AHA/ACC/ESC/WHF Expert Consensus Document: Second Universal Definition of Heart Failure (2026).

IF 22.3 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Mary Norine Walsh, Lars Kober, Karen Sliwa, Marianna Adamo, Anubha Agarwal, Amitava Banerjee, Biykem Bozkurt, Maja Cikes, Albertino Damasceno, Akshay S Desai, G Michael Felker, Gail Hogan, Koichiro Kinugawa, Michelle Kittleson, Carolyn S P Lam, Theresa McDonagh, Marco Metra, Wilfried Mullens, Antonio Luiz P Ribeiro, Yolanda Vaughn, Amanda Vest
{"title":"AHA/ACC/ESC/WHF Expert Consensus Document: Second Universal Definition of Heart Failure (2026).","authors":"Mary Norine Walsh, Lars Kober, Karen Sliwa, Marianna Adamo, Anubha Agarwal, Amitava Banerjee, Biykem Bozkurt, Maja Cikes, Albertino Damasceno, Akshay S Desai, G Michael Felker, Gail Hogan, Koichiro Kinugawa, Michelle Kittleson, Carolyn S P Lam, Theresa McDonagh, Marco Metra, Wilfried Mullens, Antonio Luiz P Ribeiro, Yolanda Vaughn, Amanda Vest","doi":"10.1016/j.jacc.2026.05.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Heart failure (HF) remains a pressing health concern, with rising prevalence globally. Subjectivity and ambiguity in the definition of HF and its antecedent stages have limited research, global surveillance, and prevention programs. To address this, several cardiac societies and foundations convened to standardize the definition of HF in 2021 and designated stage B or pre-HF to identify individuals at risk of developing HF. In subsequent years, substantial progress and changes have been made in aspects of preventing HF, improving HF diagnosis and management, and recognizing the importance of the affected individual's voice. Global differences and disparities in HF are better understood, as are causes and comorbidities leading to differences in care, which are also influenced by access to care. This consensus document presents the Second Universal Definition of Heart Failure, aiming to standardize terminology and facilitate a uniform approach for clinicians, researchers, health systems, and policymakers. In this definition, the classification of HF phenotypes moves away from rigid left ventricular ejection fraction cutoffs, instead grouping HF into reduced, preserved, and improved ejection fraction categories to better reflect clinical realities. A universal classification of HF causes is also proposed. The document also addresses the dynamic trajectories of HF-improvement, remission, and recovery-and highlights the impact of social determinants and geographic variation on HF risk and outcomes. By providing a comprehensive, standardized framework for HF definition and classification, this document seeks to improve prevention, early detection, and management of HF worldwide, ultimately enhancing patient care and advancing global cardiovascular health.</p>","PeriodicalId":17187,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"1797-1812"},"PeriodicalIF":22.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13711301/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2026.05.036","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Heart failure (HF) remains a pressing health concern, with rising prevalence globally. Subjectivity and ambiguity in the definition of HF and its antecedent stages have limited research, global surveillance, and prevention programs. To address this, several cardiac societies and foundations convened to standardize the definition of HF in 2021 and designated stage B or pre-HF to identify individuals at risk of developing HF. In subsequent years, substantial progress and changes have been made in aspects of preventing HF, improving HF diagnosis and management, and recognizing the importance of the affected individual's voice. Global differences and disparities in HF are better understood, as are causes and comorbidities leading to differences in care, which are also influenced by access to care. This consensus document presents the Second Universal Definition of Heart Failure, aiming to standardize terminology and facilitate a uniform approach for clinicians, researchers, health systems, and policymakers. In this definition, the classification of HF phenotypes moves away from rigid left ventricular ejection fraction cutoffs, instead grouping HF into reduced, preserved, and improved ejection fraction categories to better reflect clinical realities. A universal classification of HF causes is also proposed. The document also addresses the dynamic trajectories of HF-improvement, remission, and recovery-and highlights the impact of social determinants and geographic variation on HF risk and outcomes. By providing a comprehensive, standardized framework for HF definition and classification, this document seeks to improve prevention, early detection, and management of HF worldwide, ultimately enhancing patient care and advancing global cardiovascular health.

AHA/ACC/ESC/WHF专家共识文件:心力衰竭的第二个通用定义(2026)。
心力衰竭(HF)仍然是一个紧迫的健康问题,全球患病率不断上升。心衰及其前期阶段定义的主观性和模糊性限制了研究、全球监测和预防计划。为了解决这一问题,一些心脏学会和基金会召开会议,在2021年标准化HF的定义,并指定B期或前期HF,以识别有发展为HF风险的个体。在随后的几年中,在预防HF、改善HF诊断和管理以及认识到患者声音的重要性方面取得了实质性进展和变化。心衰的全球差异和差异得到了更好的理解,导致护理差异的原因和合并症也得到了更好的理解,这些差异也受到获得护理的影响。本共识文件提出了心力衰竭的第二个通用定义,旨在标准化术语,并为临床医生、研究人员、卫生系统和政策制定者提供统一的方法。在这一定义中,HF表型的分类脱离了严格的左心室射血分数临界值,而是将HF分为降低、保留和改善的射血分数类别,以更好地反映临床现实。还提出了HF原因的通用分类。该文件还讨论了HF的动态轨迹——改善、缓解和恢复,并强调了社会决定因素和地理差异对HF风险和结局的影响。通过提供一个全面、标准化的心衰定义和分类框架,本文件旨在改善全球范围内心衰的预防、早期发现和管理,最终加强患者护理,促进全球心血管健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
42.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
5097
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC) publishes peer-reviewed articles highlighting all aspects of cardiovascular disease, including original clinical studies, experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance, state-of-the-art papers and viewpoints. Content Profile: -Original Investigations -JACC State-of-the-Art Reviews -JACC Review Topics of the Week -Guidelines & Clinical Documents -JACC Guideline Comparisons -JACC Scientific Expert Panels -Cardiovascular Medicine & Society -Editorial Comments (accompanying every Original Investigation) -Research Letters -Fellows-in-Training/Early Career Professional Pages -Editor’s Pages from the Editor-in-Chief or other invited thought leaders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书