B-mode ultrasound and dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) of the bowel wall in patients with gastrointestinal food allergy in comparison to Crohn's disease and healthy controls.

IF 3.1 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Ultrasound International Open Pub Date : 2025-12-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2735-9906
Dane Wildner, Martin Raithel, Maximilian J Waldner, Alexander F Hagel, Markus F Neurath, Lukas Pfeifer
{"title":"B-mode ultrasound and dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) of the bowel wall in patients with gastrointestinal food allergy in comparison to Crohn's disease and healthy controls.","authors":"Dane Wildner, Martin Raithel, Maximilian J Waldner, Alexander F Hagel, Markus F Neurath, Lukas Pfeifer","doi":"10.1055/a-2735-9906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess bowel wall thickness using B-mode ultrasound (US) and perfusion measurement by DCE-US in patients with a food allergy (FA) compared to healthy controls (HCs) and patients with active Crohn's disease (CD).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Bowel wall thickness and perfusion were assessed in FA patients as well as in HCs on a potato rice diet (PRD) and after a provocation diet (PD). Additionally, patients with active CD were examined for further comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 48 individuals (20 with FAs, 20 with CD, and 8 HCs) were included. There was no significant difference between the HCs and patients with FAs regarding the thickness of the terminal ileum (1.8mm vs. 2.2mm; p=0.46) and the sigmoid colon (2.1mm vs. 2.1mm; p=1) on a PRD. After a PD, the median value was significantly lower in the terminal ileum for HCs compared to patients with FAs (1.6 mm vs. 2.3 mm; p=0.03). In CD patients, the thickness of the terminal ileum was far more pronounced (median thickness 6 mm) compared to HCs and patients with FAs (p<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference for all tested DCE-US parameters in the terminal ileum between the HCs and patients with FAs on either PRD or PD. However, DCE-US perfusion parameters (PE, WiAUC, WiR, WiPi, and WoR) were significantly higher in patients with CD compared to HCs and patients with FAs on a PD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Assessment of wall thickening of the terminal ileum using US and perfusion measurements via DCE-US appears to be insufficient for distinguishing between HCs and patients with FAs. However, US and DCE-US could be helpful in differentiating patients with CD from those with FAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":44852,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound International Open","volume":"11 ","pages":"a27359906"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13299687/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2735-9906","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess bowel wall thickness using B-mode ultrasound (US) and perfusion measurement by DCE-US in patients with a food allergy (FA) compared to healthy controls (HCs) and patients with active Crohn's disease (CD).

Materials and methods: Bowel wall thickness and perfusion were assessed in FA patients as well as in HCs on a potato rice diet (PRD) and after a provocation diet (PD). Additionally, patients with active CD were examined for further comparison.

Results: A total of 48 individuals (20 with FAs, 20 with CD, and 8 HCs) were included. There was no significant difference between the HCs and patients with FAs regarding the thickness of the terminal ileum (1.8mm vs. 2.2mm; p=0.46) and the sigmoid colon (2.1mm vs. 2.1mm; p=1) on a PRD. After a PD, the median value was significantly lower in the terminal ileum for HCs compared to patients with FAs (1.6 mm vs. 2.3 mm; p=0.03). In CD patients, the thickness of the terminal ileum was far more pronounced (median thickness 6 mm) compared to HCs and patients with FAs (p<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference for all tested DCE-US parameters in the terminal ileum between the HCs and patients with FAs on either PRD or PD. However, DCE-US perfusion parameters (PE, WiAUC, WiR, WiPi, and WoR) were significantly higher in patients with CD compared to HCs and patients with FAs on a PD.

Conclusion: Assessment of wall thickening of the terminal ileum using US and perfusion measurements via DCE-US appears to be insufficient for distinguishing between HCs and patients with FAs. However, US and DCE-US could be helpful in differentiating patients with CD from those with FAs.

胃肠道食物过敏患者肠壁的b超和动态对比增强超声(DCE-US)与克罗恩病和健康对照的比较
目的:本研究的目的是用b超(US)和DCE-US测量食物过敏(FA)患者的肠壁厚度,并将其与健康对照(hc)和活动性克罗恩病(CD)患者进行比较。材料和方法:评估FA患者以及马铃薯米饮食(PRD)和激发饮食(PD)后的hc患者的肠壁厚度和灌注。此外,对活动性乳糜泻患者进行检查以进行进一步比较。结果:共纳入48例(FAs 20例,CD 20例,hc 8例)。肝纤维化患者与FAs患者在PRD上的回肠末端厚度(1.8mm vs 2.2mm, p=0.46)和乙状结肠厚度(2.1mm vs 2.1mm, p=1)无显著差异。PD后,hcc患者回肠末端的中位值明显低于FAs患者(1.6 mm vs 2.3 mm; p=0.03)。在CD患者中,回肠末端的厚度比hcc患者和FAs患者要明显得多(中位厚度为6mm)。结论:使用超声和DCE-US灌注测量评估回肠末端的壁增厚似乎不足以区分hcc和FAs患者。然而,US和DCE-US可能有助于区分CD患者和FAs患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ultrasound International Open
Ultrasound International Open RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书