Explaining inequalities in quality of life: a longitudinal study of health disparities in Norway.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jan Abel Olsen, Gang Chen, Ola Løvsletten
{"title":"Explaining inequalities in quality of life: a longitudinal study of health disparities in Norway.","authors":"Jan Abel Olsen, Gang Chen, Ola Løvsletten","doi":"10.1007/s11136-026-04311-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Studies of health inequalities often examine the association between a single health indicator and a single socioeconomic indicator. Recent research has increasingly explored social disparities in self-reported quality of life. However, most evidences are based on cross-sectional survey and the role of health behaviours is frequently overlooked in these analyses. This study aims to integrate broader sets of socioeconomic and behavioural variables to better explain health disparities that emerge in later adulthood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using longitudinal data from the Norwegian population-based Tromsø Study, we followed 11,313 adults aged 25-54 at baseline over 21 years. A series of self-reported outcomes were studied, particularly EQ-5D-5L values, EQ-VAS scores, and Self-Rated Health. Predictors included three socioeconomic indicators (childhood living standard, own and spouse's educational attainment) and three health behaviours (smoking, physical activity, obesity). Shapley value decompositions were used to quantify each predictor's contribution to explained variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For all three health outcomes, health behaviours accounted for the majority of the explained variance compared to socioeconomic factors: 80% for EQ-5D-5L, 75% for EQ VAS, and 67% for Self-Rated Health. When adjusting for differences in baseline health, the relative importance of health behaviours increased slightly.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study underscores the critical role of health behaviours in explaining inequalities in quality of life, providing new insights into the mechanisms driving these disparities. While preventing childhood deprivation would have significant impact on adult health, potential health benefits of promoting healthy behaviours are substantial. Both types of policy interventions could thereby contribute to reducing health inequalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":20748,"journal":{"name":"Quality of Life Research","volume":"35 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13310827/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality of Life Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-026-04311-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Studies of health inequalities often examine the association between a single health indicator and a single socioeconomic indicator. Recent research has increasingly explored social disparities in self-reported quality of life. However, most evidences are based on cross-sectional survey and the role of health behaviours is frequently overlooked in these analyses. This study aims to integrate broader sets of socioeconomic and behavioural variables to better explain health disparities that emerge in later adulthood.

Methods: Using longitudinal data from the Norwegian population-based Tromsø Study, we followed 11,313 adults aged 25-54 at baseline over 21 years. A series of self-reported outcomes were studied, particularly EQ-5D-5L values, EQ-VAS scores, and Self-Rated Health. Predictors included three socioeconomic indicators (childhood living standard, own and spouse's educational attainment) and three health behaviours (smoking, physical activity, obesity). Shapley value decompositions were used to quantify each predictor's contribution to explained variance.

Results: For all three health outcomes, health behaviours accounted for the majority of the explained variance compared to socioeconomic factors: 80% for EQ-5D-5L, 75% for EQ VAS, and 67% for Self-Rated Health. When adjusting for differences in baseline health, the relative importance of health behaviours increased slightly.

Conclusion: This study underscores the critical role of health behaviours in explaining inequalities in quality of life, providing new insights into the mechanisms driving these disparities. While preventing childhood deprivation would have significant impact on adult health, potential health benefits of promoting healthy behaviours are substantial. Both types of policy interventions could thereby contribute to reducing health inequalities.

解释生活质量不平等:对挪威健康差异的纵向研究。
目的:对健康不平等现象的研究往往考察单一健康指标与单一社会经济指标之间的关联。最近的研究越来越多地探讨了自我报告生活质量的社会差异。然而,大多数证据都是基于横断面调查,健康行为的作用在这些分析中经常被忽视。这项研究旨在整合更广泛的社会经济和行为变量,以更好地解释成年后期出现的健康差异。方法:使用挪威人口为基础的特罗姆瑟研究的纵向数据,我们跟踪了11,313名25-54岁的成年人,基线超过21年。研究了一系列自我报告的结果,特别是EQ-5D-5L值、EQ-VAS评分和自评健康。预测指标包括三个社会经济指标(儿童生活水平、自己和配偶的教育程度)和三个健康行为(吸烟、体育活动、肥胖)。沙普利值分解用于量化每个预测因子对解释方差的贡献。结果:与社会经济因素相比,对于所有三种健康结果,健康行为占解释方差的大部分:EQ- 5d - 5l占80%,EQ VAS占75%,自评健康占67%。在对基线健康差异进行调整后,健康行为的相对重要性略有增加。结论:这项研究强调了健康行为在解释生活质量不平等方面的关键作用,为推动这些不平等的机制提供了新的见解。虽然防止童年剥夺将对成人健康产生重大影响,但促进健康行为的潜在健康益处是巨大的。因此,这两种类型的政策干预都有助于减少保健不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quality of Life Research
Quality of Life Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
8.60%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Quality of Life Research is an international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the rapid communication of original research, theoretical articles and methodological reports related to the field of quality of life, in all the health sciences. The journal also offers editorials, literature, book and software reviews, correspondence and abstracts of conferences. Quality of life has become a prominent issue in biometry, philosophy, social science, clinical medicine, health services and outcomes research. The journal''s scope reflects the wide application of quality of life assessment and research in the biological and social sciences. All original work is subject to peer review for originality, scientific quality and relevance to a broad readership. This is an official journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书