Ingrid Garzón, Miguel Ángel Martín-Piedra, Luis Martínez-Girón, Miguel Alaminos, James J Yoo, Anthony Atala
{"title":"Isolation and characterization of human multilineage-differentiating stress-enduring cells for use in tissue engineering: a systematic review.","authors":"Ingrid Garzón, Miguel Ángel Martín-Piedra, Luis Martínez-Girón, Miguel Alaminos, James J Yoo, Anthony Atala","doi":"10.1093/stcltm/szag039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Human multilineage-differentiating stress-enduring (MUSE) cells represent a promising cell population for tissue engineering and translational medicine owing to their intrinsic pluripotency and stress resistance. MUSE cells express pluripotency markers such as SSEA-3, Nanog, Sox2, and Oct3/4, while maintaining their immunomodulatory capabilities. This systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42024532621) analyzed studies on human MUSE cell isolation, characterization, and translational potential through searches of the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases in April 2024. The TIDieR and SYRCLE checklists were used to assess the risk of bias. Our findings identified 34 studies that followed the PRISMA guidelines for assessing different tissue sources, isolation techniques, and characterization methods. MUSE cells are primarily obtained from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, and fluorescence-activated cell sorting is the predominant isolation method. Characterization was mainly performed using SSEA-3 immunodetection (positivity ranged from <1% to 6.30%) and was linked to the expression of pluripotency and mesenchymal markers. These findings highlight the relevance of MUSE cells in regenerative medicine as a distinct pluripotent subpopulation within adult mesenchymal tissues. In addition, SSEA-3-based isolation approaches complemented by functional assays has emerged as a key methodological approach for the reliable identification and characterization of MUSE cells. However, isolation efficiency varies depending on the cell source and method. Standardized protocols are, therefore, needed to improve reproducibility and facilitate the translational development of MUSE cell-based regenerative therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":21986,"journal":{"name":"Stem Cells Translational Medicine","volume":"15 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13311668/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stem Cells Translational Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/stcltm/szag039","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Human multilineage-differentiating stress-enduring (MUSE) cells represent a promising cell population for tissue engineering and translational medicine owing to their intrinsic pluripotency and stress resistance. MUSE cells express pluripotency markers such as SSEA-3, Nanog, Sox2, and Oct3/4, while maintaining their immunomodulatory capabilities. This systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42024532621) analyzed studies on human MUSE cell isolation, characterization, and translational potential through searches of the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases in April 2024. The TIDieR and SYRCLE checklists were used to assess the risk of bias. Our findings identified 34 studies that followed the PRISMA guidelines for assessing different tissue sources, isolation techniques, and characterization methods. MUSE cells are primarily obtained from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, and fluorescence-activated cell sorting is the predominant isolation method. Characterization was mainly performed using SSEA-3 immunodetection (positivity ranged from <1% to 6.30%) and was linked to the expression of pluripotency and mesenchymal markers. These findings highlight the relevance of MUSE cells in regenerative medicine as a distinct pluripotent subpopulation within adult mesenchymal tissues. In addition, SSEA-3-based isolation approaches complemented by functional assays has emerged as a key methodological approach for the reliable identification and characterization of MUSE cells. However, isolation efficiency varies depending on the cell source and method. Standardized protocols are, therefore, needed to improve reproducibility and facilitate the translational development of MUSE cell-based regenerative therapies.
人类多系分化耐压细胞(MUSE)由于其固有的多能性和抗逆性,在组织工程和转化医学中具有广阔的应用前景。MUSE细胞表达多能性标记物,如SSEA-3、Nanog、Sox2和Oct3/4,同时保持其免疫调节能力。该系统综述(PROSPERO CRD42024532621)于2024年4月通过检索PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science数据库,分析了关于人类MUSE细胞分离、表征和转化潜力的研究。使用TIDieR和sycle检查表来评估偏倚风险。我们的研究结果确定了34项遵循PRISMA指南评估不同组织来源、分离技术和表征方法的研究。MUSE细胞主要来自骨髓间充质干细胞,荧光激活细胞分选是主要的分离方法。表征主要采用SSEA-3免疫检测(阳性范围从
期刊介绍:
STEM CELLS Translational Medicine is a monthly, peer-reviewed, largely online, open access journal.
STEM CELLS Translational Medicine works to advance the utilization of cells for clinical therapy. By bridging stem cell molecular and biological research and helping speed translations of emerging lab discoveries into clinical trials, STEM CELLS Translational Medicine will help move applications of these critical investigations closer to accepted best patient practices and ultimately improve outcomes.
The journal encourages original research articles and concise reviews describing laboratory investigations of stem cells, including their characterization and manipulation, and the translation of their clinical aspects of from the bench to patient care. STEM CELLS Translational Medicine covers all aspects of translational cell studies, including bench research, first-in-human case studies, and relevant clinical trials.