Photogrammetric Comparison of Septal Extension Grafts and Columellar Strut Grafts Reinforced with Septocolumellar Sutures.

IF 0.7 Q4 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Süheyla Kandemir, Lütfiye Nisa Caner, Nuray Bayar Muluk, Burak Mustafa Taş, Ziya Şencan, Ela Cömert
{"title":"Photogrammetric Comparison of Septal Extension Grafts and Columellar Strut Grafts Reinforced with Septocolumellar Sutures.","authors":"Süheyla Kandemir, Lütfiye Nisa Caner, Nuray Bayar Muluk, Burak Mustafa Taş, Ziya Şencan, Ela Cömert","doi":"10.4274/tao.2026.2026-1-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effects of septal extension (SE) grafts and columellar strut (CS) grafts reinforced with septocolumellar sutures on nasal tip projection, rotation, and patient-reported outcomes in primary rhinoplasty using standardized photogrammetric analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 60 patients who underwent primary rhinoplasty between 2019 and 2024 (30 SE and 30 CS grafts reinforced with septocolumellar sutures). Nasal tip projection, rotation, and anthropometric parameters were assessed using Rhinobase software. Functional and esthetic outcomes were evaluated using the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation Questionnaire (NOSE) and Facial Aesthetic Quality of Life Questionnaire (FACE-Q).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 27.8 years, and 70% of the participants were female. The mean postoperative follow-up was 9.5±2.7 months. Although baseline nasal length and tip projection were lower in the SE group, both techniques produced comparable postoperative improvements in nasal tip projection, rotation, and nasal length. Postoperative FACE-Q and NOSE scores were also similar between groups, despite lower preoperative FACE-Q scores in the SE group (p=0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CS grafts reinforced with septocolumellar sutures achieved functional and esthetic outcomes comparable to SE grafts. These findings suggest that septocolumellar suturing may compensate for the structural advantages traditionally attributed to SE grafts in primary rhinoplasty.</p>","PeriodicalId":44240,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","volume":" ","pages":"84-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13315653/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/tao.2026.2026-1-18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effects of septal extension (SE) grafts and columellar strut (CS) grafts reinforced with septocolumellar sutures on nasal tip projection, rotation, and patient-reported outcomes in primary rhinoplasty using standardized photogrammetric analysis.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 60 patients who underwent primary rhinoplasty between 2019 and 2024 (30 SE and 30 CS grafts reinforced with septocolumellar sutures). Nasal tip projection, rotation, and anthropometric parameters were assessed using Rhinobase software. Functional and esthetic outcomes were evaluated using the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation Questionnaire (NOSE) and Facial Aesthetic Quality of Life Questionnaire (FACE-Q).

Results: The mean age was 27.8 years, and 70% of the participants were female. The mean postoperative follow-up was 9.5±2.7 months. Although baseline nasal length and tip projection were lower in the SE group, both techniques produced comparable postoperative improvements in nasal tip projection, rotation, and nasal length. Postoperative FACE-Q and NOSE scores were also similar between groups, despite lower preoperative FACE-Q scores in the SE group (p=0.003).

Conclusion: CS grafts reinforced with septocolumellar sutures achieved functional and esthetic outcomes comparable to SE grafts. These findings suggest that septocolumellar suturing may compensate for the structural advantages traditionally attributed to SE grafts in primary rhinoplasty.

鼻中隔延伸性移植物与小柱支撑式移植物经鼻中隔小柱缝合线加固的摄影测量比较。
目的:通过标准化摄影测量分析,比较鼻中隔延伸(SE)移植物和鼻中隔小柱支撑(CS)移植物对鼻尖突出、旋转和初次鼻整形患者报告的结果的影响。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入了60例在2019年至2024年期间接受了初次鼻整形手术的患者(30例SE和30例CS移植物经中隔小柱缝合加固)。使用Rhinobase软件评估鼻尖投影、旋转和人体测量参数。使用鼻塞症状评估问卷(NOSE)和面部美学生活质量问卷(FACE-Q)对功能和美学结果进行评估。结果:平均年龄27.8岁,女性占70%。术后平均随访9.5±2.7个月。虽然SE组的基线鼻长和鼻尖突出较低,但两种技术在鼻尖突出、旋转和鼻长方面均有相当的术后改善。术后FACE-Q和NOSE评分在两组之间也相似,尽管SE组术前FACE-Q评分较低(p=0.003)。结论:经中隔小柱缝合线加固的CS移植物具有与SE移植物相当的功能和美观效果。这些发现表明,鼻中隔小柱缝合可以弥补传统上认为鼻中隔小柱移植在初次鼻整形中的结构优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书