Barbed versus traditional sutures in primary total knee arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes and wound-related complications.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Hamed W Babtain, Abdalmalik T Malki, Awwab A Shahhatalsayed, Basmah S Alweal, Retal E Faidah, Anas M Alqarni, Loai A Alsulaimani, Abdulrahman H Albadri, Muath S Alqahtani, Dhafer S Almuffarh
{"title":"Barbed versus traditional sutures in primary total knee arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes and wound-related complications.","authors":"Hamed W Babtain, Abdalmalik T Malki, Awwab A Shahhatalsayed, Basmah S Alweal, Retal E Faidah, Anas M Alqarni, Loai A Alsulaimani, Abdulrahman H Albadri, Muath S Alqahtani, Dhafer S Almuffarh","doi":"10.1186/s13018-026-07036-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the widespread use of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the optimal wound closure technique remains clinically unresolved. Barbed sutures have been proposed as a knotless alternative to traditional sutures, with potential advantages in operative efficiency and wound closure; however, concerns remain regarding postoperative complications. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and postoperative complications associated with barbed versus traditional sutures in patients undergoing primary TKA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted using MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Embase from database inception through November 2025. Eligible studies were restricted to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving adults undergoing primary TKA that directly compared barbed with traditional (knotted) sutures and reported at least one predefined clinical or wound-related outcome. Primary outcomes included wound closure time, superficial wound infection, postoperative Knee Society Score (KSS), knee range of motion (ROM), and wound-related adverse events. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan version 5.3. The study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251128395) and received Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval from King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (Protocol No. NRJ25/044/8).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five randomized controlled trials involving 1035 patients mettheeligibilitycriteria. Barbed sutures appeared to be associated with shorter wound closure times (MD = - 5.39 min, 95% CI: - 9.89 to - 0.88; P = 0.02). However, substantial heterogeneity was observed across studies. Superficial wound infection was significantly more frequent with barbed sutures (OR = 2.33, 95% CI: 1.07-5.05; P = 0.03). No significant differences were observed in postoperative KSS at 6 weeks and 3 months (MD = 0.42, 95% CI: - 0.88 to 1.72; P = 0.53).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Barbed sutures may reduce wound closure time during TKA but are associated with a higher risk of superficial wound infection. No significant differences were observed in early functional outcomes, and further high-quality studies are needed to clarify long-term safety and efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13711860/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-026-07036-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the widespread use of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the optimal wound closure technique remains clinically unresolved. Barbed sutures have been proposed as a knotless alternative to traditional sutures, with potential advantages in operative efficiency and wound closure; however, concerns remain regarding postoperative complications. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and postoperative complications associated with barbed versus traditional sutures in patients undergoing primary TKA.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Embase from database inception through November 2025. Eligible studies were restricted to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving adults undergoing primary TKA that directly compared barbed with traditional (knotted) sutures and reported at least one predefined clinical or wound-related outcome. Primary outcomes included wound closure time, superficial wound infection, postoperative Knee Society Score (KSS), knee range of motion (ROM), and wound-related adverse events. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan version 5.3. The study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251128395) and received Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval from King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (Protocol No. NRJ25/044/8).

Results: Five randomized controlled trials involving 1035 patients mettheeligibilitycriteria. Barbed sutures appeared to be associated with shorter wound closure times (MD = - 5.39 min, 95% CI: - 9.89 to - 0.88; P = 0.02). However, substantial heterogeneity was observed across studies. Superficial wound infection was significantly more frequent with barbed sutures (OR = 2.33, 95% CI: 1.07-5.05; P = 0.03). No significant differences were observed in postoperative KSS at 6 weeks and 3 months (MD = 0.42, 95% CI: - 0.88 to 1.72; P = 0.53).

Conclusion: Barbed sutures may reduce wound closure time during TKA but are associated with a higher risk of superficial wound infection. No significant differences were observed in early functional outcomes, and further high-quality studies are needed to clarify long-term safety and efficacy.

初次全膝关节置换术中倒刺缝合线与传统缝合线的比较:临床结果和伤口相关并发症的系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:尽管全膝关节置换术(TKA)被广泛使用,但最佳的伤口闭合技术在临床上仍未得到解决。倒钩缝线被认为是传统缝线的一种无结替代方法,在手术效率和伤口闭合方面具有潜在的优势;然而,术后并发症仍然值得关注。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在比较原发性TKA患者采用倒钩缝合与传统缝合的临床结果和术后并发症。方法:使用MEDLINE/PubMed、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Central)、ScienceDirect、Scopus和Embase从数据库建立到2025年11月进行全面的文献检索。符合条件的研究仅限于随机对照试验(RCTs),涉及接受原发性TKA的成人,直接比较有刺缝合和传统(打结)缝合,并报告至少一个预先确定的临床或伤口相关结果。主要结局包括伤口愈合时间、浅表伤口感染、术后膝关节社会评分(KSS)、膝关节活动度(ROM)和伤口相关不良事件。meta分析采用RevMan 5.3版本。该研究已在PROSPERO注册(CRD420251128395),并获得了阿卜杜拉国王国际医学研究中心的机构审查委员会(IRB)批准。NRJ25/044/8)。结果:纳入1035例患者的5项随机对照试验符合入选标准。有刺缝线似乎与较短的伤口关闭时间相关(MD = - 5.39 min, 95% CI: - 9.89至- 0.88;P = 0.02)。然而,在研究中观察到大量的异质性。有刺缝线组浅表伤口感染发生率明显高于无刺缝线组(OR = 2.33, 95% CI: 1.07-5.05; P = 0.03)。术后6周和3个月的KSS无显著差异(MD = 0.42, 95% CI: - 0.88 ~ 1.72; P = 0.53)。结论:有刺缝线可缩短TKA术中伤口的闭合时间,但有较高的创面感染风险。早期功能结果未观察到显著差异,需要进一步的高质量研究来阐明长期安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书