Effect of needle disinfection with different antiseptic agents on infectious complications after TRUS-guided prostate biopsy: a prospective randomized study.
Mustafa Serdar Çağlayan, Mustafa Kestel, Musa Ekici, Cemil Aydin, Muhammet İhsan Öztürk, Ahmet Taşcı, Mehmet Murat Baykam
{"title":"Effect of needle disinfection with different antiseptic agents on infectious complications after TRUS-guided prostate biopsy: a prospective randomized study.","authors":"Mustafa Serdar Çağlayan, Mustafa Kestel, Musa Ekici, Cemil Aydin, Muhammet İhsan Öztürk, Ahmet Taşcı, Mehmet Murat Baykam","doi":"10.1177/17562872261458100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-guided biopsy) remains widely used for the diagnosis of prostate cancer, but it is associated with a risk of infectious complications despite antibiotic prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effect of disinfecting the prostate biopsy needle with different antiseptic agents after each core sampling on post-procedural infectious complications.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective, randomized, single-center clinical study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between February and May 2025, 240 patients undergoing TRUS-guided prostate biopsy were randomly assigned to four groups (<i>n</i> = 60 each): no needle disinfection, povidone-iodine disinfection, 10% formalin disinfection, or 70% isopropyl alcohol disinfection after each biopsy core. All patients received standardized empirical antibiotic prophylaxis based on the institutional protocol and local antibiogram data. Prophylaxis consisted of oral cefixime initiated on the day of biopsy and continued for 5-7 days. Patients were actively followed for 30 days for febrile urinary tract infection, hospitalization, sepsis, and microbiological culture results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rate of febrile urinary tract infection was highest in the non-disinfection group (11.6%). No cases of fever, hospitalization, or sepsis were observed in the formalin group. Povidone-iodine and isopropyl alcohol disinfection were associated with lower infection rates than no disinfection, but were less effective than formalin. <i>Escherichia coli</i> was the most frequently isolated microorganism in positive cultures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Disinfection of the biopsy needle after each core sampling is associated with a meaningful reduction in infectious complications following TRUS-guided prostate biopsy. Among the evaluated agents, 10% formalin demonstrated the greatest protective effect; however, further multicenter studies with longer follow-up are required to confirm long-term safety and generalizability.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT06836271; Local trial ID: HititUrology001).</p>","PeriodicalId":23010,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Urology","volume":"18 ","pages":"17562872261458100"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13305399/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562872261458100","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-guided biopsy) remains widely used for the diagnosis of prostate cancer, but it is associated with a risk of infectious complications despite antibiotic prophylaxis.
Objectives: To evaluate the effect of disinfecting the prostate biopsy needle with different antiseptic agents after each core sampling on post-procedural infectious complications.
Design: A prospective, randomized, single-center clinical study.
Methods: Between February and May 2025, 240 patients undergoing TRUS-guided prostate biopsy were randomly assigned to four groups (n = 60 each): no needle disinfection, povidone-iodine disinfection, 10% formalin disinfection, or 70% isopropyl alcohol disinfection after each biopsy core. All patients received standardized empirical antibiotic prophylaxis based on the institutional protocol and local antibiogram data. Prophylaxis consisted of oral cefixime initiated on the day of biopsy and continued for 5-7 days. Patients were actively followed for 30 days for febrile urinary tract infection, hospitalization, sepsis, and microbiological culture results.
Results: The rate of febrile urinary tract infection was highest in the non-disinfection group (11.6%). No cases of fever, hospitalization, or sepsis were observed in the formalin group. Povidone-iodine and isopropyl alcohol disinfection were associated with lower infection rates than no disinfection, but were less effective than formalin. Escherichia coli was the most frequently isolated microorganism in positive cultures.
Conclusion: Disinfection of the biopsy needle after each core sampling is associated with a meaningful reduction in infectious complications following TRUS-guided prostate biopsy. Among the evaluated agents, 10% formalin demonstrated the greatest protective effect; however, further multicenter studies with longer follow-up are required to confirm long-term safety and generalizability.
Trial registration: This trial was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT06836271; Local trial ID: HititUrology001).
期刊介绍:
Therapeutic Advances in Urology delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of urology.
The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in urology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. The editors welcome articles of current interest across all areas of urology, including treatment of urological disorders, with a focus on emerging pharmacological therapies.