Mariana Sarmet Smiderle Mendes, Franciele Floriani, Christopher Andrew Childs, Leonardo Marchini
{"title":"Ten years of evidence on patient satisfaction with complete dentures: A scoping review.","authors":"Mariana Sarmet Smiderle Mendes, Franciele Floriani, Christopher Andrew Childs, Leonardo Marchini","doi":"10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_25_00358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To update our understanding of the factors influencing complete denture patient satisfaction based on evidence from the past decade.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>A scoping review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to identify articles from five electronic databases: MEDLINE via the PubMed interface, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Studies on patient satisfaction with complete dentures have gradually increased since 2018, peaking in 2022 and 2023. Randomized clinical trials (43%) were the most prevalent study design, followed by cross-sectional (32.9%) and cohort studies (11.4%). The 79 studies evaluated 16,831 individuals, with 51% female participants aged 30-93 years. Patient satisfaction was assessed using the visual analog scale and Likert scale, accounting for 67% of the assessment methods. The key aspects evaluated included comfort, retention, stability, masticatory function, esthetics, and phonetics. The main independent variables associated with satisfaction were fabrication, impression techniques, occlusal schemes, number of follow-ups, gender, age, oral condition, educational level, health history, personality and psychological factors, denture experience, socioeconomic status, dentist experience and communication skills, use of adhesives, and denture hygiene. All the included studies were judged to have a low risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patient satisfaction with complete dentures is influenced by clinical techniques, patient- and dentist-related factors, and prosthesis conditions. Comfort, retention, stability, mastication, and esthetics were the most consistent determinants, whereas emerging evidence suggests that digital workflows may contribute positively.</p>","PeriodicalId":16887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of prosthodontic research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of prosthodontic research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_25_00358","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To update our understanding of the factors influencing complete denture patient satisfaction based on evidence from the past decade.
Study selection: A scoping review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to identify articles from five electronic databases: MEDLINE via the PubMed interface, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane.
Results: Studies on patient satisfaction with complete dentures have gradually increased since 2018, peaking in 2022 and 2023. Randomized clinical trials (43%) were the most prevalent study design, followed by cross-sectional (32.9%) and cohort studies (11.4%). The 79 studies evaluated 16,831 individuals, with 51% female participants aged 30-93 years. Patient satisfaction was assessed using the visual analog scale and Likert scale, accounting for 67% of the assessment methods. The key aspects evaluated included comfort, retention, stability, masticatory function, esthetics, and phonetics. The main independent variables associated with satisfaction were fabrication, impression techniques, occlusal schemes, number of follow-ups, gender, age, oral condition, educational level, health history, personality and psychological factors, denture experience, socioeconomic status, dentist experience and communication skills, use of adhesives, and denture hygiene. All the included studies were judged to have a low risk of bias.
Conclusions: Patient satisfaction with complete dentures is influenced by clinical techniques, patient- and dentist-related factors, and prosthesis conditions. Comfort, retention, stability, mastication, and esthetics were the most consistent determinants, whereas emerging evidence suggests that digital workflows may contribute positively.
目的:通过对近十年来全口义齿患者满意度影响因素的研究,更新我们对全口义齿患者满意度影响因素的认识。研究选择:根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南进行范围审查,从五个电子数据库中确定文章:MEDLINE(通过PubMed界面)、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science和Cochrane。结果:2018年以来,全口义齿患者满意度研究逐渐增加,在2022年和2023年达到顶峰。随机临床试验(43%)是最普遍的研究设计,其次是横断面研究(32.9%)和队列研究(11.4%)。79项研究评估了16,831人,其中51%的女性参与者年龄在30-93岁之间。采用视觉模拟量表和李克特量表评估患者满意度,占评估方法的67%。评估的关键方面包括舒适度、保持力、稳定性、咀嚼功能、美学和语音。与满意度相关的主要自变量为假牙制作、印模技术、咬合方案、随访次数、性别、年龄、口腔状况、文化程度、健康历史、个性和心理因素、义齿经验、社会经济地位、牙医经验和沟通技巧、粘接剂的使用和义齿卫生。所有纳入的研究均被判定为低偏倚风险。结论:患者对全口义齿的满意度受临床技术、患者和牙医相关因素以及义齿条件的影响。舒适、保持、稳定性、咀嚼和美观是最一致的决定因素,而新出现的证据表明,数字工作流程可能会做出积极的贡献。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Prosthodontic Research is published 4 times annually, in January, April, July, and October, under supervision by the Editorial Board of Japan Prosthodontic Society, which selects all materials submitted for publication.
Journal of Prosthodontic Research originated as an official journal of Japan Prosthodontic Society. It has recently developed a long-range plan to become the most prestigious Asian journal of dental research regarding all aspects of oral and occlusal rehabilitation, fixed/removable prosthodontics, oral implantology and applied oral biology and physiology. The Journal will cover all diagnostic and clinical management aspects necessary to reestablish subjective and objective harmonious oral aesthetics and function.
The most-targeted topics:
1) Clinical Epidemiology and Prosthodontics
2) Fixed/Removable Prosthodontics
3) Oral Implantology
4) Prosthodontics-Related Biosciences (Regenerative Medicine, Bone Biology, Mechanobiology, Microbiology/Immunology)
5) Oral Physiology and Biomechanics (Masticating and Swallowing Function, Parafunction, e.g., bruxism)
6) Orofacial Pain and Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs)
7) Adhesive Dentistry / Dental Materials / Aesthetic Dentistry
8) Maxillofacial Prosthodontics and Dysphagia Rehabilitation
9) Digital Dentistry
Prosthodontic treatment may become necessary as a result of developmental or acquired disturbances in the orofacial region, of orofacial trauma, or of a variety of dental and oral diseases and orofacial pain conditions.
Reviews, Original articles, technical procedure and case reports can be submitted. Letters to the Editor commenting on papers or any aspect of Journal of Prosthodontic Research are welcomed.