Patti Nijhuis, Cecilie Møller, Joshua S. Bamford, Jan Stupacher
{"title":"Polyrhythm Perception and Production: A Scoping Review","authors":"Patti Nijhuis, Cecilie Møller, Joshua S. Bamford, Jan Stupacher","doi":"10.1111/nyas.70330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In music, rhythms can range from simple isochrony to complex polyrhythms, in which multiple nonharmonically related metrical hierarchies are superimposed (e.g., 2:3, 4:5). This scoping review synthesizes 64 studies comprising 96 experiments on polyrhythm perception and production. Over the past decades, research has shown that factors such as polyrhythm ratio, tempo, sensory modality, and musical training shape how we perceive and produce polyrhythms. Although most reviewed studies lack subjective measurements of polyrhythm complexity, behavioral tasks suggest that ratio sum (e.g., five in 2:3) and the Farey tree offer rough complexity estimates. While tempo affects which periodicity is perceived as the underlying beat, these effects are limited by the preference for binary subdivision grouping. Finally, the reviewed literature suggests that polyrhythms are more often perceived as integrated patterns than segregated streams. For future research, we recommend defining polyrhythms as the superposition of two or more nonharmonically related pulses that share a common cycle, and adding a clear description of whether these pulses are isochronous stimuli or perceived beats extracted from nonisochronous stimuli. Combining behavioral and subjective measures across different polyrhythmic contexts could clarify subjective complexity and under which circumstances polyrhythms are perceived and produced as integrated rhythms or segregated pulses.</p>","PeriodicalId":8250,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","volume":"1561 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/nyas.70330","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nyas.70330","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In music, rhythms can range from simple isochrony to complex polyrhythms, in which multiple nonharmonically related metrical hierarchies are superimposed (e.g., 2:3, 4:5). This scoping review synthesizes 64 studies comprising 96 experiments on polyrhythm perception and production. Over the past decades, research has shown that factors such as polyrhythm ratio, tempo, sensory modality, and musical training shape how we perceive and produce polyrhythms. Although most reviewed studies lack subjective measurements of polyrhythm complexity, behavioral tasks suggest that ratio sum (e.g., five in 2:3) and the Farey tree offer rough complexity estimates. While tempo affects which periodicity is perceived as the underlying beat, these effects are limited by the preference for binary subdivision grouping. Finally, the reviewed literature suggests that polyrhythms are more often perceived as integrated patterns than segregated streams. For future research, we recommend defining polyrhythms as the superposition of two or more nonharmonically related pulses that share a common cycle, and adding a clear description of whether these pulses are isochronous stimuli or perceived beats extracted from nonisochronous stimuli. Combining behavioral and subjective measures across different polyrhythmic contexts could clarify subjective complexity and under which circumstances polyrhythms are perceived and produced as integrated rhythms or segregated pulses.
期刊介绍:
Published on behalf of the New York Academy of Sciences, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences provides multidisciplinary perspectives on research of current scientific interest with far-reaching implications for the wider scientific community and society at large. Each special issue assembles the best thinking of key contributors to a field of investigation at a time when emerging developments offer the promise of new insight. Individually themed, Annals special issues stimulate new ways to think about science by providing a neutral forum for discourse—within and across many institutions and fields.