Jie Wang, Qinan Geng, Manman Wang, Mengmeng Yang, Yilan Zhang
{"title":"Dynamic nomogram for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer based on MRI analysis and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR).","authors":"Jie Wang, Qinan Geng, Manman Wang, Mengmeng Yang, Yilan Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s40644-026-01083-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to develop a dynamic nomogram in which clinical indicators are integrated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics to predict axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) in patients with breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our retrospective study included 221 pathologically confirmed patients with breast cancer. Radiomic features were extracted from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging (FS-T2WI) datasets. After feature screening, a support vector machine (SVM) algorithm was employed to establish radiomic models and calculate radiomic scores. Clinical independent predictors were identified through univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. A nomogram was established on the basis of the radiomic scores obtained with the optimal SVM model and clinically independent predictors, and it was subsequently transformed into a dynamic nomogram. Model performance was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve (AUC). Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) was applied to interpret the contribution of clinical predictors. Calibration and decision curves were employed to assess nomogram performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) classification, and ALN status on MRI were identified as independent predictors of ALNM (all p < 0.05). SHAP analysis identified PLR as the top contributor. The clinical model developed with the three predictors achieved AUCs of 0.845 and 0.706 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Among the SVM models, the DCE-MRI and FS-T2WI fusion sequence model outperformed the single-sequence models, with AUCs of 0.868 and 0.875, respectively, in the training and validation cohorts. When clinical predictors were incorporated into the fusion sequence model, the nomogram achieved AUC values of 0.930 and 0.928 in the training and validation cohorts. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that the nomogram has significant clinical value.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A nomogram model integrating MRI-derived radiomic scores, BI-RADS classification, ALN status, and PLR demonstrated good performance in predicting ALNM in patients with breast cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":9548,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13595517/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-026-01083-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to develop a dynamic nomogram in which clinical indicators are integrated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics to predict axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) in patients with breast cancer.
Methods: Our retrospective study included 221 pathologically confirmed patients with breast cancer. Radiomic features were extracted from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging (FS-T2WI) datasets. After feature screening, a support vector machine (SVM) algorithm was employed to establish radiomic models and calculate radiomic scores. Clinical independent predictors were identified through univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. A nomogram was established on the basis of the radiomic scores obtained with the optimal SVM model and clinically independent predictors, and it was subsequently transformed into a dynamic nomogram. Model performance was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve (AUC). Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) was applied to interpret the contribution of clinical predictors. Calibration and decision curves were employed to assess nomogram performance.
Results: The platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) classification, and ALN status on MRI were identified as independent predictors of ALNM (all p < 0.05). SHAP analysis identified PLR as the top contributor. The clinical model developed with the three predictors achieved AUCs of 0.845 and 0.706 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Among the SVM models, the DCE-MRI and FS-T2WI fusion sequence model outperformed the single-sequence models, with AUCs of 0.868 and 0.875, respectively, in the training and validation cohorts. When clinical predictors were incorporated into the fusion sequence model, the nomogram achieved AUC values of 0.930 and 0.928 in the training and validation cohorts. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that the nomogram has significant clinical value.
Conclusions: A nomogram model integrating MRI-derived radiomic scores, BI-RADS classification, ALN status, and PLR demonstrated good performance in predicting ALNM in patients with breast cancer.
Cancer ImagingONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍:
Cancer Imaging is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing original articles, reviews and editorials written by expert international radiologists working in oncology.
The journal encompasses CT, MR, PET, ultrasound, radionuclide and multimodal imaging in all kinds of malignant tumours, plus new developments, techniques and innovations. Topics of interest include:
Breast Imaging
Chest
Complications of treatment
Ear, Nose & Throat
Gastrointestinal
Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic
Imaging biomarkers
Interventional
Lymphoma
Measurement of tumour response
Molecular functional imaging
Musculoskeletal
Neuro oncology
Nuclear Medicine
Paediatric.