Perioperative Management of Patients Undergoing Periacetabular Osteotomy: An Evidence-Based Review.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Conor Dolson, Ira Zaltz, Alex L Gornitzky
{"title":"Perioperative Management of Patients Undergoing Periacetabular Osteotomy: An Evidence-Based Review.","authors":"Conor Dolson, Ira Zaltz, Alex L Gornitzky","doi":"10.1007/s12178-026-10049-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is an established and effective surgical treatment for symptomatic acetabular dysplasia in adolescents and young adults with healthy articular cartilage. While outcomes and technical surgical considerations are well described, perioperative management practices vary significantly across institutions. The purpose of this narrative review was to synthesize current literature on evidence-based best practices for perioperative management of patients undergoing PAO and to identify knowledge gaps for future investigation.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>A comprehensive review of the literature was performed focusing on perioperative care across four phases: preoperative, intraoperative, acute postoperative, and rehabilitation. Areas of emphasis included laboratory evaluation and nutritional optimization, mental health screening, patient education, blood loss mitigation strategies, pain control, venous thromboembolism and heterotopic ossification (HO) prophylaxis, and postoperative rehabilitation protocols. Strong evidence exists to support specific intraoperative practices such as tranexamic acid administration, controlled hypotension, and fascia iliacus blocks for pain control. Conversely, limited or heterogeneous evidence exists regarding preoperative laboratory testing, psychosocial interventions, standardized opioid prescribing, venous thromboembolism prophylaxis regimens, and rehabilitation protocols. Psychosocial health and preoperative educational interventions appear underutilized despite growing evidence of their impact on outcomes. Significant gaps remain, particularly regarding preoperative optimization and rehabilitation strategies. Continued high-quality research is needed to establish standardized, evidence-based perioperative care pathways to further improve outcomes following PAO.</p>","PeriodicalId":10950,"journal":{"name":"Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13309598/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-026-10049-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is an established and effective surgical treatment for symptomatic acetabular dysplasia in adolescents and young adults with healthy articular cartilage. While outcomes and technical surgical considerations are well described, perioperative management practices vary significantly across institutions. The purpose of this narrative review was to synthesize current literature on evidence-based best practices for perioperative management of patients undergoing PAO and to identify knowledge gaps for future investigation.

Recent findings: A comprehensive review of the literature was performed focusing on perioperative care across four phases: preoperative, intraoperative, acute postoperative, and rehabilitation. Areas of emphasis included laboratory evaluation and nutritional optimization, mental health screening, patient education, blood loss mitigation strategies, pain control, venous thromboembolism and heterotopic ossification (HO) prophylaxis, and postoperative rehabilitation protocols. Strong evidence exists to support specific intraoperative practices such as tranexamic acid administration, controlled hypotension, and fascia iliacus blocks for pain control. Conversely, limited or heterogeneous evidence exists regarding preoperative laboratory testing, psychosocial interventions, standardized opioid prescribing, venous thromboembolism prophylaxis regimens, and rehabilitation protocols. Psychosocial health and preoperative educational interventions appear underutilized despite growing evidence of their impact on outcomes. Significant gaps remain, particularly regarding preoperative optimization and rehabilitation strategies. Continued high-quality research is needed to establish standardized, evidence-based perioperative care pathways to further improve outcomes following PAO.

髋臼周围截骨术患者围手术期管理:循证回顾。
综述目的:髋臼周围截骨术(PAO)是一种成熟有效的手术治疗症状性髋臼发育不良的青少年和年轻成人健康的关节软骨。虽然结果和技术手术注意事项有很好的描述,但不同机构的围手术期管理实践差异很大。这篇叙述性综述的目的是综合目前关于PAO患者围手术期管理的循证最佳实践的文献,并为未来的研究确定知识空白。最近的发现:对围手术期护理的文献进行了全面的回顾,分为四个阶段:术前、术中、术后急性期和康复。重点领域包括实验室评估和营养优化、心理健康筛查、患者教育、减少失血策略、疼痛控制、静脉血栓栓塞和异位骨化(HO)预防以及术后康复方案。有强有力的证据支持特定的术中操作,如氨甲环酸给药、控制性低血压和髂筋膜阻滞来控制疼痛。相反,关于术前实验室检查、社会心理干预、标准化阿片类药物处方、静脉血栓栓塞预防方案和康复方案的证据有限或不一致。社会心理健康和术前教育干预措施似乎未得到充分利用,尽管越来越多的证据表明它们对结果有影响。仍然存在重大差距,特别是在术前优化和康复策略方面。需要持续的高质量研究来建立标准化的、以证据为基础的围手术期护理途径,以进一步改善PAO后的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: This journal intends to review the most significant recent developments in the field of musculoskeletal medicine. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by expert world-renowned authors, the journal aims to serve all those involved in the diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of musculoskeletal-related conditions. We accomplish this aim by appointing authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as rehabilitation of the knee and hip, sports medicine, trauma, pediatrics, health policy, customization in arthroplasty, and rheumatology. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. We also provide commentaries from well-known figures in the field, and an Editorial Board of more than 20 diverse members suggests topics of special interest to their country/region and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书