-up (all p < 0.05). Improvements were most consistent for fatigue, fear of cancer recurrence, and mindfulness. However, the certainty of evidence ranged from low to very low, primarily due to small sample sizes, heterogeneity, and risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MBCT shows preliminary promise in improving QoL and psychological outcomes among women with cancer and may be feasibly integrated into survivorship care. However, findings should be interpreted with substantial caution given the limited certainty of evidence. Larger, methodologically rigorous trials are needed to confirm these exploratory effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":43312,"journal":{"name":"SAGE Open Nursing","volume":"12 ","pages":"23779608261457726"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13305590/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAGE Open Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608261457726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT), which integrates cognitive therapy principles with mindfulness practices, may address both psychological distress and quality of life (QoL) among women with cancer. However, its specific benefits in this population remain insufficiently synthesized.

Objective: To evaluate the short-term (post-intervention) and longer-term (≥3 months follow-up) effects of MBCT on quality of life and mental health outcomes in women with cancer.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL was conducted from inception to March 2026. Eligible studies included adult women with cancer receiving MBCT and reporting quantitative outcomes on quality of life or mental health. Risk of bias was assessed using standard tools. Where appropriate, random-effects meta-analyses were performed.

Results: Thirteen studies (n = 766) were included, of which nine contributed to meta-analysis. Participants had a mean age of 49.46 years, with breast cancer being the most common diagnosis (n = 10 studies). MBCT demonstrated improvements in QoL and selected mental health outcomes at both post-intervention and follow-up (all p < 0.05). Improvements were most consistent for fatigue, fear of cancer recurrence, and mindfulness. However, the certainty of evidence ranged from low to very low, primarily due to small sample sizes, heterogeneity, and risk of bias.

Conclusions: MBCT shows preliminary promise in improving QoL and psychological outcomes among women with cancer and may be feasibly integrated into survivorship care. However, findings should be interpreted with substantial caution given the limited certainty of evidence. Larger, methodologically rigorous trials are needed to confirm these exploratory effects.

正念认知疗法对女性癌症患者生活质量和心理健康的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:正念认知疗法(MBCT)将认知治疗原理与正念练习相结合,可以解决女性癌症患者的心理困扰和生活质量(QoL)。然而,它对这一人群的具体益处仍未充分综合。目的:评价MBCT对女性癌症患者生活质量和心理健康结局的短期(干预后)和长期(随访≥3个月)影响。方法:系统检索PubMed、CINAHL、Web of Science、Scopus和Cochrane CENTRAL自成立至2026年3月。符合条件的研究包括接受MBCT的成年癌症妇女,并报告生活质量或心理健康的定量结果。使用标准工具评估偏倚风险。适当时,进行随机效应荟萃分析。结果:纳入13项研究(n = 766),其中9项对meta分析有贡献。参与者的平均年龄为49.46岁,乳腺癌是最常见的诊断(n = 10项研究)。MBCT在干预后和随访中均显示了生活质量和选择的心理健康结果的改善(均p < 0.05)。改善最一致的是疲劳、对癌症复发的恐惧和专注力。然而,证据的确定性从低到非常低,主要是由于样本量小、异质性和偏倚风险。结论:MBCT在改善女性癌症患者的生活质量和心理结果方面显示出初步的希望,并可能被纳入生存期护理。然而,鉴于证据的有限确定性,对研究结果的解释应相当谨慎。要证实这些探索性效果,还需要更大规模、更严谨的试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书