Optimizing office blood pressure thresholds to identify controlled ambulatory blood pressure in high-risk pregnancies with chronic hypertension.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Blood Pressure Monitoring Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-02 DOI:10.1097/MBP.0000000000000812
Walter Espeche, Julian Minetto, Gustavo Cerri, Juan Todoroff, Cecilia Betty Leiva Sisnieguez, Eduardo Balbin, Camilo Martinez, Carlos Enrique Leiva Sisnieguez, Martin Rogelio Salazar
{"title":"Optimizing office blood pressure thresholds to identify controlled ambulatory blood pressure in high-risk pregnancies with chronic hypertension.","authors":"Walter Espeche, Julian Minetto, Gustavo Cerri, Juan Todoroff, Cecilia Betty Leiva Sisnieguez, Eduardo Balbin, Camilo Martinez, Carlos Enrique Leiva Sisnieguez, Martin Rogelio Salazar","doi":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy remain a leading cause of maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality worldwide. In women with chronic hypertension, adequate 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (ABPM) control has been associated with a reduced risk of adverse outcomes, including preeclampsia. However, the ability of office blood pressure (BP) measurements to reliably identify women with controlled ABPM during pregnancy remains uncertain. We conducted a retrospective cohort study including pregnant women with chronic hypertension evaluated before 20 weeks of gestation at a high-risk pregnancy center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Office BP and 24-h ABPM were assessed using a standardized protocol at three gestational periods (14, 20, and 30 weeks). Controlled ABPM was defined by 24-h, daytime, and nighttime BP thresholds. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were performed to evaluate the discriminative ability of office systolic and diastolic BP to identify controlled ABPM and to explore potential cut-off values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 247 women with chronic hypertension, office BP demonstrated limited discriminatory performance across all gestational stages. Area under the curve values were consistently close to or below 0.5 for both systolic and diastolic BP, indicating poor classification ability. Cutoff values identified using the Youden index were clinically implausible and would have classified only a minimal proportion of women as having controlled ABPM. Even when clinically intuitive office BP thresholds were applied, sensitivity and specificity remained low. These findings indicate that office BP measurements cannot be considered a reliable surrogate for ABPM control in pregnant women with chronic hypertension.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Consequently, ABPM remains essential for accurate BP assessment and risk stratification, particularly during the second half of pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":8950,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":"222-229"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MBP.0000000000000812","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy remain a leading cause of maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality worldwide. In women with chronic hypertension, adequate 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (ABPM) control has been associated with a reduced risk of adverse outcomes, including preeclampsia. However, the ability of office blood pressure (BP) measurements to reliably identify women with controlled ABPM during pregnancy remains uncertain. We conducted a retrospective cohort study including pregnant women with chronic hypertension evaluated before 20 weeks of gestation at a high-risk pregnancy center.

Methods: Office BP and 24-h ABPM were assessed using a standardized protocol at three gestational periods (14, 20, and 30 weeks). Controlled ABPM was defined by 24-h, daytime, and nighttime BP thresholds. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were performed to evaluate the discriminative ability of office systolic and diastolic BP to identify controlled ABPM and to explore potential cut-off values.

Results: Among 247 women with chronic hypertension, office BP demonstrated limited discriminatory performance across all gestational stages. Area under the curve values were consistently close to or below 0.5 for both systolic and diastolic BP, indicating poor classification ability. Cutoff values identified using the Youden index were clinically implausible and would have classified only a minimal proportion of women as having controlled ABPM. Even when clinically intuitive office BP thresholds were applied, sensitivity and specificity remained low. These findings indicate that office BP measurements cannot be considered a reliable surrogate for ABPM control in pregnant women with chronic hypertension.

Conclusion: Consequently, ABPM remains essential for accurate BP assessment and risk stratification, particularly during the second half of pregnancy.

优化办公室血压阈值以确定高风险妊娠合并慢性高血压患者的可控动态血压。
背景:妊娠期高血压疾病仍然是全世界孕产妇和胎儿发病和死亡的主要原因。在患有慢性高血压的女性中,适当的24小时动态血压(ABPM)控制与降低不良后果的风险相关,包括先兆子痫。然而,办公室血压(BP)测量是否能够可靠地识别怀孕期间ABPM控制的女性仍不确定。我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,包括在高危妊娠中心评估妊娠20周前患有慢性高血压的孕妇。方法:采用标准化方案评估妊娠期(14、20和30周)的办公室血压和24小时ABPM。控制ABPM由24小时、白天和夜间血压阈值定义。通过受试者工作特征曲线分析来评估正常收缩压和舒张压的判别能力,以识别控制ABPM并探索潜在的临界值。结果:在247名慢性高血压妇女中,办公室血压在所有妊娠阶段表现出有限的歧视性表现。收缩压和舒张压曲线下面积值均接近或低于0.5,分类能力较差。使用约登指数确定的临界值在临床上是不可信的,并且只能将极小比例的女性分类为控制ABPM。即使应用临床直观的办公室血压阈值,敏感性和特异性仍然很低。这些发现表明,办公室血压测量不能被认为是慢性高血压孕妇ABPM控制的可靠替代。结论:因此,ABPM对于准确的血压评估和风险分层仍然至关重要,特别是在妊娠后半期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Blood Pressure Monitoring
Blood Pressure Monitoring 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
110
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Blood Pressure Monitoring is devoted to original research in blood pressure measurement and blood pressure variability. It includes device technology, analytical methodology of blood pressure over time and its variability, clinical trials - including, but not limited to, pharmacology - involving blood pressure monitoring, blood pressure reactivity, patient evaluation, and outcomes and effectiveness research. This innovative journal contains papers dealing with all aspects of manual, automated, and ambulatory monitoring. Basic and clinical science papers are considered although the emphasis is on clinical medicine. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书