Comparing government-sponsored and community-based safety-nets for health and wellbeing among Latiné adults in California.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q1 ETHNIC STUDIES
Roberto J Mercado-López, Micah R Lattaner, Tatiana Londoño, Alice P Villatoro
{"title":"Comparing government-sponsored and community-based safety-nets for health and wellbeing among Latiné adults in California.","authors":"Roberto J Mercado-López, Micah R Lattaner, Tatiana Londoño, Alice P Villatoro","doi":"10.1080/13557858.2026.2692953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Latiné populations in the United States face a persistent health and mental health burden, in part driven by stressors associated with social determinants of health. In response, it is critical to develop a nuanced understanding of Latiné communities' perceptions of government- and community-based social safety-net services, both as distinct and interacting systems, designed to support health and social needs of Latiné adults.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We conducted semi-structured interviews with Latiné adults (<i>N</i> = 13) in English and Spanish to explore perceptions of and experiences with government-sponsored and community-based safety-net services, as well as the implications for health and wellbeing. A thematic analysis approach was used to identify emergent themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Themes highlight shared and unique factors that enable and inhibit access to safety-net services from government- and community-based systems. Awareness of safety-net services and their benefits facilitated access to both systems, but knowledge of rights surrounding eligibility enabled access to government-based services in particular. In contrast, limited awareness of service availability and concerns about quality of services created barriers to access across both community- and government-based services. Unique to government-based services, complex and burdensome application processes, mistrust, and stigma associated with using public assistance were highlighted as barriers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings provide critical insights to improve Latiné communities' access to safety-net systems to support health and wellbeing. Our results highlight the need to: strengthen communication strategies to inform resource awareness and counteract misinformation; rebuild trust between government institutions and communities; reduce stigma and shame surrounding safety-net service utilization; simplify bureaucratic processes for using government safety-nets; and foster connections between community and government systems to enhance access to services that address upstream social determinants of health. These strategies represent steps towards building more accessible safety-net systems to support the health and wellbeing of Latiné communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":51038,"journal":{"name":"Ethnicity & Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnicity & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13557858.2026.2692953","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Latiné populations in the United States face a persistent health and mental health burden, in part driven by stressors associated with social determinants of health. In response, it is critical to develop a nuanced understanding of Latiné communities' perceptions of government- and community-based social safety-net services, both as distinct and interacting systems, designed to support health and social needs of Latiné adults.

Design: We conducted semi-structured interviews with Latiné adults (N = 13) in English and Spanish to explore perceptions of and experiences with government-sponsored and community-based safety-net services, as well as the implications for health and wellbeing. A thematic analysis approach was used to identify emergent themes.

Results: Themes highlight shared and unique factors that enable and inhibit access to safety-net services from government- and community-based systems. Awareness of safety-net services and their benefits facilitated access to both systems, but knowledge of rights surrounding eligibility enabled access to government-based services in particular. In contrast, limited awareness of service availability and concerns about quality of services created barriers to access across both community- and government-based services. Unique to government-based services, complex and burdensome application processes, mistrust, and stigma associated with using public assistance were highlighted as barriers.

Conclusion: Findings provide critical insights to improve Latiné communities' access to safety-net systems to support health and wellbeing. Our results highlight the need to: strengthen communication strategies to inform resource awareness and counteract misinformation; rebuild trust between government institutions and communities; reduce stigma and shame surrounding safety-net service utilization; simplify bureaucratic processes for using government safety-nets; and foster connections between community and government systems to enhance access to services that address upstream social determinants of health. These strategies represent steps towards building more accessible safety-net systems to support the health and wellbeing of Latiné communities.

比较加州拉丁裔成年人中政府资助的和基于社区的健康和福利安全网。
目的:美国的拉丁裔人口面临着持续的健康和精神健康负担,部分原因是与健康的社会决定因素相关的压力因素。为此,至关重要的是要对拉丁裔社区对政府和基于社区的社会安全网服务的看法进行细致入微的了解,这两种服务都是不同的和相互作用的系统,旨在支持拉丁裔成年人的健康和社会需求。设计:我们用英语和西班牙语对拉丁裔成年人(N = 13)进行了半结构化访谈,以探索对政府资助和基于社区的安全网服务的看法和经验,以及对健康和福祉的影响。使用主题分析方法来确定紧急主题。结果:主题突出了促进和阻碍从政府和社区系统获得安全网服务的共同和独特因素。对安全网服务及其好处的认识有助于获得这两个系统,但对有关资格的权利的了解尤其有助于获得基于政府的服务。相比之下,对服务可得性的认识有限以及对服务质量的关切造成了利用社区和政府服务的障碍。以政府为基础的服务所特有的、复杂和繁琐的申请程序、与使用公共援助有关的不信任和耻辱被强调为障碍。结论:研究结果为改善拉丁裔社区获得安全网系统以支持健康和福祉提供了重要见解。我们的研究结果强调需要:加强沟通战略,告知资源意识和抵制错误信息;重建政府机构与社区之间的信任;减少围绕安全网服务利用的污名和羞耻感;简化使用政府安全网的官僚程序;并促进社区和政府系统之间的联系,以增加获得服务的机会,解决健康的上游社会决定因素。这些战略是朝着建立更容易获得的安全网系统,以支持拉丁裔社区的健康和福祉迈出的步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ethnicity & Health
Ethnicity & Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ethnicity & Health is an international academic journal designed to meet the world-wide interest in the health of ethnic groups. It embraces original papers from the full range of disciplines concerned with investigating the relationship between ’ethnicity’ and ’health’ (including medicine and nursing, public health, epidemiology, social sciences, population sciences, and statistics). The journal also covers issues of culture, religion, gender, class, migration, lifestyle and racism, in so far as they relate to health and its anthropological and social aspects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书