Integrated botanical and cultural strategies for management of major insect pests in maize.

IF 2.3 3区 农林科学 Q1 ENTOMOLOGY
Kassahun Yimenu Abera, Getnet Atenafu Abate, Melkamsew Berihun Geremew
{"title":"Integrated botanical and cultural strategies for management of major insect pests in maize.","authors":"Kassahun Yimenu Abera, Getnet Atenafu Abate, Melkamsew Berihun Geremew","doi":"10.1093/jisesa/ieag060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Maize (Zea mays L.) is a staple crop for millions of people worldwide, yet its productivity is constantly under threat from pests such as fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda J.E. Smith), stem borers (Busseola fusca Fuller and Chilo partellus Swinhoe), maize aphids (Rhopalosiphum maidis Fitch), and maize weevil (Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky). These pests can cause devastating losses of 20-50% in the field and up to 40% during storage. The pests are increasingly resistant to chemical insecticides, and there are growing concerns about environmental and health impacts. Sustainable alternatives are urgently needed. This review brings together insights from 34 studies (2000-2025) on plant-based insecticides, cultural practices, and their integration for maize pest management. Across the selected studies, larval mortality due to botanical extracts ranged from 45% to 92%, depending on the plant species used, formulation, and target pest. These values reflect the range reported in different studies rather than results from a formal meta-analysis. Cultural practices like intercropping, crop rotation, adjusting planting dates, and field sanitation lowered pest pressure by 18-80% and boosted yields by 8-45%. Combining these approaches was even more powerful, reducing fall armyworm damage by 65-88%, increasing yields up to 52%, and supporting beneficial insects. Despite these successes, challenges remain, especially in understanding how farmers adopt these methods and how they perform across different locations and seasons. Overall, this evidence shows that integrated, environmentally friendly strategies can protect maize, support farmers, and promote resilient, low-input farming systems. Future work should focus on long-term field trials, practical adoption, and socio-economic benefits to make these strategies widely accessible. A systematic literature search was conducted using databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar covering studies published between 2000 and 2025.</p>","PeriodicalId":16156,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Insect Science","volume":"26 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13310038/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Insect Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/ieag060","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Maize (Zea mays L.) is a staple crop for millions of people worldwide, yet its productivity is constantly under threat from pests such as fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda J.E. Smith), stem borers (Busseola fusca Fuller and Chilo partellus Swinhoe), maize aphids (Rhopalosiphum maidis Fitch), and maize weevil (Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky). These pests can cause devastating losses of 20-50% in the field and up to 40% during storage. The pests are increasingly resistant to chemical insecticides, and there are growing concerns about environmental and health impacts. Sustainable alternatives are urgently needed. This review brings together insights from 34 studies (2000-2025) on plant-based insecticides, cultural practices, and their integration for maize pest management. Across the selected studies, larval mortality due to botanical extracts ranged from 45% to 92%, depending on the plant species used, formulation, and target pest. These values reflect the range reported in different studies rather than results from a formal meta-analysis. Cultural practices like intercropping, crop rotation, adjusting planting dates, and field sanitation lowered pest pressure by 18-80% and boosted yields by 8-45%. Combining these approaches was even more powerful, reducing fall armyworm damage by 65-88%, increasing yields up to 52%, and supporting beneficial insects. Despite these successes, challenges remain, especially in understanding how farmers adopt these methods and how they perform across different locations and seasons. Overall, this evidence shows that integrated, environmentally friendly strategies can protect maize, support farmers, and promote resilient, low-input farming systems. Future work should focus on long-term field trials, practical adoption, and socio-economic benefits to make these strategies widely accessible. A systematic literature search was conducted using databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar covering studies published between 2000 and 2025.

玉米主要害虫的植物与栽培综合治理策略。
玉米(Zea mays L.)是全世界数百万人的主要作物,但其生产力不断受到害虫的威胁,如秋粘虫(Spodoptera frugiperda J.E. Smith)、茎螟虫(Busseola fusca Fuller和Chilo partellus Swinhoe)、玉米蚜虫(Rhopalosiphum maidis Fitch)和玉米象鼻虫(Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky)。这些害虫在田间可造成20-50%的毁灭性损失,在储存期间可造成高达40%的损失。害虫对化学杀虫剂的抵抗力越来越强,对环境和健康的影响也越来越令人担忧。我们迫切需要可持续的替代品。本综述汇集了来自34项研究(2000-2025年)的见解,这些研究涉及植物基杀虫剂、栽培做法及其在玉米病虫害管理中的整合。在选定的研究中,植物提取物造成的幼虫死亡率从45%到92%不等,这取决于所使用的植物种类、配方和目标害虫。这些值反映了不同研究报告的范围,而不是正式荟萃分析的结果。间作、轮作、调整种植日期和田间卫生等文化做法使病虫害压力降低了18-80%,并使产量提高了8-45%。结合这些方法效果更好,减少了65-88%的秋粘虫危害,提高了52%的产量,并支持了有益的昆虫。尽管取得了这些成功,但挑战依然存在,特别是在了解农民如何采用这些方法以及他们在不同地点和季节的表现方面。总体而言,这一证据表明,综合的环境友好型战略可以保护玉米,支持农民,并促进有弹性的低投入农业系统。未来的工作应侧重于长期的实地试验、实际采用和社会经济效益,以使这些战略得到广泛利用。使用Scopus、Web of Science和谷歌Scholar等数据库进行了系统的文献检索,涵盖了2000年至2025年间发表的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Insect Science
Journal of Insect Science 生物-昆虫学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Insect Science was founded with support from the University of Arizona library in 2001 by Dr. Henry Hagedorn, who served as editor-in-chief until his death in January 2014. The Entomological Society of America was very pleased to add the Journal of Insect Science to its publishing portfolio in 2014. The fully open access journal publishes papers in all aspects of the biology of insects and other arthropods from the molecular to the ecological, and their agricultural and medical impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书