Factors affecting the survival rate after living donor liver transplantation in the country of Georgia.

IF 2.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
SAGE Open Medicine Pub Date : 2026-06-22 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20503121261463213
Marika Mortuladze, Sophio Beridze, Kakhaber Kashibadze, George Kamkamidze, Lela Shengelia
{"title":"Factors affecting the survival rate after living donor liver transplantation in the country of Georgia.","authors":"Marika Mortuladze, Sophio Beridze, Kakhaber Kashibadze, George Kamkamidze, Lela Shengelia","doi":"10.1177/20503121261463213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to evaluate factors influencing survival after LDLT in Georgia and to identify underlying causes and strategies for improved outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional retrospective study including 103 living donor recipients transplanted <b>between December 2014 and July 2024</b> was conducted. Survival was analyzed from the date of transplantation to death or censoring at the last available follow up. Kaplan Meier methods were used to estimate overall survival at 1, 3 and 5 years. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate factors associated with mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall survival (OS) declined significantly during the first post-transplant year. Kaplan Meier estimated patient survival was 72.8 percent at 1 year, 64.5 percent at 3 years and 63.0 percent at 5 years. The number at risk was 71 at 1 year, 47 at 3 years and 29 at 5 years. Among 103 LDLT recipients, 38 deaths occurred and 65 patients were censored alive during follow up. Median observed follow up was 878 days, IQR 286 to 1989. In the primary Cox proportional hazards model, intra or postoperative complications were associated with higher mortality, adjusted HR 2.67, 95 percent CI 1.38 to 5.16, p = 0.004. HCC was also associated with higher mortality, adjusted HR 3.37, 95 percent CI 1.65 to 6.91, p = <0.001. Schoenfeld residual based tests did not indicate violation of the proportional hazards assumption.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study offers valuable insight into post-transplant LDLT outcomes in Georgia. Identification of key clinical risk factors highlights opportunities for targeted intervention. Given that Georgia's short-term survival rates remain lower than those reported in high-income countries, optimizing modifiable risk factors may improve long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":21398,"journal":{"name":"SAGE Open Medicine","volume":"14 ","pages":"20503121261463213"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13305268/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAGE Open Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121261463213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to evaluate factors influencing survival after LDLT in Georgia and to identify underlying causes and strategies for improved outcomes.

Methods: A cross-sectional retrospective study including 103 living donor recipients transplanted between December 2014 and July 2024 was conducted. Survival was analyzed from the date of transplantation to death or censoring at the last available follow up. Kaplan Meier methods were used to estimate overall survival at 1, 3 and 5 years. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate factors associated with mortality.

Results: Overall survival (OS) declined significantly during the first post-transplant year. Kaplan Meier estimated patient survival was 72.8 percent at 1 year, 64.5 percent at 3 years and 63.0 percent at 5 years. The number at risk was 71 at 1 year, 47 at 3 years and 29 at 5 years. Among 103 LDLT recipients, 38 deaths occurred and 65 patients were censored alive during follow up. Median observed follow up was 878 days, IQR 286 to 1989. In the primary Cox proportional hazards model, intra or postoperative complications were associated with higher mortality, adjusted HR 2.67, 95 percent CI 1.38 to 5.16, p = 0.004. HCC was also associated with higher mortality, adjusted HR 3.37, 95 percent CI 1.65 to 6.91, p = <0.001. Schoenfeld residual based tests did not indicate violation of the proportional hazards assumption.

Conclusion: This study offers valuable insight into post-transplant LDLT outcomes in Georgia. Identification of key clinical risk factors highlights opportunities for targeted intervention. Given that Georgia's short-term survival rates remain lower than those reported in high-income countries, optimizing modifiable risk factors may improve long-term outcomes.

影响格鲁吉亚活体肝移植术后存活率的因素。
目的:我们旨在评估影响格鲁吉亚LDLT术后生存的因素,并确定改善预后的潜在原因和策略。方法:对2014年12月至2024年7月期间移植的103例活体受者进行横断面回顾性研究。从移植之日起至死亡或最后一次随访时进行生存分析。Kaplan Meier方法用于估计1年、3年和5年的总生存率。采用Cox比例风险回归评价与死亡率相关的因素。结果:移植后第一年内总生存率(OS)显著下降。Kaplan Meier估计患者1年生存率为72.8%,3年生存率为64.5%,5年生存率为63.0%。1年后有危险的人数是71人,3年后是47人,5年后是29人。在103例LDLT受者中,随访期间38例死亡,65例存活。中位随访878天,IQR 286 ~ 1989。在主要Cox比例风险模型中,术中或术后并发症与较高的死亡率相关,调整后危险度为2.67,95% CI为1.38 ~ 5.16,p = 0.004。HCC也与较高的死亡率相关,调整后的HR为3.37,95% CI为1.65至6.91,p =结论:本研究为格鲁吉亚移植后LDLT预后提供了有价值的见解。关键临床风险因素的识别突出了有针对性干预的机会。鉴于格鲁吉亚的短期生存率仍然低于高收入国家的报告,优化可改变的风险因素可能会改善长期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SAGE Open Medicine
SAGE Open Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
289
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书