Latency and persistence of renewal in an intensive outpatient clinic

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Matthew J. O'Brien, Alexander M. Pauls, Sara R. Jeglum, Carla N. Martinez-Perez, Christopher T. Franck, Ishita Aggarwal, Christopher A. Podlesnik
{"title":"Latency and persistence of renewal in an intensive outpatient clinic","authors":"Matthew J. O'Brien,&nbsp;Alexander M. Pauls,&nbsp;Sara R. Jeglum,&nbsp;Carla N. Martinez-Perez,&nbsp;Christopher T. Franck,&nbsp;Ishita Aggarwal,&nbsp;Christopher A. Podlesnik","doi":"10.1002/jaba.70071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Treatment durability can be compromised when challenging behavior recurs following context changes (i.e., renewal), yet the temporal features of lapses have not been well described in large clinical samples. We examined latency to onset and persistence of renewal to inform clinical monitoring and planning following context changes. Using a retrospective consecutive case series of 98 patients receiving intensive outpatient treatment for challenging behavior, we analyzed 749 context changes involving person, setting, and task variables. Renewal emerged quickly (<i>M</i> = 1–2 sessions), with half beginning in the first postchange session. Persistence was often brief (49.74% resolved within one session), whereas 32.28% persisted for three or more sessions and 12.17% for five or more. Latency and persistence did not differ meaningfully across context-change types. Latency was not systematically associated with magnitude or persistence, whereas greater renewal magnitude predicted prolonged persistence. Results support extended monitoring and high-fidelity implementation following context changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14983,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied behavior analysis","volume":"59 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jaba.70071","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied behavior analysis","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jaba.70071","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Treatment durability can be compromised when challenging behavior recurs following context changes (i.e., renewal), yet the temporal features of lapses have not been well described in large clinical samples. We examined latency to onset and persistence of renewal to inform clinical monitoring and planning following context changes. Using a retrospective consecutive case series of 98 patients receiving intensive outpatient treatment for challenging behavior, we analyzed 749 context changes involving person, setting, and task variables. Renewal emerged quickly (M = 1–2 sessions), with half beginning in the first postchange session. Persistence was often brief (49.74% resolved within one session), whereas 32.28% persisted for three or more sessions and 12.17% for five or more. Latency and persistence did not differ meaningfully across context-change types. Latency was not systematically associated with magnitude or persistence, whereas greater renewal magnitude predicted prolonged persistence. Results support extended monitoring and high-fidelity implementation following context changes.

Abstract Image

重症门诊的潜伏期和持续性更新。
当挑战行为在环境变化(即更新)后再次出现时,治疗的持久性可能会受到损害,但在大型临床样本中,失效的时间特征尚未得到很好的描述。我们检查了发病的潜伏期和复发的持久性,以便为临床监测和环境变化后的计划提供信息。通过对98例因挑战行为而接受强化门诊治疗的患者的回顾性连续病例系列,我们分析了749个涉及人、环境和任务变量的环境变化。更新出现得很快(M = 1-2次),其中一半是在更改后的第一次会话中开始的。持续时间通常很短(49.74%在一个疗程内解决),而32.28%持续了三个或更多疗程,12.17%持续了五个或更多疗程。延迟和持久性在不同的上下文更改类型之间没有显著差异。潜伏期与强度或持续时间没有系统关联,而更新强度越大,持续时间越长。结果支持在上下文更改后扩展监视和高保真实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of applied behavior analysis
Journal of applied behavior analysis PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
20.70%
发文量
61
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书