{"title":"Sustainability and waste reduction in clinical laboratories.","authors":"Adetoun A Ejilemele, Ila R Singh","doi":"10.1080/10408363.2026.2687509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hospitals are major generators of waste, producing an estimated 5.9 million tons of solid waste annually in the United States alone. This burden contributes to environmental pollution, rising operational costs, and downstream health impacts. While operating rooms, food services, and imaging departments have received increasing scrutiny as waste-intensive sectors, clinical laboratories, despite their high energy use, dependence on single-use plastics, and central role in every diagnostic decision, remain comparatively understudied in sustainability research. In this review, we argue that integrating environmental impact into laboratory practice represents the next evolution of quality in laboratory medicine. We propose a workflow-based framework to evaluate waste generation across the full testing continuum, including test ordering, specimen collection, transport, analysis, post-analytical practices, procurement, and accreditation. Drawing on current evidence, case studies, and emerging sustainability programs, we identify practical intervention points and critical knowledge gaps, including the lack of standardized environmental metrics such as waste-per-test, energy-per-test and water-per-test. By treating environmental performance as measurable, comparable and improvable, clinical laboratories can help lead healthcare's broader transition toward high-value, environmentally responsible care while maintaining diagnostic quality and patient-centered care.</p>","PeriodicalId":10760,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408363.2026.2687509","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Hospitals are major generators of waste, producing an estimated 5.9 million tons of solid waste annually in the United States alone. This burden contributes to environmental pollution, rising operational costs, and downstream health impacts. While operating rooms, food services, and imaging departments have received increasing scrutiny as waste-intensive sectors, clinical laboratories, despite their high energy use, dependence on single-use plastics, and central role in every diagnostic decision, remain comparatively understudied in sustainability research. In this review, we argue that integrating environmental impact into laboratory practice represents the next evolution of quality in laboratory medicine. We propose a workflow-based framework to evaluate waste generation across the full testing continuum, including test ordering, specimen collection, transport, analysis, post-analytical practices, procurement, and accreditation. Drawing on current evidence, case studies, and emerging sustainability programs, we identify practical intervention points and critical knowledge gaps, including the lack of standardized environmental metrics such as waste-per-test, energy-per-test and water-per-test. By treating environmental performance as measurable, comparable and improvable, clinical laboratories can help lead healthcare's broader transition toward high-value, environmentally responsible care while maintaining diagnostic quality and patient-centered care.
期刊介绍:
Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences publishes comprehensive and high quality review articles in all areas of clinical laboratory science, including clinical biochemistry, hematology, microbiology, pathology, transfusion medicine, genetics, immunology and molecular diagnostics. The reviews critically evaluate the status of current issues in the selected areas, with a focus on clinical laboratory diagnostics and latest advances. The adjective “critical” implies a balanced synthesis of results and conclusions that are frequently contradictory and controversial.