Assessing the diagnostic utility of baseline creatine kinase levels in patients with suspected idiopathic inflammatory myopathies and neuromuscular disorders.

IF 2.8 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Rheumatology Advances in Practice Pub Date : 2026-06-24 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1093/rap/rkag061
Nikola Wilk, Filipe O Pinheiro, Linn Renken, Natalia Molina-Esteban, Chanakya Kodishala, Catherine Ivory, Nancy Maltez, Latika Gupta, James B Lilleker, Hector Chinoy
{"title":"Assessing the diagnostic utility of baseline creatine kinase levels in patients with suspected idiopathic inflammatory myopathies and neuromuscular disorders.","authors":"Nikola Wilk, Filipe O Pinheiro, Linn Renken, Natalia Molina-Esteban, Chanakya Kodishala, Catherine Ivory, Nancy Maltez, Latika Gupta, James B Lilleker, Hector Chinoy","doi":"10.1093/rap/rkag061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Serum creatine kinase (CK) is widely used in the diagnostic evaluation of neuromuscular disorders, including idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). As most laboratories define reference ranges using the central 95% of values from white populations, elevated CK levels are common in otherwise healthy individuals. We investigated the predictive value of baseline CK at defined cutoffs for diagnosing an underlying myopathic illness including IIM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was performed of consecutive adult patients attending a tertiary neuromuscular clinic from January 2018 to June 2022. We investigated the test characteristics of CK based on several a priori defined thresholds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From a total of 488 patients, we identified 276 IIM cases, 89 with a non-inflammatory myopathy and 123 had an alternative/reassuring aetiology. Baseline CK levels were significantly higher in the IIM and non-inflammatory myopathy groups vs the alternative/reassuring group. The laboratory defined cutoffs for CK yielded a sensitivity of 77.0%, a specificity of 66.7% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 87.3% for identifying IIM or other neuromuscular disorders, which only marginally improved when evaluating the 97.5th percentile (75.6, 67.5 and 87.3%) or the European Federation of Neurological Societies (EFNS) thresholds (68.8, 78.0 and 90.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current thresholds defined by the EFNS guidelines compared with laboratory defined cutoff to pursue investigations for elevated CK only marginally improve specificity. A baseline CK >1000 IU/l is highly predictive of an IIM or other neuromuscular disorders. This study highlights the role of baseline CK levels in suspected IIM and neuromuscular disorders, clarifying its diagnostic value.</p>","PeriodicalId":21350,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology Advances in Practice","volume":"10 3","pages":"rkag061"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13308716/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology Advances in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rap/rkag061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Serum creatine kinase (CK) is widely used in the diagnostic evaluation of neuromuscular disorders, including idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). As most laboratories define reference ranges using the central 95% of values from white populations, elevated CK levels are common in otherwise healthy individuals. We investigated the predictive value of baseline CK at defined cutoffs for diagnosing an underlying myopathic illness including IIM.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of consecutive adult patients attending a tertiary neuromuscular clinic from January 2018 to June 2022. We investigated the test characteristics of CK based on several a priori defined thresholds.

Results: From a total of 488 patients, we identified 276 IIM cases, 89 with a non-inflammatory myopathy and 123 had an alternative/reassuring aetiology. Baseline CK levels were significantly higher in the IIM and non-inflammatory myopathy groups vs the alternative/reassuring group. The laboratory defined cutoffs for CK yielded a sensitivity of 77.0%, a specificity of 66.7% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 87.3% for identifying IIM or other neuromuscular disorders, which only marginally improved when evaluating the 97.5th percentile (75.6, 67.5 and 87.3%) or the European Federation of Neurological Societies (EFNS) thresholds (68.8, 78.0 and 90.3%).

Conclusion: The current thresholds defined by the EFNS guidelines compared with laboratory defined cutoff to pursue investigations for elevated CK only marginally improve specificity. A baseline CK >1000 IU/l is highly predictive of an IIM or other neuromuscular disorders. This study highlights the role of baseline CK levels in suspected IIM and neuromuscular disorders, clarifying its diagnostic value.

评估基线肌酸激酶水平在疑似特发性炎性肌病和神经肌肉疾病患者中的诊断效用。
目的:血清肌酸激酶(CK)被广泛用于神经肌肉疾病的诊断评估,包括特发性炎症性肌病(IIM)。由于大多数实验室使用白人人群中95%的值来定义参考范围,CK水平升高在其他健康个体中很常见。我们研究了基线CK在诊断包括IIM在内的潜在肌病的预测价值。方法:对2018年1月至2022年6月在三级神经肌肉诊所连续就诊的成年患者进行回顾性图表回顾。我们根据几个先验定义的阈值研究了CK的试验特征。结果:从总共488例患者中,我们确定了276例IIM病例,89例为非炎症性肌病,123例为替代/可靠病因。IIM组和非炎症性肌病组的基线CK水平明显高于替代/安心组。实验室定义的CK临界值在识别IIM或其他神经肌肉疾病方面的敏感性为77.0%,特异性为66.7%,阳性预测值(PPV)为87.3%,在评估97.5%百分位(75.6、67.5和87.3%)或欧洲神经学会联合会(EFNS)阈值(68.8、78.0和90.3%)时仅略微提高。结论:EFNS指南定义的当前阈值与实验室定义的临界值相比,仅略微提高了CK升高的特异性。基线CK bb0 1000 IU/l是IIM或其他神经肌肉疾病的高度预测指标。本研究强调了基线CK水平在疑似IIM和神经肌肉疾病中的作用,阐明了其诊断价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rheumatology Advances in Practice
Rheumatology Advances in Practice Medicine-Rheumatology
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
197
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书