A Socially Assistive Robot for Outpatient Eating Disorder Waiting-List Support: A Mixed-Methods Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
European Eating Disorders Review Pub Date : 2026-10-12 Epub Date: 2026-06-26 DOI:10.1002/erv.70141
Dimitri Chubinidze, Zhuo Li, Ayse Gundogan, Karina L. Allen, Petr Slovak, Kate Tchanturia
{"title":"A Socially Assistive Robot for Outpatient Eating Disorder Waiting-List Support: A Mixed-Methods Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial","authors":"Dimitri Chubinidze,&nbsp;Zhuo Li,&nbsp;Ayse Gundogan,&nbsp;Karina L. Allen,&nbsp;Petr Slovak,&nbsp;Kate Tchanturia","doi":"10.1002/erv.70141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT) evaluated Purrble, a socially assistive robot for emotion regulation, as a low-intensity adjunct during waitlist periods in adult eating disorder services.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Adults waiting for outpatient eating disorder treatment were randomised to four weeks of Purrble use or waitlist-as-usual. The primary outcome was emotion regulation, assessed with the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale; secondary outcomes included sensory sensitivity, anxiety, depression, and motivation for change. Analyses were conducted using paired <i>t</i>-tests and linear mixed-effects models. Acceptability was explored via a qualitative survey.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>39 participants were enrolled in the trial and 37 participants were retained (19 Purrble, 18 control). A significant group × time interaction emerged for depression, with greater reductions in symptoms among Purrble participants. No significant interactions were found for emotion regulation, sensory sensitivity, motivation, or anxiety, though the Purrble group showed small-to-moderate improvements in emotion regulation, sensory sensitivity, and anxiety, and a significant within-group increase in motivation. Qualitative findings identified four categories: situational use during distress, sensory comfort and emotional connection, design limitations/barriers, and continued use with integration into self-care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Purrble proved acceptable and feasible as a waitlist adjunct in adult eating disorder outpatient services. A significant between-group effect on depression and a within-group improvement in motivation provide preliminary support for a fully powered trial.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48117,"journal":{"name":"European Eating Disorders Review","volume":"34 6","pages":"1562-1573"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/erv.70141","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Eating Disorders Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/erv.70141","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT) evaluated Purrble, a socially assistive robot for emotion regulation, as a low-intensity adjunct during waitlist periods in adult eating disorder services.

Method

Adults waiting for outpatient eating disorder treatment were randomised to four weeks of Purrble use or waitlist-as-usual. The primary outcome was emotion regulation, assessed with the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale; secondary outcomes included sensory sensitivity, anxiety, depression, and motivation for change. Analyses were conducted using paired t-tests and linear mixed-effects models. Acceptability was explored via a qualitative survey.

Results

39 participants were enrolled in the trial and 37 participants were retained (19 Purrble, 18 control). A significant group × time interaction emerged for depression, with greater reductions in symptoms among Purrble participants. No significant interactions were found for emotion regulation, sensory sensitivity, motivation, or anxiety, though the Purrble group showed small-to-moderate improvements in emotion regulation, sensory sensitivity, and anxiety, and a significant within-group increase in motivation. Qualitative findings identified four categories: situational use during distress, sensory comfort and emotional connection, design limitations/barriers, and continued use with integration into self-care.

Conclusions

Purrble proved acceptable and feasible as a waitlist adjunct in adult eating disorder outpatient services. A significant between-group effect on depression and a within-group improvement in motivation provide preliminary support for a fully powered trial.

一个社会辅助机器人门诊进食障碍等候名单支持:一项混合方法可行性随机对照试验。
目的:本可行性随机对照试验(RCT)评估了情绪调节社交辅助机器人Purrble在成人饮食失调服务等候期的低强度辅助。方法:等待门诊进食障碍治疗的成年人被随机分为四个星期的Purrble使用或像往常一样等待。主要结局为情绪调节,用情绪调节困难量表评估;次要结果包括感觉敏感性、焦虑、抑郁和改变的动机。采用配对t检验和线性混合效应模型进行分析。通过定性调查探讨可接受性。结果:39名受试者被纳入试验,37名受试者被保留(Purrble 19人,control 18人)。抑郁症出现了显著的组×时间相互作用,Purrble参与者的症状减轻幅度更大。虽然Purrble组在情绪调节、感觉敏感性、动机或焦虑方面有小到中度的改善,但在情绪调节、感觉敏感性和焦虑方面没有发现显著的相互作用,并且在组内动机方面有显著的增加。定性研究结果确定了四个类别:痛苦时的情境使用,感官舒适和情感联系,设计限制/障碍,以及融入自我护理的持续使用。结论:Purrble被证明是可接受和可行的候补名单辅助成人饮食失调门诊服务。抑郁的显著组间效应和动机的组内改善为一项全面有力的试验提供了初步支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Eating Disorders Review
European Eating Disorders Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.50%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: European Eating Disorders Review publishes authoritative and accessible articles, from all over the world, which review or report original research that has implications for the treatment and care of people with eating disorders, and articles which report innovations and experience in the clinical management of eating disorders. The journal focuses on implications for best practice in diagnosis and treatment. The journal also provides a forum for discussion of the causes and prevention of eating disorders, and related health policy. The aims of the journal are to offer a channel of communication between researchers, practitioners, administrators and policymakers who need to report and understand developments in the field of eating disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书