Medical Student Reflections on a Prison Psychiatric Experience: A Qualitative Analysis.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Rachel Hianik, Katelyn Einloth, Paul Mihas, Theodore Zarzar
{"title":"Medical Student Reflections on a Prison Psychiatric Experience: A Qualitative Analysis.","authors":"Rachel Hianik, Katelyn Einloth, Paul Mihas, Theodore Zarzar","doi":"10.1007/s40596-026-02388-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Large numbers of people with psychiatric illness receive treatment in jails and prisons, yet the experience of medical learners in carceral settings is underexplored. This study analyzed medical student reflections following a carceral psychiatry rotation to understand students' pre-rotation beliefs and whether these ideas were changed by the clinical experience. The authors sought to understand whether the clinical experience motivated students or deterred them from pursuing work in carceral medicine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two independent coders reviewed deidentified student reflections (n = 19) from July 2022 to October 2025 and developed a codebook of themes using an inductive approach. Reflections were qualitatively coded in ATLAS.ti software using the agreed-upon codebook. Codes were revised as further themes emerged and discrepancies were resolved by consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five main categories were identified in student reflections: (1) preconceived notions; (2) perceptions of the prison environment; (3) perceptions of the people in prisons; (4) perceptions of the prison system; and (5) insights gained. Most students found that their clinical experience did not align with their preconceived beliefs, specifically concerning safety or the perceived aggressiveness of incarcerated people. Many recognized the shortcomings of the carceral system while simultaneously acknowledging the rewarding elements of their experience, including how many clinical interactions humanized incarcerated individuals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Students' preconceived notions were challenged most during direct student-patient interactions, suggesting that clinical rotations involving direct patient care may hold unique value as compared to lecture-based curricula about carceral health care. Ultimately, the elective led many students to consider working with incarcerated people in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":7069,"journal":{"name":"Academic Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-026-02388-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Large numbers of people with psychiatric illness receive treatment in jails and prisons, yet the experience of medical learners in carceral settings is underexplored. This study analyzed medical student reflections following a carceral psychiatry rotation to understand students' pre-rotation beliefs and whether these ideas were changed by the clinical experience. The authors sought to understand whether the clinical experience motivated students or deterred them from pursuing work in carceral medicine.

Methods: Two independent coders reviewed deidentified student reflections (n = 19) from July 2022 to October 2025 and developed a codebook of themes using an inductive approach. Reflections were qualitatively coded in ATLAS.ti software using the agreed-upon codebook. Codes were revised as further themes emerged and discrepancies were resolved by consensus.

Results: Five main categories were identified in student reflections: (1) preconceived notions; (2) perceptions of the prison environment; (3) perceptions of the people in prisons; (4) perceptions of the prison system; and (5) insights gained. Most students found that their clinical experience did not align with their preconceived beliefs, specifically concerning safety or the perceived aggressiveness of incarcerated people. Many recognized the shortcomings of the carceral system while simultaneously acknowledging the rewarding elements of their experience, including how many clinical interactions humanized incarcerated individuals.

Conclusions: Students' preconceived notions were challenged most during direct student-patient interactions, suggesting that clinical rotations involving direct patient care may hold unique value as compared to lecture-based curricula about carceral health care. Ultimately, the elective led many students to consider working with incarcerated people in the future.

医学生对监狱精神病学经历的反思:定性分析。
目的:大量患有精神疾病的人在监狱和监狱接受治疗,但医学学习者在监狱环境中的经历尚未得到充分探索。本研究分析医学生在精神病学轮转后的反思,以了解学生轮转前的信念,以及这些观念是否因临床经验而改变。作者试图了解临床经验是激励学生还是阻止他们从事医学工作。方法:两名独立编码员回顾了2022年7月至2025年10月期间未确定的学生反思(n = 19),并采用归纳方法编制了主题代码本。反射在ATLAS中进行定性编码。使用商定的密码本的Ti软件。随着更多主题的出现,对守则进行了修订,并以协商一致方式解决了差异。结果:学生反思主要分为五类:(1)先入为主的观念;(2)对监狱环境的认知;(3)对监狱服刑人员的看法;(4)对监狱系统的认知;(5)获得的见解。大多数学生发现他们的临床经验与他们先入为主的信念不一致,特别是关于安全或被监禁者的感知攻击性。许多人认识到监狱系统的缺点,同时也承认他们经历的有益因素,包括多少临床互动使被监禁的人人性化。结论:学生先入为主的观念在学生与患者的直接互动中受到最大的挑战,这表明与以讲座为基础的护理课程相比,涉及直接患者护理的临床轮转可能具有独特的价值。最终,这门选修课让许多学生考虑在未来与囚犯一起工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
157
期刊介绍: Academic Psychiatry is the international journal of the American Association of Chairs of Departments of Psychiatry, American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training, Association for Academic Psychiatry, and Association of Directors of Medical Student Education in Psychiatry. Academic Psychiatry publishes original, scholarly work in psychiatry and the behavioral sciences that focuses on innovative education, academic leadership, and advocacy. The scope of the journal includes work that furthers knowledge and stimulates evidence-based advances in academic psychiatry in the following domains: education and training, leadership and administration, career and professional development, ethics and professionalism, and health and well-being.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书