Educating for the end: A decade of death literacy interventions in U.S. health professions training.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Autumn Decker, Raven H Weaver, Cory Bolkan, Tracy Klein, Kathryn Bruzios
{"title":"Educating for the end: A decade of death literacy interventions in U.S. health professions training.","authors":"Autumn Decker, Raven H Weaver, Cory Bolkan, Tracy Klein, Kathryn Bruzios","doi":"10.1080/07481187.2026.2693535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most healthcare professionals in medicine, nursing, social work, counseling, and pharmacy receive little formal end-of-life education, and the extent of incorporating culturally informed death education into training remains unclear. This scoping review (N = 18) examined death literacy interventions in U.S.-based health professional education and identified which death literacy components (factual, practical, experiential, and community) were addressed. Most interventions targeted medical and nursing students; fewer than half incorporated cultural content, which varied considerably in depth and approach. Common intervention strategies included didactic learning, experiential activities, reflective writing, and peer/expert discussions. Factual death literacy was most frequently addressed; community death literacy was rarely represented. Most interventions were single-site and relied on quasi-experimental or qualitative designs, highlighting the early-stage and limited rigor of existing evidence. Greater attention to cultural context and community engagement may improve practitioners' readiness, competence, and emotional capacity to support dying individuals, their families, and their own response to death.</p>","PeriodicalId":11041,"journal":{"name":"Death Studies","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Death Studies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2026.2693535","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most healthcare professionals in medicine, nursing, social work, counseling, and pharmacy receive little formal end-of-life education, and the extent of incorporating culturally informed death education into training remains unclear. This scoping review (N = 18) examined death literacy interventions in U.S.-based health professional education and identified which death literacy components (factual, practical, experiential, and community) were addressed. Most interventions targeted medical and nursing students; fewer than half incorporated cultural content, which varied considerably in depth and approach. Common intervention strategies included didactic learning, experiential activities, reflective writing, and peer/expert discussions. Factual death literacy was most frequently addressed; community death literacy was rarely represented. Most interventions were single-site and relied on quasi-experimental or qualitative designs, highlighting the early-stage and limited rigor of existing evidence. Greater attention to cultural context and community engagement may improve practitioners' readiness, competence, and emotional capacity to support dying individuals, their families, and their own response to death.

为死亡而教育:美国卫生专业培训中的十年死亡扫盲干预。
医学、护理、社会工作、咨询和药学领域的大多数医疗保健专业人员几乎没有接受过正式的临终教育,将死亡文化教育纳入培训的程度仍不清楚。本范围综述(N = 18)检查了美国卫生专业教育中的死亡扫盲干预措施,并确定了死亡扫盲的组成部分(事实、实践、经验和社区)。大多数干预措施针对的是医学和护理专业的学生;只有不到一半包含了文化内容,这些内容在深度和方法上差异很大。常见的干预策略包括教学式学习、体验式活动、反思性写作和同伴/专家讨论。最常提到的是事实性死亡扫盲;社区死亡扫盲很少有代表。大多数干预措施是单点的,依赖于准实验或定性设计,突出了早期阶段和现有证据的有限严密性。更多地关注文化背景和社区参与可能会提高从业者的准备、能力和情感能力,以支持垂死的个人、他们的家庭和他们自己对死亡的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Death Studies
Death Studies Multiple-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
7.90%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: Now published ten times each year, this acclaimed journal provides refereed papers on significant research, scholarship, and practical approaches in the fast growing areas of bereavement and loss, grief therapy, death attitudes, suicide, and death education. It provides an international interdisciplinary forum in which a variety of professionals share results of research and practice, with the aim of better understanding the human encounter with death and assisting those who work with the dying and their families.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书