Bridging Gaps in Perinatal Mental Health: A Review of Peer and Non-specialist Supports for Racially, Ethnically and Culturally Diverse Communities in the U.S.

IF 7.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Antonella Onofrietti Magrassi, Anahí Collado, Laurel M Hicks, Samuel Hubley, Desiree Bauer, Sona Dimidjian
{"title":"Bridging Gaps in Perinatal Mental Health: A Review of Peer and Non-specialist Supports for Racially, Ethnically and Culturally Diverse Communities in the U.S.","authors":"Antonella Onofrietti Magrassi, Anahí Collado, Laurel M Hicks, Samuel Hubley, Desiree Bauer, Sona Dimidjian","doi":"10.1007/s11920-026-01692-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This narrative review synthesizes findings from U.S.-based peer-reviewed studies published between January 2020 and May 2025 on peer and non-specialist delivered perinatal mental health support programs for racially, ethnically and culturally diverse populations.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Eight quantitative studies demonstrated improvements in depression, anxiety, and parenting outcomes through mechanisms including behavioral activation, cognitive behavior therapy, increased social support, and self-efficacy. Structured peer and non-specialist delivered programs, emphasized social support and culturally resonant approaches, with higher session \"dose\" linked to grater improvement in mental health outcomes. Trauma-informed models and multi-component interventions integrating culturally adapted cognitive behavior therapy and navigation also reported positive outcomes. Qualitative findings reinforced these mechanisms, with participants highlighting the importance of cultural resonance, trust, and emotional connection. However, no studies conducted formal mediation analyses. Peer‑ and non‑specialist‑delivered perinatal mental health supports show promise in improving outcomes among racially, ethnically, and culturally diverse populations in the U.S. These models draw on behavioral, psychosocial, and relational approaches, however more research is needed to establish effectiveness, guide dissemination, and identify mechanisms of change. Implementation science is critical for advancing scalable models of training and supervision, while policy innovation is needed to create sustainable funding and reimbursement pathways to embed these roles into routine perinatal care. Future efforts should intentionally employ participatory research approaches, ensure cultural relevance, and strengthen partnerships with community‑based organizations to support implementation and maximize equity, feasibility and acceptability.</p>","PeriodicalId":11057,"journal":{"name":"Current Psychiatry Reports","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13309475/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Psychiatry Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-026-01692-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: This narrative review synthesizes findings from U.S.-based peer-reviewed studies published between January 2020 and May 2025 on peer and non-specialist delivered perinatal mental health support programs for racially, ethnically and culturally diverse populations.

Recent findings: Eight quantitative studies demonstrated improvements in depression, anxiety, and parenting outcomes through mechanisms including behavioral activation, cognitive behavior therapy, increased social support, and self-efficacy. Structured peer and non-specialist delivered programs, emphasized social support and culturally resonant approaches, with higher session "dose" linked to grater improvement in mental health outcomes. Trauma-informed models and multi-component interventions integrating culturally adapted cognitive behavior therapy and navigation also reported positive outcomes. Qualitative findings reinforced these mechanisms, with participants highlighting the importance of cultural resonance, trust, and emotional connection. However, no studies conducted formal mediation analyses. Peer‑ and non‑specialist‑delivered perinatal mental health supports show promise in improving outcomes among racially, ethnically, and culturally diverse populations in the U.S. These models draw on behavioral, psychosocial, and relational approaches, however more research is needed to establish effectiveness, guide dissemination, and identify mechanisms of change. Implementation science is critical for advancing scalable models of training and supervision, while policy innovation is needed to create sustainable funding and reimbursement pathways to embed these roles into routine perinatal care. Future efforts should intentionally employ participatory research approaches, ensure cultural relevance, and strengthen partnerships with community‑based organizations to support implementation and maximize equity, feasibility and acceptability.

弥合围产儿心理健康的差距:对美国种族、民族和文化多元化社区的同伴和非专家支持的回顾
综述目的:本叙述性综述综合了2020年1月至2025年5月期间发表的美国同行评议研究的结果,这些研究是针对不同种族、民族和文化人群的同行和非专家提供的围产期心理健康支持项目。最新发现:8项定量研究表明,通过行为激活、认知行为治疗、增加社会支持和自我效能等机制,抑郁、焦虑和育儿结果得到改善。结构化的同伴和非专业人员提供的方案,强调社会支持和文化共鸣的方法,更高的会议“剂量”与心理健康结果的更大改善有关。创伤知情模型和整合文化适应性认知行为疗法和导航的多成分干预也报告了积极的结果。定性研究结果强化了这些机制,参与者强调了文化共鸣、信任和情感联系的重要性。然而,没有研究进行正式的调解分析。同伴和非专业人员提供的围产期心理健康支持有望改善美国不同种族、民族和文化人群的结果。这些模式借鉴了行为、社会心理和关系方法,但需要更多的研究来建立有效性、指导传播和确定变化机制。实施科学对于推进可扩展的培训和监督模式至关重要,同时需要政策创新来创建可持续的资金和报销途径,将这些作用纳入常规围产期护理。未来的努力应有意采用参与式研究方法,确保文化相关性,并加强与社区组织的伙伴关系,以支持实施并最大限度地提高公平性、可行性和可接受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
3.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal aims to review the most important, recently published research in psychiatry. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to serve all those involved in the care of those affected by psychiatric disorders. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as anxiety, medicopsychiatric disorders, and schizophrenia and other related psychotic disorders. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书