A potential survival benefit in coronary artery bypass grafting with micro-axial temporary pump recovery in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Anjeli Reyes Macaranas, Naoki Tadokoro, George T Tolis, Sary F Aranki, Asishana A Osho, Thoralf M Sundt, Eriberto Michel, David A D'Alessandro, Akinobu Itoh
{"title":"A potential survival benefit in coronary artery bypass grafting with micro-axial temporary pump recovery in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction.","authors":"Anjeli Reyes Macaranas, Naoki Tadokoro, George T Tolis, Sary F Aranki, Asishana A Osho, Thoralf M Sundt, Eriberto Michel, David A D'Alessandro, Akinobu Itoh","doi":"10.1007/s10047-026-01564-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with temporary micro-axial ventricular assist device (Impella, Johnson and Johnson, Danvers, MA, USA) for peri-operative recovery has been utilized among patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We hypothesized that Impella recovery CABG would be associated with increased two-year survival, compared to traditional intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) recovery CABG. 151 patients with low LVEF (≤ 25%) underwent on-pump CABG at our hospital system between July 2017 and March 2025. Patients who underwent CABG without mechanical assistance, had a cardiac arrest within 24 hours of CABG, prior organ transplantation, or chronic dialysis were excluded. Propensity score analysis matched patients with Impella recovery (n = 19) and IABP recovery CABG (n = 19), and Kaplan-Meier analysis compared two-year survival between these groups. Patients who received Impella recovery CABG had significantly greater two-year survival at 100% compared to the IABP group at 60.5% (95% CI 39.9-91.7%) (log-rank p = 0.01). Impella recovery was associated with greater aortic cross clamp (p = 0.02) and cardiopulmonary bypass (p < 0.001) times and longer ICU stays (p = 0.008). There were no significant differences in major postoperative complications, including re-exploration for bleeding, stroke, and renal failure. Our exploratory study found that Impella recovery CABG was associated with decreased mortality compared to IABP recovery among patients with reduced LVEF. Larger cohorts with longer follow-up are necessary to assess whether this advanced mechanical support method confers a meaningful survival benefit in this high-risk patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":15177,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Artificial Organs","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Artificial Organs","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-026-01564-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with temporary micro-axial ventricular assist device (Impella, Johnson and Johnson, Danvers, MA, USA) for peri-operative recovery has been utilized among patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We hypothesized that Impella recovery CABG would be associated with increased two-year survival, compared to traditional intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) recovery CABG. 151 patients with low LVEF (≤ 25%) underwent on-pump CABG at our hospital system between July 2017 and March 2025. Patients who underwent CABG without mechanical assistance, had a cardiac arrest within 24 hours of CABG, prior organ transplantation, or chronic dialysis were excluded. Propensity score analysis matched patients with Impella recovery (n = 19) and IABP recovery CABG (n = 19), and Kaplan-Meier analysis compared two-year survival between these groups. Patients who received Impella recovery CABG had significantly greater two-year survival at 100% compared to the IABP group at 60.5% (95% CI 39.9-91.7%) (log-rank p = 0.01). Impella recovery was associated with greater aortic cross clamp (p = 0.02) and cardiopulmonary bypass (p < 0.001) times and longer ICU stays (p = 0.008). There were no significant differences in major postoperative complications, including re-exploration for bleeding, stroke, and renal failure. Our exploratory study found that Impella recovery CABG was associated with decreased mortality compared to IABP recovery among patients with reduced LVEF. Larger cohorts with longer follow-up are necessary to assess whether this advanced mechanical support method confers a meaningful survival benefit in this high-risk patient population.

左心室射血分数降低患者冠状动脉旁路移植微轴暂时性泵恢复的潜在生存益处
冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)联合临时微轴心室辅助装置(Impella, Johnson and Johnson, Danvers, MA, USA)用于左心室射血分数(LVEF)降低的患者围手术期恢复。我们假设与传统的主动脉内球囊泵(IABP)恢复CABG相比,Impella恢复CABG将增加两年生存率。2017年7月至2025年3月,151例低LVEF(≤25%)患者在我院系统接受了无泵搭桥治疗。排除无机械辅助的冠脉搭桥患者、冠脉搭桥后24小时内心脏骤停患者、既往器官移植患者或慢性透析患者。倾向评分分析匹配Impella恢复(n = 19)和IABP恢复CABG (n = 19)患者,Kaplan-Meier分析比较两组患者的两年生存率。相比IABP组的60.5% (95% CI 39.9-91.7%) (log-rank p = 0.01),接受Impella恢复性CABG的患者的两年生存率明显更高,为100%。大主动脉交叉夹紧术(p = 0.02)和体外循环术(p = 0.05)与脉搏恢复相关
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Artificial Organs
Journal of Artificial Organs 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Artificial Organs is to introduce to colleagues worldwide a broad spectrum of important new achievements in the field of artificial organs, ranging from fundamental research to clinical applications. The scope of the Journal of Artificial Organs encompasses but is not restricted to blood purification, cardiovascular intervention, biomaterials, and artificial metabolic organs. Additionally, the journal will cover technical and industrial innovations. Membership in the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs is not a prerequisite for submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书