Can social media videos meet patients' information needs for benign prostatic hyperplasia? A repeated cross-sectional study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Chengyang Tian, Weibo Wang, Junyue Tao, Guangyue Luo, Jun Zhou
{"title":"Can social media videos meet patients' information needs for benign prostatic hyperplasia? A repeated cross-sectional study.","authors":"Chengyang Tian, Weibo Wang, Junyue Tao, Guangyue Luo, Jun Zhou","doi":"10.1186/s12894-026-02234-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common urological condition among older men and can cause lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). As patients increasingly seek disease-related information through social media, evaluations of the quality, reliability, and transparency of patient-facing BPH content remain limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Repeated cross-sectional searches were conducted on Bilibili and TikTok on December 1, 16, and 31, 2025. Basic video characteristics were extracted. Video reliability, quality, and transparency were assessed using the modified DISCERN (mDISCERN), Global Quality Score (GQS), and the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, respectively. Exploratory supplementary assessments of content coverage and accessibility-related features were conducted using the content coverage checklist (CCC) and video accessibility checklist (VAC). Potentially misleading or harmful information signals were also descriptively assessed. Spearman correlation analysis and ordinal logistic regression were performed to examine associations between video characteristics and assessment scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 217 videos were included. Overall, the median (IQR) scores were 3.00 (2.00-3.00) for mDISCERN, 3.00 (2.00-3.00) for GQS, and 2.00 (2.00-2.00) for JAMA. In exploratory supplementary analyses, the median (IQR) scores were 3.00 (2.00-4.00) for CCC and 6.00 (5.00-6.00) for VAC. Potentially misleading or harmful information signals were observed in 29 videos (13.4%). Videos published by professional individuals and professional institutions had significantly higher mDISCERN, GQS, and JAMA scores than those published by non-professional individuals (all P < 0.001). Spearman correlation analysis and ordinal logistic regression indicated that engagement metrics were not independent predictors of assessment scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, BPH-related videos on social media showed moderate reliability, quality, and transparency, but consistently high-value content remained limited. A minority of videos also contained potentially misleading or harmful information signals. Videos from professional sources tended to provide higher-quality information, whereas user engagement was not a reliable indicator of content quality. These findings suggest that urologists and healthcare institutions may have an important role in providing more structured, understandable, and patient-oriented digital education for men seeking BPH information online.</p>","PeriodicalId":9285,"journal":{"name":"BMC Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13576117/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-026-02234-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common urological condition among older men and can cause lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). As patients increasingly seek disease-related information through social media, evaluations of the quality, reliability, and transparency of patient-facing BPH content remain limited.

Methods: Repeated cross-sectional searches were conducted on Bilibili and TikTok on December 1, 16, and 31, 2025. Basic video characteristics were extracted. Video reliability, quality, and transparency were assessed using the modified DISCERN (mDISCERN), Global Quality Score (GQS), and the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, respectively. Exploratory supplementary assessments of content coverage and accessibility-related features were conducted using the content coverage checklist (CCC) and video accessibility checklist (VAC). Potentially misleading or harmful information signals were also descriptively assessed. Spearman correlation analysis and ordinal logistic regression were performed to examine associations between video characteristics and assessment scores.

Results: A total of 217 videos were included. Overall, the median (IQR) scores were 3.00 (2.00-3.00) for mDISCERN, 3.00 (2.00-3.00) for GQS, and 2.00 (2.00-2.00) for JAMA. In exploratory supplementary analyses, the median (IQR) scores were 3.00 (2.00-4.00) for CCC and 6.00 (5.00-6.00) for VAC. Potentially misleading or harmful information signals were observed in 29 videos (13.4%). Videos published by professional individuals and professional institutions had significantly higher mDISCERN, GQS, and JAMA scores than those published by non-professional individuals (all P < 0.001). Spearman correlation analysis and ordinal logistic regression indicated that engagement metrics were not independent predictors of assessment scores.

Conclusions: Overall, BPH-related videos on social media showed moderate reliability, quality, and transparency, but consistently high-value content remained limited. A minority of videos also contained potentially misleading or harmful information signals. Videos from professional sources tended to provide higher-quality information, whereas user engagement was not a reliable indicator of content quality. These findings suggest that urologists and healthcare institutions may have an important role in providing more structured, understandable, and patient-oriented digital education for men seeking BPH information online.

社交媒体视频能否满足良性前列腺增生患者的信息需求?一个重复的横断面研究。
背景:良性前列腺增生(BPH)是老年男性常见的泌尿系统疾病,可引起下尿路症状(LUTS)。随着患者越来越多地通过社交媒体寻求与疾病相关的信息,对面向患者的BPH内容的质量、可靠性和透明度的评估仍然有限。方法:于2025年12月1日、16日和31日在Bilibili和TikTok上进行重复横断面搜索。提取基本视频特征。视频的可靠性、质量和透明度分别采用改进的DISCERN (mDISCERN)、全球质量评分(GQS)和美国医学协会杂志(JAMA)基准标准进行评估。使用内容覆盖检查表(CCC)和视频可访问性检查表(VAC)对内容覆盖和可访问性相关特征进行探索性补充评估。还对可能具有误导性或有害的信息信号进行了描述性评估。采用Spearman相关分析和有序逻辑回归来检验视频特征与评估分数之间的关系。结果:共纳入视频217段。总体而言,mDISCERN的中位(IQR)评分为3.00 (2.00-3.00),GQS为3.00 (2.00-3.00),JAMA为2.00(2.00-2.00)。在探索性补充分析中,CCC的中位(IQR)评分为3.00 (2.00-4.00),VAC的中位(IQR)评分为6.00(5.00-6.00)。在29个视频(13.4%)中观察到潜在的误导或有害信息信号。专业人士和专业机构发布的视频的mDISCERN、GQS和JAMA得分显著高于非专业人士发布的视频(均为P)。结论:总体而言,社交媒体上与bph相关的视频具有中等的可靠性、质量和透明度,但始终如一的高价值内容仍然有限。少数视频还含有可能误导或有害的信息信号。来自专业来源的视频往往提供更高质量的信息,而用户参与度并不是内容质量的可靠指标。这些发现表明,泌尿科医生和医疗机构可能在为在线寻求BPH信息的男性提供更结构化、可理解和以患者为导向的数字教育方面发挥重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Urology
BMC Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Urology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of urological disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The journal considers manuscripts in the following broad subject-specific sections of urology: Endourology and technology Epidemiology and health outcomes Pediatric urology Pre-clinical and basic research Reconstructive urology Sexual function and fertility Urological imaging Urological oncology Voiding dysfunction Case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书