Feedlot profitability through the integration of simulated rations and stochastic market dynamics.

IF 1.9 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Translational Animal Science Pub Date : 2026-06-19 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1093/tas/txag061
Elliott Dennis, Shara Akat, James C MacDonald, Russell Knight
{"title":"Feedlot profitability through the integration of simulated rations and stochastic market dynamics.","authors":"Elliott Dennis, Shara Akat, James C MacDonald, Russell Knight","doi":"10.1093/tas/txag061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurately measuring feedlot profitability is critical for management and policy decisions, yet existing benchmarks often rely on limited closeout data and simplified feeding assumptions. We develop a High Plains feedlot simulator that integrates least-cost ration formulation with cattle performance and market dynamics using 2016 Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle manual. We use monthly feed, feeder cattle, and fed cattle prices from 2000 to 2024. Simulated performance aligns with industry benchmarks, with average daily gain of 3.72 lb/day compared with 3.59 and 3.67 lb/day reported by Kansas State and Iowa State, and estimated days on feed averaging 184 days versus 170 and 152 days. Cost-of-gain estimates closely track observed series, with correlation coefficients of 0.83 and 0.91 relative to Iowa and Kansas data, root mean square prediction errors of $12.87/cwt and $8.56/cwt, and mean biases of $0.71/cwt and -$0.03/cwt. Net margins average approximately -$5.62/cwt of finishing weight under a cash-to-cash framework without risk management. Ration composition is dominated by steam-flaked sorghum (≈36.4% of dry matter), steam-flaked corn (≈28.49%), and distillers grains with solubles (≈19.80%), with corn silage as the primary roughage. Sensitivity analysis shows profitability is most responsive to feeder cattle prices, with mean net margins shifting from -$14.58 to $3.33/cwt under ± 10% price changes, while corn price effects are more moderate and distillers grains and transportation costs have smaller impacts. Animal performance metrics remain stable across price scenarios. Ingredient substitution occurs primarily between corn and sorghum, with corn inclusion declining by 4.15% for each 1% increase in corn prices and sorghum increasing by 3.79%. Overall, the framework provides a transparent and regionally adaptable tool for profitability benchmarking and feedlot decision support in High Plains cattle feeding systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":23272,"journal":{"name":"Translational Animal Science","volume":"10 ","pages":"txag061"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13308699/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txag061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurately measuring feedlot profitability is critical for management and policy decisions, yet existing benchmarks often rely on limited closeout data and simplified feeding assumptions. We develop a High Plains feedlot simulator that integrates least-cost ration formulation with cattle performance and market dynamics using 2016 Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle manual. We use monthly feed, feeder cattle, and fed cattle prices from 2000 to 2024. Simulated performance aligns with industry benchmarks, with average daily gain of 3.72 lb/day compared with 3.59 and 3.67 lb/day reported by Kansas State and Iowa State, and estimated days on feed averaging 184 days versus 170 and 152 days. Cost-of-gain estimates closely track observed series, with correlation coefficients of 0.83 and 0.91 relative to Iowa and Kansas data, root mean square prediction errors of $12.87/cwt and $8.56/cwt, and mean biases of $0.71/cwt and -$0.03/cwt. Net margins average approximately -$5.62/cwt of finishing weight under a cash-to-cash framework without risk management. Ration composition is dominated by steam-flaked sorghum (≈36.4% of dry matter), steam-flaked corn (≈28.49%), and distillers grains with solubles (≈19.80%), with corn silage as the primary roughage. Sensitivity analysis shows profitability is most responsive to feeder cattle prices, with mean net margins shifting from -$14.58 to $3.33/cwt under ± 10% price changes, while corn price effects are more moderate and distillers grains and transportation costs have smaller impacts. Animal performance metrics remain stable across price scenarios. Ingredient substitution occurs primarily between corn and sorghum, with corn inclusion declining by 4.15% for each 1% increase in corn prices and sorghum increasing by 3.79%. Overall, the framework provides a transparent and regionally adaptable tool for profitability benchmarking and feedlot decision support in High Plains cattle feeding systems.

通过模拟口粮和随机市场动态相结合的饲养场盈利能力。
准确衡量饲养场的盈利能力对管理和政策决策至关重要,但现有的基准往往依赖于有限的关闭数据和简化的饲养假设。我们根据《2016年肉牛营养需求手册》开发了一个High Plains饲养场模拟器,该模拟器将最低成本的日粮配方与牛的性能和市场动态相结合。我们使用2000年至2024年的月饲料、饲养牛和饲养牛价格。模拟的性能与行业基准一致,平均日增重为3.72磅/天,而堪萨斯州立大学和爱荷华州立大学的报告分别为3.59和3.67磅/天,估计平均饲料天数为184天,而170天和152天。收益成本估算与观测序列密切相关,相对于爱荷华州和堪萨斯州的数据,相关系数分别为0.83和0.91,均方根预测误差分别为12.87美元/cwt和8.56美元/cwt,平均偏差分别为0.71美元/cwt和- 0.03美元/cwt。在没有风险管理的现金转现金框架下,净利润率平均约为- 5.62美元/cwt。日粮组成以蒸高粱片(约36.4%)、蒸玉米片(约28.49%)和酒糟颗粒(约19.80%)为主,以玉米青贮为主要粗饲料。敏感性分析显示,盈利能力对饲养牛价格的反应最为敏感,在±10%的价格变化下,平均净利润率从- 14.58美元/cwt变化到3.33美元/cwt,而玉米价格的影响较为温和,酒糟和运输成本的影响较小。动物生产性能指标在不同价格情景下保持稳定。原料替代主要发生在玉米和高粱之间,玉米价格每上涨1%,玉米纳入率下降4.15%,高粱纳入率上升3.79%。总体而言,该框架为高平原牛饲养系统的盈利能力基准和饲养场决策支持提供了一个透明且具有区域适应性的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Translational Animal Science
Translational Animal Science Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Animal Science (TAS) is the first open access-open review animal science journal, encompassing a broad scope of research topics in animal science. TAS focuses on translating basic science to innovation, and validation of these innovations by various segments of the allied animal industry. Readers of TAS will typically represent education, industry, and government, including research, teaching, administration, extension, management, quality assurance, product development, and technical services. Those interested in TAS typically include animal breeders, economists, embryologists, engineers, food scientists, geneticists, microbiologists, nutritionists, veterinarians, physiologists, processors, public health professionals, and others with an interest in animal production and applied aspects of animal sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书