{"title":"Integrated botanical and cultural strategies for management of major insect pests in maize.","authors":"Kassahun Yimenu Abera, Getnet Atenafu Abate, Melkamsew Berihun Geremew","doi":"10.1093/jisesa/ieag060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Maize (Zea mays L.) is a staple crop for millions of people worldwide, yet its productivity is constantly under threat from pests such as fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda J.E. Smith), stem borers (Busseola fusca Fuller and Chilo partellus Swinhoe), maize aphids (Rhopalosiphum maidis Fitch), and maize weevil (Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky). These pests can cause devastating losses of 20-50% in the field and up to 40% during storage. The pests are increasingly resistant to chemical insecticides, and there are growing concerns about environmental and health impacts. Sustainable alternatives are urgently needed. This review brings together insights from 34 studies (2000-2025) on plant-based insecticides, cultural practices, and their integration for maize pest management. Across the selected studies, larval mortality due to botanical extracts ranged from 45% to 92%, depending on the plant species used, formulation, and target pest. These values reflect the range reported in different studies rather than results from a formal meta-analysis. Cultural practices like intercropping, crop rotation, adjusting planting dates, and field sanitation lowered pest pressure by 18-80% and boosted yields by 8-45%. Combining these approaches was even more powerful, reducing fall armyworm damage by 65-88%, increasing yields up to 52%, and supporting beneficial insects. Despite these successes, challenges remain, especially in understanding how farmers adopt these methods and how they perform across different locations and seasons. Overall, this evidence shows that integrated, environmentally friendly strategies can protect maize, support farmers, and promote resilient, low-input farming systems. Future work should focus on long-term field trials, practical adoption, and socio-economic benefits to make these strategies widely accessible. A systematic literature search was conducted using databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar covering studies published between 2000 and 2025.</p>","PeriodicalId":16156,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Insect Science","volume":"26 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13310038/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Insect Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/ieag060","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Maize (Zea mays L.) is a staple crop for millions of people worldwide, yet its productivity is constantly under threat from pests such as fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda J.E. Smith), stem borers (Busseola fusca Fuller and Chilo partellus Swinhoe), maize aphids (Rhopalosiphum maidis Fitch), and maize weevil (Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky). These pests can cause devastating losses of 20-50% in the field and up to 40% during storage. The pests are increasingly resistant to chemical insecticides, and there are growing concerns about environmental and health impacts. Sustainable alternatives are urgently needed. This review brings together insights from 34 studies (2000-2025) on plant-based insecticides, cultural practices, and their integration for maize pest management. Across the selected studies, larval mortality due to botanical extracts ranged from 45% to 92%, depending on the plant species used, formulation, and target pest. These values reflect the range reported in different studies rather than results from a formal meta-analysis. Cultural practices like intercropping, crop rotation, adjusting planting dates, and field sanitation lowered pest pressure by 18-80% and boosted yields by 8-45%. Combining these approaches was even more powerful, reducing fall armyworm damage by 65-88%, increasing yields up to 52%, and supporting beneficial insects. Despite these successes, challenges remain, especially in understanding how farmers adopt these methods and how they perform across different locations and seasons. Overall, this evidence shows that integrated, environmentally friendly strategies can protect maize, support farmers, and promote resilient, low-input farming systems. Future work should focus on long-term field trials, practical adoption, and socio-economic benefits to make these strategies widely accessible. A systematic literature search was conducted using databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar covering studies published between 2000 and 2025.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Insect Science was founded with support from the University of Arizona library in 2001 by Dr. Henry Hagedorn, who served as editor-in-chief until his death in January 2014. The Entomological Society of America was very pleased to add the Journal of Insect Science to its publishing portfolio in 2014. The fully open access journal publishes papers in all aspects of the biology of insects and other arthropods from the molecular to the ecological, and their agricultural and medical impact.