Intraoperative C-arm CBCT versus early postoperative MRI for the assessment of fracture reduction and osteosynthesis material positioning in cranio-maxillofacial trauma surgery.

IF 1.8
Adib Al-Haj Husain, Sameena Sandhu, Egon Burian, Marc M Precht, Stefan Sommer, Thomas Frauenfelder, Maximilian Eberhard Hermann Wagner, Harald Essig
{"title":"Intraoperative C-arm CBCT versus early postoperative MRI for the assessment of fracture reduction and osteosynthesis material positioning in cranio-maxillofacial trauma surgery.","authors":"Adib Al-Haj Husain, Sameena Sandhu, Egon Burian, Marc M Precht, Stefan Sommer, Thomas Frauenfelder, Maximilian Eberhard Hermann Wagner, Harald Essig","doi":"10.1007/s10006-026-01588-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare intraoperative C-arm cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) with dedicated in-house-optimized magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols, including CT-like and metal artifact reduction sequences (MARS), using a novel 15-channel coil for the evaluation of fracture reduction, osteosynthesis material positioning, and the depiction of plates and screws.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen patients (13 men, 2 women; median age, 32 years; range, 18-65 years) with acute cranio-maxillofacial fractures underwent surgical treatment with intraoperative CBCT, followed by early postoperative MRI within 36 h. MRI protocols included 3D ultrashort echo time (UTE), slice-encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC), and 3D double-echo steady-state (DESS). Two independent maxillofacial surgeons performed qualitative and quantitative evaluations of fracture reduction, osteosynthesis material positioning, and implant morphology using a 5-point visual scale (5 = best; 1 = non-assessable) and dimensional measurements. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and inter-reader agreement was assessed using weighted kappa (κ) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>UTE and SEMAC sequences provided excellent CT-like performance in visualizing fracture reduction and implant positioning (median 5, IQR 5-5 and 4-5, respectively), with minimal absolute differences in quantitative measurements and substantial to almost perfect inter-reader agreement (κ = 0.75-1.0; ICC = 0.89-0.99; all p < 0.001). In contrast, DESS demonstrated limited utility for assessing metallic implants due to pronounced signal voids and susceptibility artifacts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>UTE and SEMAC provide high-quality, radiation-free imaging for evaluating fracture reduction and osteosynthesis material in cranio-maxillofacial trauma. These techniques demonstrate comparable diagnostic performance to intraoperative CBCT in a postoperative setting. They may serve as a radiation-free alternative for perioperative imaging in younger patients with anticipated repeated imaging needs, pending prospective intraoperative validation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>Swiss National Clinical Trials Portal: SNCTP000006343, ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT07012850, Registration date: May 2025.</p>","PeriodicalId":520733,"journal":{"name":"Oral and maxillofacial surgery","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13309464/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral and maxillofacial surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-026-01588-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare intraoperative C-arm cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) with dedicated in-house-optimized magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols, including CT-like and metal artifact reduction sequences (MARS), using a novel 15-channel coil for the evaluation of fracture reduction, osteosynthesis material positioning, and the depiction of plates and screws.

Methods: Fifteen patients (13 men, 2 women; median age, 32 years; range, 18-65 years) with acute cranio-maxillofacial fractures underwent surgical treatment with intraoperative CBCT, followed by early postoperative MRI within 36 h. MRI protocols included 3D ultrashort echo time (UTE), slice-encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC), and 3D double-echo steady-state (DESS). Two independent maxillofacial surgeons performed qualitative and quantitative evaluations of fracture reduction, osteosynthesis material positioning, and implant morphology using a 5-point visual scale (5 = best; 1 = non-assessable) and dimensional measurements. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and inter-reader agreement was assessed using weighted kappa (κ) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).

Results: UTE and SEMAC sequences provided excellent CT-like performance in visualizing fracture reduction and implant positioning (median 5, IQR 5-5 and 4-5, respectively), with minimal absolute differences in quantitative measurements and substantial to almost perfect inter-reader agreement (κ = 0.75-1.0; ICC = 0.89-0.99; all p < 0.001). In contrast, DESS demonstrated limited utility for assessing metallic implants due to pronounced signal voids and susceptibility artifacts.

Conclusion: UTE and SEMAC provide high-quality, radiation-free imaging for evaluating fracture reduction and osteosynthesis material in cranio-maxillofacial trauma. These techniques demonstrate comparable diagnostic performance to intraoperative CBCT in a postoperative setting. They may serve as a radiation-free alternative for perioperative imaging in younger patients with anticipated repeated imaging needs, pending prospective intraoperative validation.

Trial registration number: Swiss National Clinical Trials Portal: SNCTP000006343, ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT07012850, Registration date: May 2025.

术中c臂CBCT与术后早期MRI对比评估颅颌面外伤手术骨折复位和骨合成材料定位。
目的:比较术中c臂锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)与专用的内部优化磁共振成像(MRI)方案,包括ct样和金属伪影复位序列(MARS),使用新型15通道线圈评估骨折复位、骨合成材料定位以及钢板和螺钉的描绘。方法:15例急性颅颌面骨折患者(男13例,女2例,中位年龄32岁,年龄范围18-65岁)行术中CBCT手术治疗,术后早期36 h内行MRI。MRI方案包括三维超短回波时间(UTE)、金属伪影校正切片编码(SEMAC)和三维双回波稳态(DESS)。两名独立的颌面外科医生使用5点视觉评分(5 =最佳;1 =不可评估)和尺寸测量对骨折复位、骨合成材料定位和种植体形态进行定性和定量评估。计算描述性统计量,并使用加权kappa (κ)和类内相关系数(ICC)评估读者间一致性。结果:UTE和SEMAC序列在显示骨折复位和植入物定位方面提供了出色的ct样性能(中位数分别为5,IQR分别为5-5和4-5),定量测量的绝对差异极小,并且具有几乎完美的读者间一致性(κ = 0.75-1.0; ICC = 0.89-0.99;所有p)。结论:UTE和SEMAC为评估颅颌面外伤的骨折复位和植骨材料提供了高质量,无辐射的成像。这些技术在术后环境下的诊断性能与术中CBCT相当。他们可以作为无辐射替代围手术期成像的年轻患者预期的重复成像需求,有待于前瞻性术中验证。试验注册号:瑞士国家临床试验门户网站:SNCTP000006343, ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT07012850,注册日期:2025年5月。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书