PROTOCOL: Interventions Targeting Misinformation, Disinformation and Malinformation for Reducing and Countering Violent Extremism: A Systematic Review.

IF 3.8 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Campbell Systematic Reviews Pub Date : 2026-06-21 eCollection Date: 2026-06-01 DOI:10.1177/18911803261459099
Cátia Moreira de Carvalho, João Pedro Ramos, Catarina Simas, Pedro Barbosa, Sarah Carthy, Marta Pinto
{"title":"PROTOCOL: Interventions Targeting Misinformation, Disinformation and Malinformation for Reducing and Countering Violent Extremism: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Cátia Moreira de Carvalho, João Pedro Ramos, Catarina Simas, Pedro Barbosa, Sarah Carthy, Marta Pinto","doi":"10.1177/18911803261459099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The dissemination of false or inaccurate information, and its subsequent effect on behaviour, is not a new phenomenon. However, in recent years, alongside the emergence of multiple methods of information transmission, the speed, scale and volume of mis-, dis-, and malinformation (MDM) has reached a new threshold, contributing to societal polarisation and mistrust towards authorities. It has been postulated that the phenomenon may also play a role in the psychosocial process of <i>radicalisation</i>. By re-framing grievances or events and creating shared identities or networks amongst 'believers', exposure to MDM may interact with other audience vulnerabilities to facilitate radicalisation towards violent extremist narratives and networks. This systematic review will examine interventions designed to counter or reduce the effects of exposure to false information and their impact on violent extremism. The review will synthesise evidence across diverse methodologies and settings, identify gaps in the literature, and highlight best practices for reducing or countering the effects of false narratives and their subsequent influence on violent extremist behaviour and attitudes. The findings will inform policymakers, educators, and practitioners about actionable measures to combat the harmful consequences of false information in the context of violent extremism.</p>","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"22 2","pages":"18911803261459099"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13305521/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18911803261459099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The dissemination of false or inaccurate information, and its subsequent effect on behaviour, is not a new phenomenon. However, in recent years, alongside the emergence of multiple methods of information transmission, the speed, scale and volume of mis-, dis-, and malinformation (MDM) has reached a new threshold, contributing to societal polarisation and mistrust towards authorities. It has been postulated that the phenomenon may also play a role in the psychosocial process of radicalisation. By re-framing grievances or events and creating shared identities or networks amongst 'believers', exposure to MDM may interact with other audience vulnerabilities to facilitate radicalisation towards violent extremist narratives and networks. This systematic review will examine interventions designed to counter or reduce the effects of exposure to false information and their impact on violent extremism. The review will synthesise evidence across diverse methodologies and settings, identify gaps in the literature, and highlight best practices for reducing or countering the effects of false narratives and their subsequent influence on violent extremist behaviour and attitudes. The findings will inform policymakers, educators, and practitioners about actionable measures to combat the harmful consequences of false information in the context of violent extremism.

议定书:针对减少和打击暴力极端主义的错误信息、虚假信息和错误信息的干预措施:系统回顾。
虚假或不准确信息的传播及其对行为的后续影响并不是一个新现象。然而,近年来,随着多种信息传播方式的出现,误传、误传和误传(MDM)的速度、规模和数量都达到了一个新的门槛,导致了社会两极分化和对当局的不信任。据推测,这种现象也可能在激进化的心理社会过程中发挥作用。通过重新定义不满或事件,并在“信徒”之间创建共享的身份或网络,MDM可能会与其他受众的脆弱性相互作用,从而促进暴力极端主义叙事和网络的激进化。这项系统审查将审查旨在抵消或减少接触虚假信息的影响及其对暴力极端主义的影响的干预措施。该审查将综合不同方法和背景下的证据,确定文献中的空白,并强调减少或抵制虚假叙述的影响及其对暴力极端主义行为和态度的后续影响的最佳做法。调查结果将为政策制定者、教育工作者和从业人员提供可采取的措施,以打击暴力极端主义背景下虚假信息的有害后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Campbell Systematic Reviews
Campbell Systematic Reviews Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
21.90%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书