Nicole Black, Lachlan Deer, David W. Johnston, Johannes S. Kunz
{"title":"EXPRESS: Are You Okay? Effects of a National Peer-Support Campaign on Mental Health","authors":"Nicole Black, Lachlan Deer, David W. Johnston, Johannes S. Kunz","doi":"10.1177/00222429261467752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"National public health awareness campaigns that emphasize peer-to-peer support are increasingly adopted, but evidence on the effects of peer-based programs at scale remains limited. Using quasi-experimental methods, we examine whether the prominent nationwide “R U OK? Day” campaign affects short-term mental health outcomes in Australia. Leveraging survey and administrative data, we find R U OK? Day leads to a 4% of a standard deviation increase in self-reported mental wellbeing, with the effect particularly pronounced among middle-aged males who experience a 9% of a standard deviation increase. We find no detectable effects on mental health care utilization, and we detect no statistically significant changes in suicide-related deaths in the short run, though the mortality outcomes are rare and power is limited. Our results underscore that peer-based campaigns can improve mental wellbeing, especially for high-risk groups, and point to a distinction between short-run psychological responses and outcomes that require behavioural follow-through.","PeriodicalId":16152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marketing","volume":"436 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429261467752","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
National public health awareness campaigns that emphasize peer-to-peer support are increasingly adopted, but evidence on the effects of peer-based programs at scale remains limited. Using quasi-experimental methods, we examine whether the prominent nationwide “R U OK? Day” campaign affects short-term mental health outcomes in Australia. Leveraging survey and administrative data, we find R U OK? Day leads to a 4% of a standard deviation increase in self-reported mental wellbeing, with the effect particularly pronounced among middle-aged males who experience a 9% of a standard deviation increase. We find no detectable effects on mental health care utilization, and we detect no statistically significant changes in suicide-related deaths in the short run, though the mortality outcomes are rare and power is limited. Our results underscore that peer-based campaigns can improve mental wellbeing, especially for high-risk groups, and point to a distinction between short-run psychological responses and outcomes that require behavioural follow-through.
越来越多的人采用了强调同伴支持的国家公共卫生意识运动,但关于大规模的基于同伴的项目效果的证据仍然有限。采用准实验方法,我们考察了全国范围内突出的“R U OK?”“一天”运动影响澳大利亚的短期心理健康结果。利用调查和管理数据,我们发现R U OK?每天会导致自我报告的心理健康水平增加4%的标准差,其中中年男性的影响尤为明显,他们的心理健康水平会增加9%的标准差。我们没有发现对精神卫生保健利用的可检测的影响,我们也没有发现在短期内自杀相关死亡的统计显著变化,尽管死亡率结果很少,权力有限。我们的研究结果强调,以同伴为基础的运动可以改善心理健康,特别是对高危人群,并指出短期心理反应和需要行为跟进的结果之间的区别。
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1936,the Journal of Marketing (JM) serves as a premier outlet for substantive research in marketing. JM is dedicated to developing and disseminating knowledge about real-world marketing questions, catering to scholars, educators, managers, policy makers, consumers, and other global societal stakeholders. Over the years,JM has played a crucial role in shaping the content and boundaries of the marketing discipline.