A new generic feline quality of life (FelQoL) questionnaire: part 1 - development and validation.

IF 2.6 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-26 DOI:10.1177/1098612X261448700
Luca Albergante, Anna Harding, Tammie King, Tanya Schoeman, Emily Blackwell, Nathaniel Spofford, Nicole Einerson, Ellie Davey, Janet Patterson-Kane, Luisa De Risio
{"title":"A new generic feline quality of life (FelQoL) questionnaire: part 1 - development and validation.","authors":"Luca Albergante, Anna Harding, Tammie King, Tanya Schoeman, Emily Blackwell, Nathaniel Spofford, Nicole Einerson, Ellie Davey, Janet Patterson-Kane, Luisa De Risio","doi":"10.1177/1098612X261448700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesThe central aim of this study was to develop a questionnaire that can be used to assess the combined emotional and physical wellbeing of pet cats - that is, to evaluate their quality of life (QoL). Using answers to this questionnaire, we then aimed to develop a statistically validated and robust algorithm (an instrument) to derive a set of reproducible QoL dimensions for evaluating and comparing the wellbeing of cats.MethodsResponses from 1324 cat owners in the USA and UK were collected and used to identify key cat QoL dimensions using well-established approaches. Statistical analysis was used to evaluate the extent to which our algorithm produced comparable results when used across different populations of cats (validity and robustness). Furthermore, data from 385 cats were collected again after 2 weeks to evaluate the extent to which scores of the QoL dimensions varied over time (reliability).ResultsA data-driven analysis was used to develop an instrument with seven QoL dimensions across daytime and mealtime behaviours: Active, Talkative, Satisfied, Relaxed, Mobile, Appetite and Sociable. Statistical analysis confirmed the robustness, validity and reliability of the instrument.Conclusions and relevanceThe Feline Quality of Life questionnaire and its associated instrument evaluated cat QoL across seven dimensions and allowed exploration of wellbeing across different cat demographics and health conditions. The questionnaire can be used by pet owners interested in better understanding the wellbeing of their cat and by veterinary professionals to gather information that complements in-clinic health assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":15851,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery","volume":"28 6","pages":"1098612X261448700"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13309661/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612X261448700","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectivesThe central aim of this study was to develop a questionnaire that can be used to assess the combined emotional and physical wellbeing of pet cats - that is, to evaluate their quality of life (QoL). Using answers to this questionnaire, we then aimed to develop a statistically validated and robust algorithm (an instrument) to derive a set of reproducible QoL dimensions for evaluating and comparing the wellbeing of cats.MethodsResponses from 1324 cat owners in the USA and UK were collected and used to identify key cat QoL dimensions using well-established approaches. Statistical analysis was used to evaluate the extent to which our algorithm produced comparable results when used across different populations of cats (validity and robustness). Furthermore, data from 385 cats were collected again after 2 weeks to evaluate the extent to which scores of the QoL dimensions varied over time (reliability).ResultsA data-driven analysis was used to develop an instrument with seven QoL dimensions across daytime and mealtime behaviours: Active, Talkative, Satisfied, Relaxed, Mobile, Appetite and Sociable. Statistical analysis confirmed the robustness, validity and reliability of the instrument.Conclusions and relevanceThe Feline Quality of Life questionnaire and its associated instrument evaluated cat QoL across seven dimensions and allowed exploration of wellbeing across different cat demographics and health conditions. The questionnaire can be used by pet owners interested in better understanding the wellbeing of their cat and by veterinary professionals to gather information that complements in-clinic health assessments.

一种新的通用猫科动物生活质量(FelQoL)问卷:第一部分-开发和验证。
本研究的中心目的是开发一份问卷,可用于评估宠物猫的情感和身体健康,即评估它们的生活质量(QoL)。利用该问卷的答案,我们旨在开发一种经过统计验证且稳健的算法(一种工具),以获得一组可重复的生活质量维度,用于评估和比较猫的健康状况。方法收集美国和英国1324名猫主人的反馈,并使用完善的方法确定猫的主要生活质量维度。统计分析用于评估我们的算法在不同猫种群中产生可比性结果的程度(有效性和稳健性)。此外,两周后再次收集385只猫的数据,以评估生活质量维度得分随时间变化的程度(可靠性)。结果采用数据驱动分析开发了一种涵盖白天和用餐行为的七个生活质量维度的工具:活跃、健谈、满意、放松、移动、食欲和社交。统计分析证实了仪器的稳健性、有效性和可靠性。猫生活质量问卷及其相关工具从七个维度评估猫的生活质量,并允许探索不同猫人口统计和健康状况的健康状况。有兴趣更好地了解他们的猫的健康状况的宠物主人和兽医专业人员可以使用调查问卷来收集信息,以补充门诊健康评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
17.60%
发文量
254
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: JFMS is an international, peer-reviewed journal aimed at both practitioners and researchers with an interest in the clinical veterinary healthcare of domestic cats. The journal is published monthly in two formats: ‘Classic’ editions containing high-quality original papers on all aspects of feline medicine and surgery, including basic research relevant to clinical practice; and dedicated ‘Clinical Practice’ editions primarily containing opinionated review articles providing state-of-the-art information for feline clinicians, along with other relevant articles such as consensus guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书