Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on systemic anti-cancer therapy in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.6 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2026-06-25 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20523211.2026.2684148
Dana Karasneh, Mohammed Patel, Syed Shahzad Hasan, Barbara R Conway, Ahmed A Sadeq, Mamoon A Aldeyab
{"title":"Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on systemic anti-cancer therapy in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Dana Karasneh, Mohammed Patel, Syed Shahzad Hasan, Barbara R Conway, Ahmed A Sadeq, Mamoon A Aldeyab","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2026.2684148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic caused significant disruptions in oncology services worldwide. Breast cancer care depends on timely and coordinated treatment pathways. This review assessed changes in systemic anti-cancer therapy, including chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. Secondary outcomes included treatment delays, short-term mortality, and hospital admissions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024542702). We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL for studies published between March 2020 and August 2024. We included original studies comparing adult breast cancer patients treated before and during the pandemic. Patients of any stage and sex were eligible. We assessed risk of bias and used a random-effects model to present pooled proportions and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-eight studies were included in the review, and 35 in the meta-analysis. Chemotherapy use increased from 35% before the pandemic to 42% during the pandemic. This rise was driven by an increase in neoadjuvant chemotherapy, from 18% to 22%, while adjuvant chemotherapy remained stable. Endocrine therapy increased from 35% to 42%. Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy rose from 2% to 10%, whereas adjuvant endocrine therapy declined from 46% to 43%. Targeted therapy and immunotherapy showed minimal change. The pooled OR for short-term mortality was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.56-1.15). Hospital admission estimates showed wide confidence intervals, reflecting heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The pandemic led to notable shifts in systemic treatment patterns, particularly an increase in the use of neoadjuvant strategies. Short-term mortality did not significantly differ between periods. The study findings should be interpreted with caution due to variability in studies. Health systems require robust pharmaceutical policies and resilient triage frameworks to ensure continuity of cancer treatment during future crises.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":"19 1","pages":"2684148"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13307381/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2026.2684148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic caused significant disruptions in oncology services worldwide. Breast cancer care depends on timely and coordinated treatment pathways. This review assessed changes in systemic anti-cancer therapy, including chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. Secondary outcomes included treatment delays, short-term mortality, and hospital admissions.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024542702). We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL for studies published between March 2020 and August 2024. We included original studies comparing adult breast cancer patients treated before and during the pandemic. Patients of any stage and sex were eligible. We assessed risk of bias and used a random-effects model to present pooled proportions and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: Forty-eight studies were included in the review, and 35 in the meta-analysis. Chemotherapy use increased from 35% before the pandemic to 42% during the pandemic. This rise was driven by an increase in neoadjuvant chemotherapy, from 18% to 22%, while adjuvant chemotherapy remained stable. Endocrine therapy increased from 35% to 42%. Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy rose from 2% to 10%, whereas adjuvant endocrine therapy declined from 46% to 43%. Targeted therapy and immunotherapy showed minimal change. The pooled OR for short-term mortality was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.56-1.15). Hospital admission estimates showed wide confidence intervals, reflecting heterogeneity.

Conclusion: The pandemic led to notable shifts in systemic treatment patterns, particularly an increase in the use of neoadjuvant strategies. Short-term mortality did not significantly differ between periods. The study findings should be interpreted with caution due to variability in studies. Health systems require robust pharmaceutical policies and resilient triage frameworks to ensure continuity of cancer treatment during future crises.

COVID-19大流行对乳腺癌患者全身抗癌治疗的影响:系统综述和荟萃分析
背景:2019冠状病毒病大流行对全球肿瘤学服务造成了重大干扰。乳腺癌的护理取决于及时和协调的治疗途径。本综述评估了全身抗癌治疗的变化,包括化疗、内分泌治疗、靶向治疗和免疫治疗。次要结局包括治疗延误、短期死亡率和住院率。方法:我们按照PRISMA指南进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。该协议已在PROSPERO注册(CRD42024542702)。我们检索了PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和CINAHL,检索了2020年3月至2024年8月之间发表的研究。我们纳入了比较大流行之前和期间接受治疗的成年乳腺癌患者的原始研究。任何阶段和性别的患者都符合条件。我们评估了偏倚风险,并使用随机效应模型来呈现95%置信区间(ci)的合并比例和优势比(ORs)。结果:综述纳入48项研究,荟萃分析纳入35项研究。化疗的使用从大流行前的35%增加到大流行期间的42%。这一增长是由于新辅助化疗的增加,从18%增加到22%,而辅助化疗保持稳定。内分泌治疗从35%增加到42%。新辅助内分泌治疗从2%上升到10%,而辅助内分泌治疗从46%下降到43%。靶向治疗和免疫治疗变化最小。短期死亡率的合并OR为0.81 (95% CI: 0.56-1.15)。住院率估计显示广泛的置信区间,反映了异质性。结论:大流行导致了系统性治疗模式的显著转变,特别是新辅助策略的使用增加。不同时期的短期死亡率没有显著差异。由于研究的可变性,研究结果应谨慎解释。卫生系统需要强有力的药品政策和有弹性的分诊框架,以确保在未来危机期间癌症治疗的连续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
81
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书