Perceived Versus Demonstrated Oncofertility Knowledge Among Oncology Providers.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Anjani D Kapadia, Sang Mee Lee, Lindsay F Schwartz
{"title":"Perceived Versus Demonstrated Oncofertility Knowledge Among Oncology Providers.","authors":"Anjani D Kapadia, Sang Mee Lee, Lindsay F Schwartz","doi":"10.1177/21565333261464968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer are at risk for treatment-related infertility, yet gaps in fertility preservation (FP) counseling persist. While patient-level barriers are well described, provider-level factors remain understudied. We evaluated oncology providers' perceived versus demonstrated knowledge of FP guidelines and identified barriers to oncofertility care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional survey of oncology providers at a single academic medical center caring for postpubertal AYA patients receiving gonadotoxic therapy. The survey assessed demographics, prior FP training, counseling and referral practices, and perceived barriers. Participants self-rated their FP knowledge and completed guideline-based clinical vignettes to assess demonstrated knowledge, enabling direct comparison of perceived versus demonstrated knowledge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Providers reported limited formal oncofertility training, with most rating prior education as fair or poor. Knowledge varied across FP strategies, with high familiarity for ovarian suppression and sperm cryopreservation and lower familiarity for ovarian transposition and male-directed surgical techniques. A trend toward discordance between perceived and demonstrated knowledge was observed but was not statistically significant. Awareness of institutional FP resources and referral pathways was limited. Providers most frequently cited patient-level barriers, including treatment urgency and cost, although provider- and system-level barriers were also reported.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Oncology providers may overestimate oncofertility knowledge, contributing to inconsistent counseling and missed opportunities for FP. This pattern, combined with gaps in training and awareness of institutional protocols, highlights the need for competency-based education, clearer institutional communication, and improved referral systems. Objective assessments may better identify knowledge gaps and guide targeted interventions to support guideline-concordant FP care.</p>","PeriodicalId":14769,"journal":{"name":"Journal of adolescent and young adult oncology","volume":" ","pages":"21565333261464968"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13601967/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of adolescent and young adult oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21565333261464968","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer are at risk for treatment-related infertility, yet gaps in fertility preservation (FP) counseling persist. While patient-level barriers are well described, provider-level factors remain understudied. We evaluated oncology providers' perceived versus demonstrated knowledge of FP guidelines and identified barriers to oncofertility care.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of oncology providers at a single academic medical center caring for postpubertal AYA patients receiving gonadotoxic therapy. The survey assessed demographics, prior FP training, counseling and referral practices, and perceived barriers. Participants self-rated their FP knowledge and completed guideline-based clinical vignettes to assess demonstrated knowledge, enabling direct comparison of perceived versus demonstrated knowledge.

Results: Providers reported limited formal oncofertility training, with most rating prior education as fair or poor. Knowledge varied across FP strategies, with high familiarity for ovarian suppression and sperm cryopreservation and lower familiarity for ovarian transposition and male-directed surgical techniques. A trend toward discordance between perceived and demonstrated knowledge was observed but was not statistically significant. Awareness of institutional FP resources and referral pathways was limited. Providers most frequently cited patient-level barriers, including treatment urgency and cost, although provider- and system-level barriers were also reported.

Discussion: Oncology providers may overestimate oncofertility knowledge, contributing to inconsistent counseling and missed opportunities for FP. This pattern, combined with gaps in training and awareness of institutional protocols, highlights the need for competency-based education, clearer institutional communication, and improved referral systems. Objective assessments may better identify knowledge gaps and guide targeted interventions to support guideline-concordant FP care.

肿瘤提供者的感知与实际的肿瘤生育知识。
目的:患有癌症的青少年和青壮年(AYAs)有治疗相关不孕的风险,但在生育保留(FP)咨询方面的差距仍然存在。虽然患者层面的障碍被很好地描述,但提供者层面的因素仍未得到充分研究。我们评估了肿瘤学提供者对计划生育指南的认知与实际知识,并确定了肿瘤生育护理的障碍。方法:我们在一个单一的学术医疗中心对接受性腺毒素治疗的青春期后AYA患者的肿瘤学提供者进行了横断面调查。该调查评估了人口统计、先前的计划生育培训、咨询和转诊实践以及感知到的障碍。参与者自我评估他们的计划生育知识,并完成基于指南的临床小短文来评估展示的知识,从而能够直接比较感知到的知识和展示的知识。结果:提供者报告了有限的正规的肿瘤生育培训,大多数人认为之前的教育是公平的或差的。对计划生育策略的了解各不相同,对卵巢抑制和精子冷冻保存的熟悉程度较高,对卵巢转位和男性指导的手术技术的熟悉程度较低。观察到认知知识和实际知识之间存在不一致的趋势,但没有统计学意义。对计划生育机构资源和转诊途径的认识有限。尽管提供者和系统层面的障碍也有报道,但提供者最常提到的是患者层面的障碍,包括治疗紧迫性和成本。讨论:肿瘤学提供者可能高估了肿瘤生育知识,导致咨询不一致,错失了计划生育的机会。这种模式,再加上培训和对机构规程的认识方面的差距,突出了以能力为基础的教育、更明确的机构沟通和改进转诊制度的必要性。客观评估可以更好地识别知识差距,并指导有针对性的干预措施,以支持符合指南的计划生育护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
15.00%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: Journal of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology (JAYAO) breaks new ground as the first cancer journal dedicated to all aspects of adolescent and young adult (AYA)-aged cancer patients and survivors. JAYAO is the only central forum for peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and research in the field, bringing together all AYA oncology stakeholders and professionals across disciplines, including clinicians, researchers, psychosocial and supportive care providers, and pediatric and adult cancer institutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书